The work and ideas of Prof. Reginald T. Cahill are not mainstream. They DO represent an interesting intellectual exercise, and you can discuss observations that may confirm or refute them in the Astronomy section, but not here in Q&A. If you want to promote these ideas, you'll need to make sure you have a good handle on them, and them bring them up in ATM. The Q&A section is also not a place for making snide comments about how you can't tell junk from real things that have been retained in arXiv or the CERN collection.
Forming opinions as we speak