I am looking for criticism of my theory. May be I can find it in Internet? In scope of the theory, I trying to build unified field theory. For me, results looks quite good. However, personal opinion of author usually quite biased, so I may not notice some critical problems in the theory. Article with the theory currently is in one of scientific journals, being considered by editors. However, based on past, I not expect anything from it, just expect rejection. In several journals editors sent previous article with the theory to peer review, reviewers suggested to reject it. However, none of reviewers found any critical failures in proposed theory. In latest review, for previous article, reviewer suggested to reject it because the theory is not allows to calculate physical situations and noted what publication of paradigm shifting theory is much harder than usual theory. Well, he was somewhat right about calculations for previous article. In new article, I derived lots of existing equations and theories from my theory. So, it is possible to calculate physical situations based on the theory now. The theory contains predictions and can be falsified, so it is satisfy to Popper criteria. For example, it predicts absence of quant of gravity. Mathematic model of the theory is not complete, so it is hard to predict new phenomena with current state of the theory, but it is not impossible. I think future development may solve it.

Main achievement of the theory, as I see it, is unification of all fields and answer to set of most fundamental questions. All fields, include gravity, are derived from one fundamental field. The theory is deterministic, and at same time quantum mechanics with uncertainly principle is derived from the theory. It is shown that is gravity and how it arise. All principles of general relativity are derived in the theory. It is shown why speed of light is constant and why it is same in all frames of references.

The theory answers to questions such as origin of Universe, what is time, what is space, what is matter and fields, why mathematics is so well describe physics and so on. The theory is not require Big Bang but not goes against it, additional way to form Universe with observable uniformity looks possible. In article I proposed explanations on nature of dark matter and dark energy. Further development of the theory seems to allow find exact equations describing dark matter and dark energy.

Cost of the unification is not cheap. The theory goes deep into most fundamental concepts of philosophy. It goes against the very fundamental beliefs and, I think, it cause main problem with publication.

Article with theory can be found on vixra

I work on the theory from time to time, when nothing else to do. So it improving slowly. Physics is hobby for me. However, I have MSc in physics, and several publications as coauthor in journals with good impact factor, during time when I was postgraduate student.

Abstract for article:

An axiomatic deterministic theory of physics based on a single scalar field was proposed. In the theory model at the fundamental level there is no time and dynamics. It is shown how space-time with matter and fields emerge in this model. It is shown that the anthropic principle emerges as a consequence of the theory. The causality principle is derived as a consequence of the main principles of the theory. All three Newton's equations are obtained as consequences of the theory and in the nonrelativistic approximation. Mass, energy and other concepts of mechanics were obtained. The Schrödinger equation is derived. An explanation of the nature of particle spin is proposed. It is shown that the maximum speed of interactions must be finite and be the same in all inertial frames of reference. It is shown that the light speed and the maximum speed of interactions are exactly equal. A special theory of relativity with all its equations is obtained. The Klein-Gordon-Fock equations and, with some assumptions, the Dirac equations are obtained. Particles interaction is considered. There were given explanations of what virtual particles and quanta of field interactions are, and how renormalization works in quantum field theory. Seemingly fundamental interactions, such as strong, weak and electromagnetic are shown. Maxwell's equations are obtained, with some assumptions. It is shown that the standard model does not contradict the proposed theory. The nature of gravitation is considered. A strong equivalence principle is proved, all assumptions on which the general theory of relativity is based are proved. Based on this, it can be argued that the equations of the general relativity theory satisfy the theory of emergent space-time-matter. It is shown that gravity cannot have quanta. Thus, this theory asserts that no theory of quantum gravity can exist. An explanation of the origin of the universe is proposed. An explanation is offered for the nature of dark energy and dark matter. Physical foundations of mathematics are considered.

Model of the theory:

The theory is based on the assumption that at the fundamental level there is only Euclidean space with a certain still unknown amount of dimensions and a scalar field defined on this space. There is nothing else at the fundamental level except the listed, including the time, space and matter observed by us. All dimensions are the same, there are no any specific dimensions. I assume smoothness of the fundamental scalar field. A scalar field is described by some unknown differential equation.