PDA

View Full Version : The Heck Is This Thing?



cynic
2010-May-01, 03:15 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DG_7iz57fJI&feature=fvw

??

Swift
2010-May-01, 03:37 AM
cynic,

First, welcome to BAUT.

Second, I have edited the title of this thread. Please watch the language; if you wouldn't say it to your grandmother or a four year old, don't say it here.

Third, it is considered polite behavior here, when linking to a video, to give a little summary of the content, or what you think about it.

Swift
2010-May-01, 03:41 AM
For the rest of you, the video is some images from the Stereo satellite and the things of interest are some bright, close to point sized "objects" that I think the maker of the video contends are alien spacecraft.

I'm not sure what they are, but I'm far from convinced they are any mystery.

Nice heavy metal music in the background of the video, if you like that sort of thing.

Bozola
2010-May-01, 04:13 AM
The Heck Is This Thing?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DG_7iz57fJI&feature=fvw

??

It's called an Uniform resource Locator or "URL", for short.

cynic
2010-May-01, 04:16 AM
Apologies about the language, and thanks for the welcome.
The poster of the video is claiming it to be Planet X, but obviously that's just the conspiracy theorists clutching at straws.

I'm just interested to find out what it is from people who actually know what they're talking about, as tbh I've never seen an object as bright as that on it before.

Van Rijn
2010-May-01, 04:23 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DG_7iz57fJI&feature=fvw

??

Planets or stars (or possibly comets, but unlikely). There are several pages at the Stereo site that describe various artifacts. The general page is here:

http://stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov/artifacts/artifacts.shtml

And quoting from this page:

http://stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov/artifacts/artifacts_planets.shtml


In the HI1 and HI2 images, planet images and particularly bright stars will also be accompanied by vertical streaks (either white or black), which is due to the shutterless readout of the cameras on these telescopes. Most planets will move from left to right, but the inner planets Mercury and Venus often are seen moving from right to left.

Occasionally, even bright comets can cause vertical streaks in the data. Here is an image of Comet McNaught as it appears in HI1-B on the SSC website. Note the large dark vertical dark streak, and the smeared brightness toward the bottom of the image, both effects caused by the high brightness of this particular comet. Advanced techniques exist for removing some of these effects from the images, but these are not applied routinely on the SSC website.

astrophotographer
2010-May-01, 02:53 PM
I think the author of the film is not being very accurate on his representations of where the various satellites are placed. The impression he gives is they are relatively close to earth but that is not the case. He also does not show the positions of the two inner planets for an obvious reason IMO.

I went to the Stereo website and they have an orbit plot generator:

http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/where/make_where_gif.php

I entered 04-17-10 at 0000 UT and got the following plot:

12946

Note the position of Mercury. For the behind satellite, it would appear to the right of the sun. For the ahead satellite, it would appear to the left of the sun. It would change positions relative to the stars since it is relatively close.

IMO, this shows the planet Mercury.

Joe Boy
2010-May-01, 06:05 PM
I think the author of the film is not being very accurate on his representations of where the various satellites are placed. The impression he gives is they are relatively close to earth but that is not the case. He also does not show the positions of the two inner planets for an obvious reason IMO.

I went to the Stereo website and they have an orbit plot generator:

http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/where/make_where_gif.php

I entered 04-17-10 at 0000 UT and got the following plot:

12946

Note the position of Mercury. For the behind satellite, it would appear to the right of the sun. For the ahead satellite, it would appear to the left of the sun. It would change positions relative to the stars since it is relatively close.

IMO, this shows the planet Mercury.

Swamp gas-that was easy--next

Bozola
2010-May-02, 04:52 AM
Heavy metal music is whole inappropriate for a G2V star.

Weltraum
2010-May-02, 10:01 PM
And that video linked to another funny one - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZPJRs0bx6Y&annotation_id=annotation_886900&feature=iv

This one features a lot of video taken of the sun through clouds (allowing the camera to properly record a disc despite the sun's brightness, just as happens with the naked eye), and then there's a clip claiming to show a "second sun." Yet I for one can see no reason not to interpret his "second sun" as the sun. Looks like it's in the same place to me, and of course there are far better ways to go about looking for a second sun! Sunrise and sunset come first to mind, considering that even tiny Mercury becomes visible at those times. So silly.

slang
2010-May-02, 10:48 PM
I think it's satire. Evanescence lyrics from the song:

Save me from the nothing I've become.
Bring me to life.
(I've been living a lie. There's nothing inside)
Bring me to life

The author is saying to other CT movie posters: get a life! And if he isn't... that's how it comes across. Shouldn't have picked a song just because you liked it, bud.

Hungry4info
2010-May-02, 10:52 PM
Heavy metal music is whole inappropriate for a G2V star.

My thoughts exactly. Haha.

[deep heavy metal voice] M DWARFS!!!! [enter guitar solo]

astrophotographer
2010-May-03, 12:15 AM
And that video linked to another funny one - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZPJRs0bx6Y&annotation_id=annotation_886900&feature=iv

This one features a lot of video taken of the sun through clouds (allowing the camera to properly record a disc despite the sun's brightness, just as happens with the naked eye), and then there's a clip claiming to show a "second sun." Yet I for one can see no reason not to interpret his "second sun" as the sun. Looks like it's in the same place to me, and of course there are far better ways to go about looking for a second sun! Sunrise and sunset come first to mind, considering that even tiny Mercury becomes visible at those times. So silly.

I think this individual has some serious problems with reality. What does he expect, the second sun was only present in this universe for a minute or so (and only from his location when they happened to be recording it) and then disappeared?