Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: round electron

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Wisconsin USA
    Posts
    2,402

    round electron

    The following article states the electron is round as far as we can tell due to the electric dipole moment. I am wondering if the same answer could be obtained from other perfectly symmetrical shapes?

    https://phys.org/news/2017-10-jila-method-electron.html
    The moment an instant lasted forever, we were destined for the leading edge of eternity.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,460
    Quote Originally Posted by Copernicus View Post
    The following article states the electron is round as far as we can tell due to the electric dipole moment. I am wondering if the same answer could be obtained from other perfectly symmetrical shapes?

    https://phys.org/news/2017-10-jila-method-electron.html
    Could you provide some examples of other shapes that have spherical symmetry?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Wisconsin USA
    Posts
    2,402
    Quote Originally Posted by cjameshuff View Post
    Could you provide some examples of other shapes that have spherical symmetry?
    Lets say you had a cuboctahedron shape, but as the hypothetical electron's many gazillion hypothetical components, are traveling through the cuboctahedron structure the electrons average x, y, and z direction were constantly changing direction resulting in an overall spherical shape.

    see link for cuboctahedron sphere packing. https://www.google.com/search?q=cubo...PdxU5Cn3YkZiM:
    The moment an instant lasted forever, we were destined for the leading edge of eternity.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,592
    Quote Originally Posted by Copernicus View Post
    Lets say you had a cuboctahedron shape, but as the hypothetical electron's many gazillion hypothetical components, are traveling through the cuboctahedron structure the electrons average x, y, and z direction were constantly changing direction resulting in an overall spherical shape.
    So what about this is actually cuboctahedral in shape? What you describe sounds spherical.

    Grant Hutchison

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    15,680
    Quote Originally Posted by Copernicus View Post
    Lets say you had a cuboctahedron shape, but as the hypothetical electron's many gazillion hypothetical components, are traveling through the cuboctahedron structure [...]
    Hypothetically, let's say I didn't. You show me your hypotheses and I'll show you mine. Components? You mean the virtual-particles and their cloud?

    [...] the electrons average x, y, and z direction were constantly changing direction resulting in an overall spherical shape.
    The electron's directions? The directions were changing directions? And when the electron's directions change direction then that changes the electron's (cloud's) shape? So... it is "overall" spherical? It was always spherical?
    0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
    This line intentionally left blank.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Wisconsin USA
    Posts
    2,402
    Quote Originally Posted by 01101001 View Post
    Hypothetically, let's say I didn't. You show me your hypotheses and I'll show you mine. Components? You mean the virtual-particles and their cloud?



    The electron's directions? The directions were changing directions? And when the electron's directions change direction then that changes the electron's (cloud's) shape? So... it is "overall" spherical? It was always spherical?
    No ablo elvish? Are you offering me food or insult?
    The moment an instant lasted forever, we were destined for the leading edge of eternity.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    6,484
    Quote Originally Posted by Copernicus View Post
    The following article states the electron is round as far as we can tell due to the electric dipole moment. I am wondering if the same answer could be obtained from other perfectly symmetrical shapes?
    https://phys.org/news/2017-10-jila-method-electron.html
    Well for one thing they are not actually measuring any kind of physical 'roundness' of the electron. They are measuring the electron electric dipole moment. This is related to the distribution of charge with a non-zero value implying a deviation from perfectly spherically symmetric, and it is another assumption that the distribution of charge is related to a physical shape of the electron (on top of the assumption that it is meaningful to talk about an electron having shape). The electron could be shaped like a banana, this test would not identify that if the charge distribution were spherical.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,624
    Unless I am not up-date on the latest particle physics - electrons are considered to be point particles. They have no dimension.
    It is only sensical to talk about their electric dipole moment, not about any supposed physical size or shape.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,123
    An electric dipole moment for the electron would be incredibly small. Despite being a point charge, there are effects(CP violation) in the standard model that make it theoretically non-zero.

    Measuring both the electron's and neutron's EDM is part of the search for physics beyond the standard model.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Wisconsin USA
    Posts
    2,402
    Quote Originally Posted by Shaula View Post
    Well for one thing they are not actually measuring any kind of physical 'roundness' of the electron. They are measuring the electron electric dipole moment. This is related to the distribution of charge with a non-zero value implying a deviation from perfectly spherically symmetric, and it is another assumption that the distribution of charge is related to a physical shape of the electron (on top of the assumption that it is meaningful to talk about an electron having shape). The electron could be shaped like a banana, this test would not identify that if the charge distribution were spherical.
    That was my first thought.
    The moment an instant lasted forever, we were destined for the leading edge of eternity.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    1,657
    Quote Originally Posted by Shaula View Post
    ....they are not actually measuring any kind of physical 'roundness' of the electron. They are measuring the electron electric dipole moment. This is related to the distribution of charge with a non-zero value implying a deviation from perfectly spherically symmetric, and it is another assumption that the distribution of charge is related to a physical shape of the electron (on top of the assumption that it is meaningful to talk about an electron having shape)...
    Yes that's correct. Electrons are point-like particles with no physical size and no physical structure, whether round or any other shape. This is why the above article used "roundness" in quotes. Unfortunately the title did not use quotes which could imply to some readers the bare electron has a physical size and shape. It does not.

    https://www.fnal.gov/pub/today/archi...lReadMore.html

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    12,390
    Maybe this should be a thread of its own, but if an electron is really a point, as an electron and positron approach one another, wonít the EM force (as well as gravitational force) go toward infinity? I guess thatís only in a classical world.
    As above, so below

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    6,484
    Quote Originally Posted by Jens View Post
    Maybe this should be a thread of its own, but if an electron is really a point, as an electron and positron approach one another, won’t the EM force (as well as gravitational force) go toward infinity? I guess that’s only in a classical world.
    Every point charge is surrounded by a fuzzy cloud of self-interactions. This cloud means that the mass and charge of a particle doesn't appear the same at all scales. Neither does the interaction cross-section of this cloud. As you go to smaller scales (higher energies) the divergences caused by having point particles (ultraviolet divergences) rapidly become unphysical unless you correct for this effect via renormalisation. There is a section on this in the history of QED article on Wikipedia.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •