Results 1 to 30 of 1677

Thread: Fun Papers In Arxiv

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Massachusetts, USA

    Fun Papers In Arxiv

    I have been posting this same collection in Google+ every weekday. Those who read Fraser Cain's G+ already know this. In any case, I ask that if you want to discuss any of these, please start a separate new thread.

    From, November 7th, 2011

    There were quite a few good ones today. I skipped some about GeV and Tev looks at Blazars, because I've been over-reporting on these a bit lately. I also skipped an amusing one about the detectability of unpiloted spaceprobes from other stars in our solar system (#57). The ones I did pick are even cooler. is a paper that takes a close look at the recent Type 1a SN in nearby M101. The availability of good quality (Hubble et. al.) images from pre- and immediately post explosion place very strong constraints on the type(s) of objects that could have been the progenator. Not that there has been MUCH doubt that it is White Dwarfs that turn into Type 1a SNs, but this paper pretty much nails it, allowing a small chance that it could be explained by a neutron star making a transition during a merger. is a product of the Galaxy Zoo project which is crowd sourcing the catagorization of millions of galaxies from SDSS and other broad deep surveys. I like the GZ project. It is a fun useful way for interested amateurs to make useful contributions. In this case they look at the differences that lead to disk galaxies with bars vs. disk galaxies with bulges, and find that barred spirals have higher dark matter to baryonic matter ratios. is a paper about massive Young Steller Objects forming at the edge of bubbles detected by Spitzer (i.e. old supernova remnats). This is not unexpected, but it confirms the idea of triggered star formation by SNs compressing gas and dust clouds. and are papers from Kepler data about Sun-like stars. The first is very short paper about astroseismology looking at stellar ring-tones ( ha ha I coined a term) to see how they compare on the inside to the Sun. The second is a look at Sun spots on other stars, and rotation rates. This gives a nice look at the range of various parameters within the subset of stars that are like the Sun spectrally and size-wise. is a math-heavy paper about Axions as dark matter. Now, with the apparent non-detection of ~100 GeV Neutralinos by CERN, I'm keeping my eye out for other forms that Dark Matter could come in. This paper's title suggested it might answer my biggest doubt about Axions (it didn't), which is that they have a proposed mass of about ten millionths of an electron Volt... how in this universe could they ever slow down enough to be gravitationally bound to a galaxy or galaxy cluster? Somewhere I think someone will write about how being Bose-Einstein particles enables them to lose energy and thermalize... but I didn't see that here. Frequent readers know I'm curious about neutron stars. This paper examines isolated neutron stars to tell us what we know and can know. It includes a few new graphs about the spin-down as they age, among other things. Very readable.
    Last edited by antoniseb; 2011-Nov-08 at 12:44 PM.
    Forming opinions as we speak

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2011-Dec-14, 05:28 PM
  2. Why does arXiv ban people?
    By Noble Ox in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 2009-Nov-15, 07:02 PM
  3. Something Strange Going on at
    By Celestial Mechanic in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 2009-Jul-09, 01:33 PM
  4. Is anyone willing to support a BAUT member in arXiv?
    By john hunter in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2007-Aug-18, 10:28 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts