Modern astronomers use parallax to determine the distance to a star. The change in the position of a star is measured after an observer on the earth propagates the distance of the earth's orbital diameter (six months). The earth's orbital diameter is used as the reference distance where the parallax method is dependent on the motion of a star after the earth propagates to the position L that forms a path that light propagates that is equal to the distance of the earth's orbital diameter KL but the stellar universe is stationary since the shape of the constellations that constitute the stellar universe do not change shapes, as time increases. The change in the position of a distance star is caused by the earth's daily and yearly motions affect upon the observer's measurements since the change in the position of any star results in the rotational shift of all of the stars' positions in the entire stellar universe that rotation is centered around the North Star which proves modern astronomy is a hoax. In addition, the image of the Eagle Nebula obtained using the Spitzer space telescope was arbitrarily created using computer induced images since the image of the Eagle Nebula represents a celestial gas cloud (fig 13) but the vacuum of celestial universe cannot support the structure of a gas cloud since the vacuum of celestial space would immediately dissipate a gas. Example, a cumulus cloud is formed by the earth's atmosphere that is supporting the water vapor that constitutes a cumulus cloud. Without an atmosphere it would not be physical possible to form a celestial cloud that is depicted in the photographs of the Eagle Nebula. There are no celestial gas cloud in our solar system yet astronomers are suggesting that a gas cloud exist on a distance planet that distance is determine using parallax. Furthermore, Chilean astronomers state that a planet has been discovered orbiting the star Proxima Centauri that is 4.22 light years from the earth using the La Silla telescope (Escude, p. 408409) but the Hubble space telescope that is more powerful than the La Silla telescope (because of the earth's atmosphere) cannot view the lunar lander that is located on the surface of the moon. For the Hubble telescope to view an object on the surface of the moon would require an illuminated object with a diameter of 200 meters. Using a proportionality, for the Hubble to detect a planet 4.22 light years from the earth would require an illuminated planet with a diameter equal to more than ten times the orbital diameter of our solar system! Consequently, Chilean astronomers use the dimming that occurs when a planet, 4.22 light years from the earth, moves between the star Proxima Centauri and the La Silla telescope to justify the existence of a distance planet but if the intensity of a planet 4.22 light years from the earth, cannot be determined using a telescope then the change in the intensity of the star 4.22 light years from the earth, caused by the described planet's area affecting the intensity of a star also cannot be detected. Any detection of the variation of the intensity of a 4.22 light year star would be within the uncertainty of the optical distortion caused by the thermodynamic variations of the earth's atmosphere. Furthermore, the Institute of Astronomy in Cambridge detected a blackhole of the Perseus Clustera that is 250 millions light years from the earth using the Chandra X-ray space telescope but X-rays cannot be focused which would make it extremely difficult to detect stellar X-rays produced by a 250 million light year blackhole. Blackholes represent the maximum range of an optical telescope. Example, when a scientist examines the stellar universe using a pair of binoculars at certain locations one cannot see the images of stars which represents the range of a binocular optical device yet modern astronomers are detecting millions of stars within the small segment of space that the binocular optical device did not detect an image. Modern astronomers need to limit their range to our solar system to avoid these outrageous misrepresentation and patently fabrications of what an optical device can or cannot do since according to modern astronomers a telescope has an unlimited range yet the Hubble cannot view the lunar lander that is located on the surface of the moon. The Hubble space telescope and the fact that the celestial universe is stationary renders all land based telescopes obsolete. Once an astronomer photographs the stellar universe then there is absolutely nothing else that can be done since the stellar universe is stationary. Certainly celestial events do occur but the destruction of a distance star or other celestial events take so long a time interval that any observation would be futile. Using an analogy, it would be futile for scientists to observe a gold fish to detect a gold fish evolving into a Homo sapiens.
The Big Bang expansion theory is justified using the symmetry of a spiral galaxy but the image of a spiral galaxy was arbitrarily created. Example, the image of the Milky Way spiral galaxy that contains the sun and the earth would require that the photographer be many millions of light years away from the earth. Also, the density of the stars of the celestial universe viewed from all direction from the earth is constant yet the image of the Milky Way represents a non-consistent arrangement of stars since the image of the Milky Way galaxy represents a higher density of stars at the center of the Milky Way which conflicts with the constant density of stars of the celestial universe viewed from the earth. If the earth was part of the Milky Way spiral galaxy then the star of the stellar universe would not be constant yet from the earth, the stars of the stellar universe have a constant density in all directions which proves that the hypothesis that the earth is part of the Milky Way spiral galaxy is physically invalid. Furthermore, the red shift is used to justify the Big Bang expansion theory but every star in the universe at different times and positions forms both red and blue shifts since the stellar universe is stationary. When the observer on the surface of the earth propagates towards a star (caused by the earth's daily and yearly motions) the blue shift is produced and when the observer is propagating away from the star, the red shift is observed. The stellar red and blue shifts are formed by the earth's daily and yearly motions affect on the observer viewing the stars of a stationary celestial universe which contradicts the Big Bang theory that is based on a celestial universe that is expanding.