PDA

View Full Version : ESA moon mission



ToSeek
2002-Apr-25, 08:17 PM
SMART-1 (http://unisci.com/stories/20022/0425023.htm)

The important question is, of course, whether or not it will take good enough photos of the landing sites to make out the descent stage.

(And what's the emphasis on Apollo 16? It wasn't the last mission!)

Art Vandelay
2002-Apr-25, 08:31 PM
In addition to the descent stages, I wonder it can spot the areas where the S-IVB's crashed. Would that be acceptable proof for the HB guys?

Donnie B.
2002-Apr-25, 08:33 PM
Maybe it's because A16 was almost exactly 30 years ago, whereas A17 was a bit less than 30 years ago... but why that should matter is a bit mysterious.

Johnno
2002-Apr-25, 09:27 PM
"I wonder it can spot the areas where the S-IVB's crashed. Would that be acceptable proof for the HB guys?"

Doubt it, it'd just prove something crashed there, just like the 'lunar surface anomaly' at the A15 landing site only proves something landed there, not that it was a LM which carried astronauts.

And you reckon when we do get pics of LM descent stages, that the HBers will say 'fine, something landed there, but were they manned modules? can we see footprints?'... and in the end, theyll claim it was some tiny robot rover that went around pressing down with a boot....

I dont think we'll ever win /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif

2002-Sep-23, 04:57 PM
A push up (from page 20?) by HUb's 486/100 ? maybe
anyway it rekindles my lunar theory that the moons two faced
the HEAVY [Basalt] side faces Earth & the Light
{Andisite}[Granite] side's the far side!
So its clear to me.. any theory of lunar formation
MUST account for the TWO faces of the moon..
And of course for me the Pacific Basin Origon
of the Moon [YOUNG MOON] FITS THE SCENERIO!
anyway not that lunar rocks themselves are not the same age as Earth Rock.. of course THEY ARE Earth rock
its just that the so called "ORBIT" {tradjectory} of the moons realitivly New.. ei contemparanious with Astroids as debries /solid planet {well?}

2002-Sep-23, 10:08 PM
MUST account for the TWO faces of the moon..
And of course for me the Pacific Basin Origon
of the Moon [YOUNG MOON] FITS THE SCENERIO!

This has been discounted of recent years. The Pacific Ocean is way to young (60 odd million years) to have been involved in the formation of the Moon.

It was a fairly good theory till continental drift came along.

Glen

jrkeller
2002-Sep-24, 03:47 AM
Here's some more stuff on SMART plus some other moon missions

http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/moon_next_020923-1.html

Manchurian Taikonaut
2005-Jun-11, 04:07 PM
Calcium on the Moon
Billions of Tonnes of water to be found ??
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=16902
http://www.indiadaily.com/editorial/2760.asp
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=17063

France scientists will be working with NASA in future, and ESA plans a joint Lunar mission with India

ToSeek
2005-Jun-11, 07:11 PM
http://www.indiadaily.com/editorial/2760.asp


India Daily is not a good source for reliable information. Note the links on that page to articles about weather manipulation and getting technology from UFOs.

2005-Jun-27, 03:51 PM
15 minutes into yestrdays PBS/opb Astronomy program
The Dark
segment of "DARK" Matter dark ENERGY
?

%%% 2:28 PM 6/26/05 sqU/O^ie(A'misH {yeah? Hi Hi (HiHo)'s} AstronomY?
Just reWatched "Dark Matter : Dark Energy" OPB/PBS Local CH10 11 to 12
-----------
V.R. 1/3r Solar v=.5Mm/h about center
.A convert 24e7 years to hours 24e7Y * 365.24 d/y * 24 h/d = 2.1e12 hrs
B. RT=d R=.5e6Miles/hr T=2.1e12hr D= 1e18 Miles Circ / PI = .335e18 Dia
Radius for Solar Orbit computed to be equal to 167.41e9 "Miles"


the STATEment: Sun's velocity about the CENTER of GALAXY = 1/2 Million "MILES" per Hour was what gets my attention...
? are there other numbers for Solar SPEED in Galatic Orbit ?

Back2Ill-:L+ http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=17063

1. the Xray plot for 1/15/05 reminds me a lot of the plot on TV yesterday
2: my first nit is the X-Axis which i see marked strangly
3: the brown line where the BLUE dash points away from travels back in time

4: for now theres no 4

; http://www.sel.noaa.gov/ftpdir/plots/2005_plots/xray/20050115_xray.gif

publiusr
2005-Jun-29, 05:29 PM
"I wonder it can spot the areas where the S-IVB's crashed. Would that be acceptable proof for the HB guys?"

Doubt it, it'd just prove something crashed there, just like the 'lunar surface anomaly' at the A15 landing site only proves something landed there, not that it was a LM which carried astronauts>

I thought they were sent towards the sun. I seem to remember a year or two ago that one of these things might have been mistaken for a NEO hazard.

I think only the N-1 LOK was to use a 'crasher' stage.

NEOWatcher
2005-Jun-29, 05:35 PM
"I wonder it can spot the areas where the S-IVB's crashed. Would that be acceptable proof for the HB guys?"

Doubt it, it'd just prove something crashed there, just like the 'lunar surface anomaly' at the A15 landing site only proves something landed there, not that it was a LM which carried astronauts>

I thought they were sent towards thesun. I seem to remember a year or two ago that one of these things might have been mistaken for a NEO hazard.

I think only the N-1 LOK was to use a 'crasher' stage.
Some were, some weren't according to the articles on the object at the time. I think that was over 2 years ago, I loved watching the orbit simulations on it. Was it proved that that's what it was? I think I remember the experts saying that there was some question about it.

ToSeek
2005-Jun-29, 05:40 PM
"I wonder it can spot the areas where the S-IVB's crashed. Would that be acceptable proof for the HB guys?"

Doubt it, it'd just prove something crashed there, just like the 'lunar surface anomaly' at the A15 landing site only proves something landed there, not that it was a LM which carried astronauts>

I thought they were sent towards thesun. I seem to remember a year or two ago that one of these things might have been mistaken for a NEO hazard.

I think only the N-1 LOK was to use a 'crasher' stage.
Some were, some weren't according to the articles on the object at the time. I think that was over 2 years ago, I loved watching the orbit simulations on it. Was it proved that that's what it was? I think I remember the experts saying that there was some question about it.

Analysis of the reflection spectrum showed signs of titanium, and the white paint on the stage was titanium-based, so most considered this conclusive evidence that it was an Apollo third stage.

Hamlet
2005-Jun-29, 06:03 PM
"I wonder it can spot the areas where the S-IVB's crashed. Would that be acceptable proof for the HB guys?"

Doubt it, it'd just prove something crashed there, just like the 'lunar surface anomaly' at the A15 landing site only proves something landed there, not that it was a LM which carried astronauts>

I thought they were sent towards the sun. I seem to remember a year or two ago that one of these things might have been mistaken for a NEO hazard.

I think only the N-1 LOK was to use a 'crasher' stage.

S-IVB impacts (http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/lunar/apollo_impact.html)

Count Zero
2005-Jun-30, 12:02 AM
S-IVB impacts (http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/lunar/apollo_impact.html)

The Apollo 11 and 16 LM's were jettisoned into (temporary) lunar orbits.
I wonder how temporary? Wouldn't that be an archeological find! I guess that's how the ascent stage wound-up back on the surface in Futurama; here (http://www.gotfuturama.com/cgi-bin/imageview.cgi?/Multimedia/FrameGrabs/1ACV02/Grabs/pic00386.jpg) and here (http://www.gotfuturama.com/cgi-bin/imageview.cgi?/Multimedia/FrameGrabs/1ACV02/Grabs/pic00418.jpg) (note the sign in the background).

Tuckerfan
2005-Jun-30, 07:03 AM
S-IVB impacts (http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/lunar/apollo_impact.html)

The Apollo 11 and 16 LM's were jettisoned into (temporary) lunar orbits.
I wonder how temporary? Wouldn't that be an archeological find! I guess that's how the ascent stage wound-up back on the surface in Futurama; here (http://www.gotfuturama.com/cgi-bin/imageview.cgi?/Multimedia/FrameGrabs/1ACV02/Grabs/pic00386.jpg) and here (http://www.gotfuturama.com/cgi-bin/imageview.cgi?/Multimedia/FrameGrabs/1ACV02/Grabs/pic00418.jpg) (note the sign in the background).Actually, that was an afterthought of the producers (the sign, that is). They forgot exactly what happened to the landers, and didn't bother to check on it, until it was too late to do much of anything but add the sign to explain things.

Manchurian Taikonaut
2005-Jul-08, 09:53 PM
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=37626
more on it
http://www.esa.int/esaSC/SEMSDE1A6BD_index_0.html
SMART-1 will look for water (in the form of ice) on the Moon.
http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/SMART-1/SEMDNPV4QWD_0.html
To save precious xenon fuel, SMART-1 uses 'celestial mechanics', that is, techniques like making use of 'lunar resonances' and fly-bys.
http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEM4711DU8E_index_0.html

http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/MasterCatalog?sc=2003-043C
http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/multimedia/display.cfm?IM_ID=2523

2005-Jul-12, 04:33 PM
20050714 sorry it took a while for me to find this

Candy's clues wher not 2 illuminating

ToSeek
2005-Jul-12, 09:47 PM
HUb', your link doesn't work and it messes up the page (making everything scroll off to the right). Please edit or remove it. Thanks.

V-GER
2005-Sep-02, 06:38 PM
Here's the latest SMART-1 images:

http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/SMART-1/SEMXY2A5QCE_0.html

http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/SMART-1/SEMB7A808BE_0.html

Manchurian Taikonaut
2008-Jul-02, 05:56 PM
Eight teams taking up ESA’s Lunar Robotics Challenge (http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMGAASHKHF_index_0.html)