Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 121 to 135 of 135

Thread: Rockets need an atmosphere to propel. There's no air in space.

  1. #121
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Posts
    30,655
    I mean, we don't do it anymore, but at the old Ren Faire site, we'd spend the second Saturday evening lying on our backs on hay bales staring upward, since it comes at the peak of the Perseids. My boss, who is an eighth-grade dropout, used to point out satellites. Is he getting paid by NASA? It can't be much, given what I know of his finances over the years.
    _____________________________________________
    Gillian

    "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

    "You can't erase icing."

    "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

  2. #122
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    25
    Quote Originally Posted by Van Rijn View Post
    What? Perhaps you didn't understand my question.

    I'm asking you (again) how the spacecraft and satellites that I track and view (using my eyes, binoculars, and telescope) from my own yard got into space if not for rockets?

    Is it perhaps the case that you aren't aware that it is quite feasible to track and see many man-made objects in space? Many people do this. Neowatcher earlier in thread showed detailed views of the International Space Station.
    I've never seen anything in the sky that can be perceived as a satellite. I've been looking at the sky constantly. I see stars, falling stars, regular stuff. Planes with contrails.

    So essentially, you are debating the issue of rockets working in space using circumstantial evidence that can be fabricated rather than direct evidence based on actual science and observation.

    People can and have fallen for hoaxes

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs0K4ApWl4g

  3. #123
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    25
    Macroscopic example of pressure. Soccer balls in a net. The force applied place tension on the net and holds the balls in. Untie the net and the balls fall out and the net collapses because there is no more tension caused by the balls. No opposite force is seen.

  4. #124
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    No longer near Grover's Mill
    Posts
    4,732
    Quote Originally Posted by rockethunter View Post
    I've never seen anything in the sky that can be perceived as a satellite. I've been looking at the sky constantly. I see stars, falling stars, regular stuff. Planes with contrails.
    Bunk.



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I may have many faults, but being wrong ain't one of them. - Jimmy Hoffa

  5. #125
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    15,241
    Quote Originally Posted by rockethunter View Post
    Macroscopic example of pressure. Soccer balls in a net. The force applied place tension on the net and holds the balls in. Untie the net and the balls fall out and the net collapses because there is no more tension caused by the balls. No opposite force is seen.
    I welcome the fourth time you come with the bogus gravity/dropping example. The net doesn't accelerate the ball downwards so the net doesn't get an opposite force. The earth accelerates the ball so the earth feels an opposite force. Read carefully what people say here, it's not all rocket science.

    Have you blown up a balloon yet? Or have you never played with a balloon. After all, you somehow have managed to miss all satellites passing over even though you say you look at the sky a lot. From earth with the naked eye, a satellite is seen as a constant (not blinking) light moving slowly across the sky, about the size of a star. Take a decent telescope and you can make out details on the larger constructions such as the ISS. You can't simply argue nothing is up there; you can see it from your own backyard with a nice telescope. For example, this picture of the ISS was made using a relatively small telescope any private person could buy/build:



    Made with this scope (and this guy):


    So spaceflight obviously is not a hoax, it's there for all to see. So do tell me, how did the ISS get up there if rockets do not work in a vacuum?
    Last edited by Nicolas; 2019-Mar-16 at 09:29 PM.

  6. #126
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    15,241
    PS there is a video demonstrating Newton's laws, filmed on board of the ISS. Pretty masochistic hoax that would be: faking Newton's laws in your faked space station to try and fool people into believing Newton's laws are valid so spaceflight is valid so your ISS is valid. I mean, seriously. The extent of the hoax you're proposing is proposterous. You do realize there are commercial companies, having nothing to do with NASA, the USA, or any rocket launching business, that build/own satellites and use the data they produce, do you? You do realize 100 orbital launches are done per year, resulting in more than 100 satellites added per year? With each satellite having a large to huge user base? Basically, the whole world would have to be "in on it" and still there is the masochistic part of having a big secret and yet keep doing things (launches, new satellites, etc) that have to be faked, again and again. And WHY would "they" do that? It makes no sense, even if people couldn't see spacecraft from their backyard. And they can.

  7. #127
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    581
    Quote Originally Posted by rockethunter View Post
    I've never seen anything in the sky that can be perceived as a satellite.
    Your failure to do so does not change the fact that many of us have done so.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epf8NiLszoc
    Quote Originally Posted by rockethunter View Post
    I've been looking at the sky constantly. I see stars, falling stars, regular stuff. Planes with contrails.

    So essentially, you are debating the issue of rockets working in space using circumstantial evidence that can be fabricated rather than direct evidence based on actual science and observation.

    People can and have fallen for hoaxes

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs0K4ApWl4g
    This isn't a hoax, nor is it a radioplay:
    https://forum.cosmoquest.org/showthr...25#post2478225
    This is direct evidence of rockets working in the vacuum of space, which you've been ignoring since page 3. I say again, what evidence do you have to support your claim that the above video does not show a rocket in space?

  8. #128
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Great NorthWet
    Posts
    14,034
    And it's easy to see the ISS. There's even a handy website that'll tell you when and where to look. Of course, that's just from NASA, who I'm sure will just fly a plane over all those locations every night.
    Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.

  9. #129
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    932
    Quote Originally Posted by rockethunter View Post
    I've never seen anything in the sky that can be perceived as a satellite. I've been looking at the sky constantly. I see stars, falling stars, regular stuff. Planes with contrails.

    So essentially, you are debating the issue of rockets working in space using circumstantial evidence that can be fabricated rather than direct evidence based on actual science and observation.

    People can and have fallen for hoaxes

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs0K4ApWl4g
    You certainly have fallen for one.

  10. #130
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    15,241
    And it's easy to see the ISS. There's even a handy website that'll tell you when and where to look. Of course, that's just from NASA, who I'm sure will just fly a plane over all those locations every night.
    And given the plane would be much lower than it claims to be, you'd need to fly multiple planes to accomodate viewers across the line of sight. Let's say 10 planes are enough to fool all astronomers looking at the fake ISS (it's not, those guys measure more precise than 1į). There are currently 5000 satellites in space (or so they say!). that would take 50.000 planes to fake just the visual observation from the ground. Then there is the data they are sending. But never mind, that would mean the Fakers-R-Us airline would have double the total number of official aircraft (excluding light aircraft) in the world today. Yeah. And all that just to propagate a hoax that has no reason to be. And I'm totally ignoring the fact that if a pressure gradiŽnt would not follow Newton's laws, aircraft engines of any type would also not work. So...

  11. #131
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    15,241
    I'm wondering how the GPS in my car works if satellites don't exist. Or the communication lines which I use onboard of ships in the middle of the ocean. I use those things on a regular basis, they exist. How so, if satellites cannot be launched into space?

  12. #132
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    932
    So um rockethunter what experiments have you conducted and what data were recorded/observed to prove your theory?

  13. #133
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    18,186
    Quote Originally Posted by rockethunter View Post
    I've never seen anything in the sky that can be perceived as a satellite. I've been looking at the sky constantly. I see stars, falling stars, regular stuff. Planes with contrails.
    What specific effort have you made to track and view spacecraft/satellites? I've been watching them since the '70s.


    So essentially, you are debating the issue of rockets working in space using circumstantial evidence that can be fabricated rather than direct evidence based on actual science and observation.
    No, I'm discussing direct evidence, based on what I and many other people have seen. And you are also still ignoring the other part of the question: What of the satellites needed for GPS, satellite TV, satellite based emergency beacons, satellite phones, and so forth? Or if you're going to claim those are all somehow faked, then please provide a plausible method by which that could be done. Good luck.

    "The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is hard to verify their authenticity." ó Abraham Lincoln

    I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

    The Leif Ericson Cruiser

  14. #134
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    3,012
    Quote Originally Posted by Trebuchet View Post
    And it's easy to see the ISS. There's even a handy website that'll tell you when and where to look. Of course, that's just from NASA, who I'm sure will just fly a plane over all those locations every night.
    Better still, the Iridium Flares - I wonder who NASA hires to fly over my location in outback Australia in a darkened plane, remembering to turn on an intensely bright light from their plane for a few seconds with pinpoint timing, just for my benefit. Curious that I've never seen that particular job advertised in the aviation press. ��

  15. #135
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Peters Creek, Alaska
    Posts
    12,512
    The OP will be taking some time off, so this thread is closed.

    rockethunter,

    If you wish to continue this thread upon your return, report this post and ask that it be reopened.
    Forum Rules►  ◄FAQ►  ◄ATM Forum Advice►  ◄Conspiracy Advice
    Click http://cosmoquest.org/forum/images/buttons/report-40b.png to report a post (even this one) to the moderation team.


    Man is a tool-using animal. Nowhere do you find him without tools; without tools he is nothing, with tools he is all. ó Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •