Goldstone

2011-Oct-05, 03:59 PM

There is a situation where there is a problem with current hypothesis with energy ranges consistant with the mass of the Higgs. There and here, we find ourselves fluctuation between an inherent problem of the standard model.

Mathematicians will admit that there is no other solution to the standard (and most simplest) equations to adding mass to a system than that which is found in the solutions for the simple potential of the mexican hat. In this case, a Higgs field should be taken seriously, but the quantization field should be a local phenomenon which expands directly over all minimal particle masses; particles which do not favor that energy level are reserved for the family of exotic particles which make up dark energy.

Without such speculative thoughts, the energy required to shift the equations to allow a symmetry breaking in the mexican hat potential, a simple one at that, allows us to speculate that this symmetry breaking could be allowed by assuming the mass of particle is obtained by borrowing this energy from the gradient gravitational potential field.

Mathematically, a particle with a mass that will depend upon the gravitational field energy locally covariant component of a minkowski four dimensional equation provides us with the description:

http://www.codecogs.com/eq.latex?\bar{\psi}(\Box \phi \ell^3) c^2\psi

This covariant expression is derived from Nordstrom's relationship

http://www.codecogs.com/eq.latex?\box \phi = \frac{M}{V}

thus the relationship to find the local mass intrinsic rest relationship is

http://www.codecogs.com/eq.latex? \frac{M}{V} \ell^3 = M

Thus the relativistic relationship accounting momentum-energy contribution is

http://www.codecogs.com/eq.latex?\bar{\psi}c(\gamma^i \cdot \hat{p})\chi + \bar{\psi}(\Box \phi \ell^3) c^2\psi = \bar{\psi} \gamma^0 (i\hbar \partial_t) \psi

Intuitively, mass implies rationally a rest mass which invokes speeds that exist around the minimal energy

http://www.codecogs.com/eq.latex?(\hbar \omega)^{\frac{1}{2}

This means that

http://www.codecogs.com/eq.latex?\bar{\psi}c(\gamma^i \cdot \hat{p})\chi = c

for massless bosons. For faster than light particles, the superluminal component is

http://www.codecogs.com/eq.latex?\bar{\psi}c(\gamma^i \cdot \hat{p})\chi > c (rest)

Mathematicians will admit that there is no other solution to the standard (and most simplest) equations to adding mass to a system than that which is found in the solutions for the simple potential of the mexican hat. In this case, a Higgs field should be taken seriously, but the quantization field should be a local phenomenon which expands directly over all minimal particle masses; particles which do not favor that energy level are reserved for the family of exotic particles which make up dark energy.

Without such speculative thoughts, the energy required to shift the equations to allow a symmetry breaking in the mexican hat potential, a simple one at that, allows us to speculate that this symmetry breaking could be allowed by assuming the mass of particle is obtained by borrowing this energy from the gradient gravitational potential field.

Mathematically, a particle with a mass that will depend upon the gravitational field energy locally covariant component of a minkowski four dimensional equation provides us with the description:

http://www.codecogs.com/eq.latex?\bar{\psi}(\Box \phi \ell^3) c^2\psi

This covariant expression is derived from Nordstrom's relationship

http://www.codecogs.com/eq.latex?\box \phi = \frac{M}{V}

thus the relationship to find the local mass intrinsic rest relationship is

http://www.codecogs.com/eq.latex? \frac{M}{V} \ell^3 = M

Thus the relativistic relationship accounting momentum-energy contribution is

http://www.codecogs.com/eq.latex?\bar{\psi}c(\gamma^i \cdot \hat{p})\chi + \bar{\psi}(\Box \phi \ell^3) c^2\psi = \bar{\psi} \gamma^0 (i\hbar \partial_t) \psi

Intuitively, mass implies rationally a rest mass which invokes speeds that exist around the minimal energy

http://www.codecogs.com/eq.latex?(\hbar \omega)^{\frac{1}{2}

This means that

http://www.codecogs.com/eq.latex?\bar{\psi}c(\gamma^i \cdot \hat{p})\chi = c

for massless bosons. For faster than light particles, the superluminal component is

http://www.codecogs.com/eq.latex?\bar{\psi}c(\gamma^i \cdot \hat{p})\chi > c (rest)