PDA

View Full Version : Oct-Nov-Dec Quakes



2002-May-08, 06:10 PM
<a name="20020508.Q"> page 20020508.Q aka Oct-Nov-Dec Quakes
<pre>:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::| | 2-8-01 begin Clm 2
10 6 /... this Active Quake Season::::::::::| | 2-9-18 getting ready
11 4<583..WILL Begin SomeWhen:::::::::::::::| | A Full moon 2B 9/21/02
12 4 .. prior to Oct 6th 2002::::::::::::::| | NEW MOON events [10/6]
29 30 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 Oct| | Q1 4cast 10/2-4 {mark it}
3/4......<---Q-->....NMoon...<--Q-->.........| |...belive what you will
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Oct| | Ok? 2-10-03
1/4...Lull...<--Q-->....Full....<--Q-->......| | this 1st lull
27 28 29 30 31 n1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 Nov| | OCT 15 {looking}
......3/4..<--q-->......NMoon...<---Q--->....| |
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Nov| |
...1/4...Lull............<-Q>.Full...........<?>| |
24 25 26 27 28 29 30 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Dec| |
.........3/4...........?......New...<???>.........| |
08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Dec| |
.........1/4...Lull..........................| |
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 01 02 03 04 Jan| |
<a name="Rev=2-9-26"> LINE= Rev=2-9-26 aka Rev=2-9-26

nOVEMBER/
was an extreamly quiet Quake month ? and so was Dec
for an Active Quake season
the reason I give for this was that
October was Extreamly Active and pre
released Novembers strains
02/11/18 22:51:56 4.18S 102.16E 33.0 5.6M A SOUTHERN SUMATRA
02/11/20 21:32:31 35.53N 74.53E 33.0 5.8M A NORTHWESTERN KASHMIR
11/26 00:48:21 51.69N 173.62W 69.2 5.6M A ANDREANOF ISL
11/26 00:48:14 51.63N 173.59W 20.6 5.9M A ANDREANOF ISL, ALEUTIAN IS
1: really I must apologizs
2: for not maintaining this site
3: once activity dies down
4: {becomes less than expected}
5: ( my interest level )
6: { which reallys not very great to begin with}
7: (Goes right out the window}
8: {and down to near or below? zero}
9: & I of course do NOT know how to do a web search
10 IN Nov & December for the number &
1: Location of Earth Quakes between
2: 5.6 &6.5 world wide
3: {yes I include the moon }
4: (Quit nit picking}
5:-------------------------
6:now where was I {i forget easily}
7:================================
8:Ok way below Average #'s for Nov Dec
9:in the 2002 Active Quake season
20 Because October was so over active
1: OBViously
2:But back to the complaints
3: YES YES almost ever day
4:using the 386 I dial in to a BBs
5:that follows the daily Quakes
6: So really i've no actuall excuse
7: except its just 2boring for words
8:???/

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-12-02 18:44 ]</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-12-22 05:59 ]</font>

2002-Jul-18, 08:27 AM
<a name="20020718.12:15"> page 20020718.12:15 aka CharKing
On 2002-05-08 14:10, HUb' wrote: To: 4 CHUEN 5 XUL
http://www.viser.net/~charking/
1: Just now: I was listening to Coast To Coast
2: with Art Bell & Charlotte's on: See link above
beskeptical
Amazing. I check the SOHO site daily
http://www.spaceweather.com/
http://www.maj.com/sun/noaa.html
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?topic=1771&forum=2&6
Now concerning this story The Quake happens
about 50 hours after the event [IF ITs A HIT]?
I did look for a quake associated with the solar event
and I did not see any ? however my data was cut at a critical time :6:09 P.M. PST

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-08-01 22:15 ]</font>

2002-Jul-18, 10:08 AM
<a name="20020718.1:52"> page 20020718.1:52 aka Xray Flare / CME ?
<A HREF="http://www.solar.ifa.hawaii.edu/ARMaps/armaps.html">
1: get spot number & location from hawaii </A>
<A HREF="gopher://solar.sec.noaa.gov/11/plots/xray">
2: get event time from Geos 8-9 xray </A>
<A HREF="http://www.nso.noao.edu/synoptic/synoptic.html">
3: check magnetic image from noao </A>
1: its been years ago now : Maybe those still "WORK"
2: Anyway JD2452474 theres a report of an X-Class
3: & my figure for Solar Event {x} to
4: ERq {Earth Responce Quake} [ IF 1 occures ]
5:has been 50 hours from x to Q
6: so i'll research this ONE more and edit
7: this report later
8: 1:58 A.M. at this time I doubt there will
9: be a 6.0 or a 6.9 {but wh knows}
10 now on with the TAIL
1: its off season for Lunar triggared Earth
2: Quakes caused by the Perigee of the Moon
3: coinsiding with the Moon at New Or Full
4: in Oct-Nov-DEC its "NEW" and the 5.6 - 6.5
5: Quake activitys about 1/2 what it will be
6: in OCT-Nov-Dec etc.. in fact its a rather
7: Quiet, Quiet period
8: So back to x & ErQ 2:03 A.M. PST/2:08 A.M. it looks like
9:the links still "WORK" though i've not viewed the downloads
20filename: latest.gif ?2:25 A.M. ? X=#30 & 36 has Aim
A.20020718_xray.gif 2:25 A.M. it was 7/18@9Z {?} +50 = 7/20@11Z
B.a filename: pm4.jpg / I got a download from each & Will do so soon
I could "NOT" decode pm4.jpg (not that it matters) [Thumbs down]
HUb' 2-7-18 in responce to b.$'s
120 mag 6.x & 800 mag 5.x [I use 5.6 to 6.5]
60 .+. ......400 ?=450 / 4 for 3 month season = 110ish [suspect it]? or 110/3 = 40 / Month {i dont think so}
nOON October 25, 2002 {PICKED UP tvi/RFI} SEE October 25, 2002
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-07-19 00:30 ]</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-10-25 17:41 ]</font>

beskeptical
2002-Jul-18, 10:35 AM
I've never heard of CharKing. It wasn't too hard to predict Mt St Helens was going to have a large eruption. It was deforming upward some 10 feet a day! It's unfortunate the scientists didn't heed their own warnings.

From the link Ms King said regarding the day before the May 18th eruption, "She was particularly concerned about a troop of scouts who had chosen that weekend to hike into Spirit Lake and retrieve some of their gear that was kept at the mountain..."

I find that pretty hard to swallow. Spirit Lake was definitely in the 'Red Zone'. Except for the researchers and a few residents, only a limited number of loggers were supposed to be there, and only to work. I can't imagine any scouts hiking in to get their gear though I can't say I checked into the story.

Ms King also talks about Mammoth Lakes in California. Well that's certainly old news. The caldera there was active, and it most likely will erupt again. But in the last several years the activity has decreased considerably.

Besides being a Sun watcher, I also check the EQ sites. Guess I just like excitement. /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif Quakes are another one of those things that occur every day in large numbers. I'd be more nervous if they stopped for a day than if they increased.

Locally, we have had Mag 8-9 quakes here every 300 to 500 years. The last big one was 350 years ago. I do carry EQ insurance on my house. And our block is organized somewhat. We have jobs assigned like a team to shut off gas valves, one for first aid, one to babysit pets and kids if someone can't get home. Stuff like that. Amazingly our last significant quake, (7.1), didn't even knock stuff off my shelves, and my shelves are covered on every square inch with 'neat stuff'. My house wasn't in the jello bowl I guess. I certainly got to feel the ground go up and down for almost a minute. That is a long quake for those of you who don't have experience with them.

Here's some good sites from my bookmarks for real time EQ reports. You can surf the links and find your area. You can also find how many quakes occur annually around the world. On average there are at least a couple mag 7-9 every year. There are hundreds of mag 6s and thousands of smaller ones. There has been no significant changes in the stats. We just get more international news.

Worldwide:
http://wwwneic.cr.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/

You might notice Dave from Japan lives on shaky ground.

For the Northwest with links to the rest of the US:
http://spike.geophys.washington.edu/recenteqs/

For Canada:
http://www.pgc.nrcan.gc.ca/seismo/table.htm


For real time seismographs from our local volcanoes:
http://www.ess.washington.edu/SEIS/PNSN/WEBICORDER/welcome.html

It has been noted that there are more EQs where the plates sink into the deep trenches than the opposite side where the plates are spreading. The speculation is that the weight of the denser, cooler plate edge pulls it down stretching it out. I thought that was interesting.

beskeptical
2002-Jul-19, 02:33 AM
Not to bore you all some more but I looked up the annual average number of quakes in the world as monitored by USGS:

http://wwwneic.cr.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/eqstats.html

One mag 8 or greater
18 mag 7.x
120 mag 6.x
800 mag 5.x
6200 mag 4.x (estimated because not all are monitored at mag 4.9 or less)
49,000 mag 3.x
9,000 per DAY at mag 2.9 or smaller.

Like I said, I'd be more concerned if they stopped.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: beskeptical on 2002-07-18 22:34 ]</font>

David Hall
2002-Jul-19, 05:51 AM
On 2002-07-18 06:35, beskeptical wrote:
You might notice Dave from Japan lives on shaky ground.


Thanks for remembering me! /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif

Yes, it's well known that Japan is one of the most geologically active areas of the world. It has the most active volcanoes and I believe the greatest number of earthquakes.

But that said, I was surprised to discover when I got here just how rare it is to have a noticeable earthquake in my area. The Osaka-Kobe-Kyoto area seems to be much less active than the Tokyo area. I only experience maybe 2-3 noticable earthquakes a year, if that much. In the six years that I've been here I've only been in 3 quakes of any size, all about mag 3.0-3.5. In fact they were all really the outskirting waves of stronger quakes farther away. There just hasn't been that much activity directly under my feet that I know of.

Not to say that there isn't any danger. I know several people who were in the 1995 Kobe quake, and when I first visited Kobe about 2 years later I could still see signs of the damage it caused.

The worrying thing is, then, that the infrequency of large quakes lends a false sense of security. They still say a big one might hit this area within the next 100 years or so, so I worry a little. Doesn't a lack of small quakes sometimes mean that pressure is building up to a breaking point?

ZaphodBeeblebrox
2002-Jul-19, 10:35 AM
On 2002-07-18 22:33, beskeptical wrote:
Like I said, I'd be more concerned if they stopped.




On 2002-07-19 01:51, David Hall wrote:
Doesn't a lack of small quakes sometimes mean that pressure is building up to a breaking point?


Durn Tootin'

As beskeptical, Wisely Pointed Out, A Large Number of Small Quakes, is Preferable, to Even ONE Big One, Think about it This Way; A. Bell, is a Fun Thing to Touch, Just don't Try to Stop it From Vibrating!

2002-Aug-01, 10:44 AM
<a name="20020801.2:24"> page 20020801.2:24 aka Active 5.6-6.5 <pre>
1: July . Aug..: Sept ..| Oct ..: Nov ..| Dec
2:02 5.8|03 5.6|04 5.610/01 5.7.. November
3:03 6.0:07 5.8|06 5.910/01 5.8 . has so far
4:13 5.8|07 5.6|07 5.910/03 5.8 ! 2-11-18
5:17 5.6:07 5.8|11 5.610/03 5.7 ! been extreamly quiet
6:24 5.9|07 6.0|13 6.510/03 6.4 !
7:29 5.7:08 5.9|14 4.410/03 6.0 ! really
8:31 5.9|______|14 5.710/04 6.4 ! REALLY
9:29 5.6_______|15 6.510/07 5.7...Really
.....6.2|08 5.9|16 5.610/07 5.7...Quiet
........|09 6.1|16 6.310/08 6.0
2:____NO!______|16 5.810/10 6.7 !
3:_____I_______|17 6.110/10 6.0 ! no
4:____don't____|20 6.010/10 5.6 ! explination
5:__know__if___|20 6.310/10 6.0 ! given?
6:___July______|24 6.410/12 6.8
7:____&________|24 6.010/12 5.6
8:__Aug________|24 6.210/13 6.1
9:____data_____|24 6.310/13 6.0
20_____are_____|25 5.610/13 2.8 {13th}Lull
1:__complete___|26 5.710/14 5.6
2:__probably___|......10/14 6.1..
3:___"NOT"_____|......10/14 5.1..
4:_____________|......Lull{15th}.11/15 5.8
5:_____________|......10/16 6.2..11/15 6.4
6:_____________|......10/16 6.2..11/16 5.6
7:_____________|......10/16 6.1..11/17 7.5
8:_____________|......10/17 6.2 !
9:_____________|......10/17 6.2 !
30_____________|......10/19 5.9 !
1:_____________|......10/19 6.2 !
2:_____________|......10/19 6.2 !
3:_____________|......10/22 6.2
4:_____________|......10/23 6.7
5:_____________|......10/24 5.6 !
6:about 3 times|......10/24 6.3 !
7:the quake____|......10/24 5.6 !
8:activity_____|......HMM? 34 ?
9:_as the Quite|......WELL THATS IT
40_months______|......FOR oct
-----------------------------------as the Season winds down }
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-11-02 23:11 ]</font>
2-11-18 Nov Quakes update
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-11-07 20:16 ]</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-11-18 23:27 ]</font>

beskeptical
2002-Aug-01, 11:16 PM
I understand HUb' but you seem to be listing pretty meaningless data as it is presented. Many researchers have looked for patterns in EQ occurrences in their quests to predict quakes. No pattern has been found so far.

If you find more quakes for 3 months compared to 3 different months that might be interesting. But then you'd have to carry that through to look at larger samples and see if the pattern was a coincidence or a true pattern. That's already been done and there was no pattern.

2002-Sep-18, 11:52 PM
<a name="QUAKE?ANSWERS"> page QUAKE?ANSWERS aka QUAKE?ANSWERS
THE FIRST QUESTION TO ANSWERE of course would be the
oNE about it "has been proven" using historical Quake data
that no patter exists.. & I've seen those myself
A1. the way I avoid the logical positivist problem
to begin was not to look for Quake data.. but
to look for no Quake data [for example Lunar]
but i digress {anyway after searching 4myself}
I arived at the "LULL@1ST.1/4" WHICH most frequently
occurs two days AFTER the first Quarter.. And it was
That Lull that evenually broke the Quake Code .. so to speak
I have hi expectations of this Lull system.. tho i admitt there are times when it does not score a hi %, but on average its pretty good? better than any others i've encountered. HUb' 3:48 P.M. PST / 97209
September 26, 2002 2:23 P.M. PST now lets look at the prediction of the next message
of this thread: that there "absoultely nothing out of the ordinary about th" :{believe whateve you like} [ I like to believe it will be X_tra.Ordinary]

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-09-26 18:34 ]</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-10-01 22:36 ]</font>

JS Princeton
2002-Sep-19, 02:39 AM
Hub', there is absoultely nothing out of the ordinary about the earthquakes. I have no idea why you persist in this.

2002-Sep-19, 03:52 PM
<a name="September 26, 2002"> LINE = September 26, 2002 aka September 26, 2002
On 2002-09-18 22:39, JS Princeton wrote: To: no time stamp HUb' ?? 22 ??
Hub', there is absoultely nothing out of the ordinary about the earthquakes. I have no idea why you persist in this.
aaaaaaah A true critic of HUb' time
How I L'm
anyway espically the one who do use a negative..
NOW about nothing Xtrodanary about the upcomming series
{by that i mean 10-11-12 = Oct-Nov=Dec}
And sun spots Line below will link to sun spots
0: link to sun spot goes here {HUb'}

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-09-26 18:37 ]</font>

2002-Sep-20, 10:45 AM
On 2002-08-01 19:16, beskeptical wrote: To: 486/100 HUb'
I understand HUb' but you seem to be listing pretty meaningless data as it is presented. Many researchers have looked for patterns in EQ occurrences in their quests to predict quakes. No pattern has been found so far.

If you find more quakes for 3 months compared to 3 different months that might be interesting. But then you'd have to carry that through to look at larger samples and see if the pattern was a coincidence or a true pattern. That's already been done and there was no pattern.


Yes:yes. I know logical positivist have done as you say
and sure i disagree with "THE" finding.. OK? [A1] try http://www.lehappy.com [Q2:] well no question i do try to keep up {I know i cant} [&3?] lemme look again: Yeah/yeah Time frame:pattern? the time frame= 14&3/4 Earth days {1/2 Lunar cycle} & pattern = Lullat1st.1/4 something like that anyway but the at sign {SHIFTED2} has another function here so I skiped{replaced it with spellin?
for example THEY did not even find "LULL@1st.1/4" and if you do a search U2 can find "THIS". LULL:

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-09-21 11:46 ]</font>

David Hall
2002-Sep-20, 01:38 PM
I don't see any problem with HUb' searching for patterns in earthquakes. I mean, at worst he's just wasting his time in a fruitless search, and at best he might actually uncover something useful. In any case, if it makes him happy, great.

Good luck HUb', and if you find anything, be sure to let us know about it, ok?

GrapesOfWrath
2002-Sep-20, 06:21 PM
On 2002-09-20 09:38, David Hall wrote:
In any case, if it makes him happy, great.
The mark of a true scientist, knowledge for knowledge's sake. /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif

beskeptical
2002-Sep-21, 08:15 AM
There's nothing wrong with looking for a pattern, but how you determine if there is one needs to follow a line of scientific inquiry, not merely listing anecdotal coincidences.

For example, decide what events you think correlate with EQs. List all of those events. List all EQs of whatever magnitude during whatever timeframe you think correlate. Is there a pattern?

2002-Sep-22, 10:41 AM
<a name="20020922.2:2"> page 20020922.2:2 aka push to TOP
On 2002-09-21 04:15, beskeptical wrote: To!


For example, decide what events you think correlate with EQs. List all of those events. List all EQs of whatever magnitude during whatever timeframe you think correlate. Is there a pattern?

http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?topic=1262&forum=1#20020508.Q

ok upcomming: its 10/(2,3,&4) as i recall {just a sec} [Checking]
now back to Answers Abouve ? in thread to shorten thread ? {maybe}

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-09-22 06:44 ]</font>

2002-Sep-28, 05:58 AM
<a name="20020927.9:42"> page 20020927.9:42 aka perigee?
<pre>
2452525 PERIGEE 358758 KM | FROM what i call
2452539 2002 , 9 , 21 FULL | ASTROnOMY programs
2452540 APOGEE 406342 KM | {which i don't trust}
2452553 2002 , 10 , 5 NEW | (it gives 10/5 as New)?
2452554 PERIGEE 356933 KM | here A & P
2452567 APOGEE 406364 KM | / occurs between N & F
2452568 2002 , 10 , 20 FULL | inplying a shorter cycle
2452582 PERIGEE 358170 KM |-------------------------
2452583 2002 , 11 , 4 NEW | anyway i would mostly
2452594 APOGEE 405794 KM | like to include
2452598 2002 , 11 , 19 FULL | MOON: North & South
2452610 PERIGEE 362296 KM | dates also
2452612 2002 , 12 , 3 NEW | HOWEVRE: I DO NOT
2452622 APOGEE 404913 KM | have a program for that
</pre>
note? based upon this data the Active Season
should "HAVE" included Sept(9) with <=553 583 ? checking??
"WOULD" include the month of September
AS: the perigee occurs 1 day prior to New
& the Perigee is near its Min {in Oct}
thus?/? Sept may well be more active than Dec?
----
So: Sure i admitt the patterns do not fit
PRECISLY :: but the "LULL@1ST.1/4" should
be seen in a close look at the Quake data

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-09-28 07:57 ]</font>
i cannot understand Why this does not Align?
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-09-30 09:49 ]</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-09-30 23:19 ]</font>

GrapesOfWrath
2002-Sep-28, 08:07 AM
On 2002-09-28 01:58, HUb' wrote:
"WOULD" include the month of September
AS: the perigee occurs 1 day prior to New
& the Perigee is near its Min {in Oct}
thus?/? Sept may well be more active than Dec?

Hey, September is about over. The time to make predictions about September was last month. /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif

The new moon in September was in the first week, and the next new moon will be towars the end of the first week of October.

So: Sure i admitt the patterns do not fit
PRECISLY :: but the "LULL@1ST.1/4" should
be seen in a close look at the Quake data

Show me. (I'm not from Missouri, but I have cousins there)

2002-Sep-28, 12:13 PM
On 2002-09-28 04:07, GrapesOfWrath wrote: To? 4:52 A.M. PST


On 2002-09-28 01:58, HUb' wrote:
"WOULD" include the month of September {searching} time out drats
the datas just above the 64k limit of the buffer so later 4this1 4:55 A.M.
:: problem with snipper? hmm? 4:58 A.M. hm? 5:00 A.M.
page 20020801.2:24 aka Active 5.6-6.5

Hey, September is about over. The time to make predictions about September was last month. /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif1: July . Aug..: Sept ..| Oct ..: Nov ..| Dec

The new moon in September was in the first week, and the next new moon will be towars the end of the first week of October.
2:02 5.8|03 5.6|04 5.6
why do i skip lines with an upload? 5:06 A.M. dont know
3:03 6.0:07 5.8|06 5.9 maybe the lull was 5th?

Show me. (I'm not from Missouri, but I have cousins there)4:13 5.8|07 5.6|07 5.9
3:03 6.0:07 5.8|06 5.9 maybe the lull was 6th?

2002-Sep-28, 12:28 PM
On 2002-09-28 08:13, HUb' wrote: to HUb' 5:10 A.M. Math hour


On 2002-09-28 04:07, GrapesOfWrath wrote: To? 4:52 A.M. PST


On 2002-09-28 01:58, HUb' wrote:
5:11 A.M. with the computer problems I was
currently having there was no way to reply
in any sencicall way.. Just a min i look at
a calander :: {time passes from 5:13 A.M.
5:13 A.M. the Cal said the 1st.1/4 was the 13th
so the "LULL@1ST.1/4" should hav been on the 15th of 9
now will the buffer reach it?
he he its looks like a gotcha good as from the 13th thru
the 15th and beyiound there were several 6's
reported to have occured..
So Yeah scor it 1 for HUb' na sayer[$] and 0.0 for HUb'
now back to computer problem # 5:19 A.M.
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?topic=1262&forum=1&19#20020508.Q

2002-Sep-29, 12:28 AM
<a name="20020928.4:12"> page 20020928.4:12 aka E_Quake Round
<pre>-------------------
Rev 98-10-21 4ea2yr "Jiggle O' Quakes" = 1ea8yr "ROUND" of Quakes
NEW 97-98 FULL| NEW 99-00 FULL| NEW 01-02 FULL| NEW 03-04 FULL|
JD2450ooo+ | JD2451ooo+ | JD2451ooo+ | JD2452ooo+ |
.:... SFSF ....|..:... SWSW ....|..:... FSFS ....|..:.. WSWS ....|
1 9 / 1 23| 1 17 1 31| 1 24 949>2 8| 1 2 1 18
2 7<487 2 22| 2 16 3 2| 2 23 / 3 9| 2 1 2 16
3 9 3 24| 3 17 3 31| 3 25JD245 4 8| 3 3 3 18
4 7 4 22| 4 16 / 4 30| 4 232ooo+ 5 7| 4 1 4 16
5 6 5 22| 5 15<314 5 30| 5 23 6 6| 5 1 776/5 16
6 5 6 20| 6 13 6 28| 6 21 7 5| 5 31 6 14
7 4 7 20| 7 13 7 28| 7 20 / 8 4| 6 29 7 13
8 3 8 18| 8 11 8 26| 8 19<141 9 2| 7 29 8 12
9 1 708>9 16| 9 9 9 25| 9 17 10 2| 8 27 9 10
10 1 /10 16| 10 9 10 24| 10 16 11 1| 9 26 10 10
10 31 11 14| 11 8 11 23| 11 15 11 30| 10 25/ 11 9
11 30 12 14| 12 7 535>12 22| 12 14 12 30| 11 23968 12 8
12 29 1 12| 1 6 / 1 21| 1 13 1 28| 12 23 1 7
1 28 2 11| 2 5 2 19| 2 12 2 27| 1 21 2 6
2 26 3 13| 3 6 3 20| 3 14 362>3 28| 2 20 3 6
3 28 / 4 11| 4 4 4 18| 4 12 / 4 27| 3 20 4 5
4 26930 5 11| 5 4 5 18| 5 12 5 26| 4 19 3ooo+5 4
5 25 6 10| 6 2 6 16| 6 10 6 24| 5 19 6 3
6 24 7 9| 7 1/ 7 16| 7 10 7 24| 6 17 189>7 2
7 23 1ooo+8 8| 7 31757 8 15| 8 8 8 22| 7 17 / 7 31
8 22 9 6| 8 29 9 13| 9 7 ? 9 21 / 8 16 8 30
9 20 10 5| 9 27 10 13| 10 6|553 10 21| 9 14 9 28
10 20 122|11 4| 10 27 11 11| 11 4|583 11 20| 10 14 10 28
11 19 |12 3| 11 25 12 11| 12 4 12 19| 11 12 11 26
12 18 / 1 | 12 25 1 9| 1 2 1 18| 12 12 12 26
-----In this revision it appears that a sequence 8,8,7,7,8,8,7,7
PARAHILLIONS take place. So the day counts 221,221,194,194,221,221
=============
</pre>
1:It seams rather clear that Sept 2002 "WAS"
2:a part of an Active season .. So I would
3: {um After the fact} say [maybe I made a mistake]
4:way back in 98 placing the < time when New
5:Moon matched Lunar perigee as being 11(Nov)
6:and it's possible that mark should be 10(oct)
7:i will look at this furthor as a Xtraordanary
8:detail [Yes I do make mistakes] & sure
9:when its wronge it should be detectable // 2-9-30
this page represents a full eight(9) year
Earth Quake Round: [No it does not sync perfectly]
however the patterns predictable FAR OUT
as long as your data for New{Full} Moon
and perigee are correct? September 28, 2002 4:19 P.M. PST
October 1, 2002 ? I though I put 553 on here befor?
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-09-30 09:43 ]</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-10-01 22:43 ]</font>

2002-Sep-30, 02:13 PM
<a name="20020929.6:45"> POST 20020929.6:45 aka 553 ? 583 ? Sept
IT DOES SEAM: {in ind sight} that this partivular
"ACTIVE QUAKE SEASON" represents an
'extraordinary' event in that it may well be
"A THREE LULL SEASON" ei four actine months
instead of the usual 3 {and ii dd not detect the detail}
[when i constructed the columns back in '98]
so yeah yeah; I say its the difference between
N & L between astronomy & astrology?
Not sure i can adaquatly exolain this:
nut behind the construction of the Columns
lies the principal {an astrological one}
that there does exist a conJoining (in TIME}
of {in this case} the New Moon & its Perigee?
And for this active season {an Extraordinary one}
that date falls in two seperate months [10&11]
{Oct & Nov} & I did mis this "signifiant detail" WHEN
in '98 { I ran for US Senate fromthe state of OR}
against the then two Very powerfull US Senators
FROM STATE {and they both Quit} So explain to me
Why "BOTH" in terms of Astronomy? Hmm?/?
So its back to TV watching 4me
and I see now {yesy I ran for Governor}
No the Governor did not run 4it
that TV says ther are 3 Can_Dates
in the race today? Y 3? will you explain
why there are three [When the primaries are over?? Hu?
<pre>
8 22 9 6| 8 29 9 13| 9 7 / 9 21| 8 16 8 30
9 20 10 5| 9 27 10 13| 10 6 |553 10 21| 9 14 9 28
10 20 122|11 4| 10 27 11 11| 11 4|583 11 20| 10 14 10 28
11 19 |12 3| 11 25 12 11| 12 4 12 19| 11 12 11 26
12 18 / 1 | 12 25 1 9| 1 2 1 18| 12 12 12 26
-----In this revision it appears that a sequence 8,8,7,7,8,8,7,7
PARAHILLIONS take place. So the day counts 221,221,194,194,221,221
=============
</pre>
1:It seams rather clear that Sept 2002 "WAS"
2:a part of an Active season .. So I would
3: {um After the fact} say [maybe I made a mistake]
4:way back in 98 placing the < time when New
5:Moon matched Lunar perigee as being 11(Nov)
6:and it's possible that mark should be 10(oct)
7:i will look at this furthor as a Xtraordanary
8:detail [Yes I do make mistakes] & sure
9:when its wronge it should be detectable // 2-9-30
this page represents a full eight(9) year
Earth Quake Round: [No it does not sync perfectly]
however the patterns predictable FAR OUT
as long as your data for New{Full} Moon
and perigee are correct? September 28, 2002 4:19 P.M. PST

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-09-30 09:43 ]</font>
and this port city's in Blokaid? could it be Warf?

2002-Oct-11, 08:54 PM
<a name="JD2452559"> page JD2452559 aka Push A 7 to page 1
anyway? A 7 falls out "ABOVE" the Lunar Responce window
& I do :"NOT": rule out this was Solar Driven
I will try to provide links {later}

'extraordinary' event in that it may well be

10/10 10:50:20 1.71S 134.16E 10.0 7.6M A IRIAN JAYA REGION, INDONESIA
10/10 12:27:52 1.47S 134.17E 10.0 5.5M A IRIAN JAYA REGION, INDONESIA
10/10 12:28:25 1.48S 133.97E 10.0 6.7M A IRIAN JAYA REGION, INDONESIA
10/10 12:29:35 1.30S 133.91E 10.0 6.0M A IRIAN JAYA REGION, INDONESIA
10/10 13:52:28 7.27N 126.61E 33.0 5.1M B MINDANAO, PHILIPPINES
10/10 21:19:58 1.42S 134.10E 10.0 5.7M A IRIAN JAYA REGION, INDONESIA

A 7 yes & even a 6.7 fall "above" Lunar triggerd

And for this active season {an Extraordinary one}
that date falls in two seperate months [10&11]

1:00 P.M. & their4 its possible it was Solar Driven {search underway}
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?topic=1262&forum=1&23#20020718.1:52
aka Xray Flare / CME ?
Why "BOTH" in terms of Astronomy? Hmm?/?
So its back to TV watching 4me Ch 8 at 5 2-10-11

1:12 P.M. Well 10/10 part of the Active 3 days
So its may {still checking} be both Solar & Lunar ?
7:18 A.M. 2-10-12 I did an X-Ray exam and found "NO" X
so near as i see the 7 was not from the SUN
<pre>
8 22 9 6| 8 29 9 13| 9 7 / 9 21| 8 16 8 30
9 20 10 5| 9 27 10 13| 10 6 |553 10 21| 9 14 9 28
10 20 122|11 4| 10 27 11 11| 11 4|583 11 20| 10 14 10 28
11 19 |12 3| 11 25 12 11| 12 4 12 19| 11 12 11 26
12 18 / 1 | 12 25 1 9| 1 2 1 18| 12 12 12 26
-----In this revision it appears that a sequence 8,8,7,7,8,8,7,7
PARAHILLIONS take place. So the day counts 221,221,194,194,221,221
=============
</pre>
7:20 A.M. 2-10-12 My current opinion was?
that this seven WAS of Lunar Trigger verity
whic would be X_tra.0rdinary & make Oct02
an extraordinarlly active period now what did i callit?
{OH YES NOW I REMember an applause to be followed son by a LULL watch 4that
6:and it's possible that mark should be 10(oct)
7:i will look at this furthor as a Xtraordanary
8:detail [Yes I do make mistakes] & sure
9:when its wronge it should be detectable // 2-9-30

8:34 A.M. 2-10-13 /486 AGAIN: i DID NOT find an X class
event from the Sun {on geos 8/9} that corolates with these 11/10
quakes .. So I can only say "THOSE SURE ARE BIG" for Lunar Triggered
which they do appear {at this time} to be
REMember its the X_tra.0rdinary that i seak4

and this port city's in Blokaid? could it be Warf?
block AIDs temp halted
TV has been reporting sky lab passes
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-10-11 17:05 ]</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-10-12 10:14 ]</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-10-13 11:27 ]</font>

Muchansclon/Planet 10?
2002-Oct-14, 12:34 PM
noway that short term eq forecasting, could be sucessful as Hu`b Claims

However Chilean Seismologists have forecasted with a accuracy rate of over 70%, quakes over long-term periods since the 30`s

I have personaly done some analisys of that data and found some thrilling, and shocking resluts:

Arica 2005, Mb 9
Punta Arenas 2012(end of the world,according to the mayas) and 2065 Mb 8!

Because Chile is my homecountry, i hope that my predictions does not fullfill themselves.
But it would prove, once and for all that the only forecast model for Eq:s is analytic and with NO ASTRONOMY in the mix! That would be the only positve, if these events occured on the forecasted dates!

2002-Oct-14, 02:02 PM
aka X_tra.0rdinary?
7:03 A.M. pdt October 14, 2002

http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?topic=2433&forum=2&3

i did download 2 ? .png {whatever those are}
new to me and will look at those soon
I also was unable to link to the origional1?
----------
again i was getting about 3k cps transfers
and the 640k one took about 3.? minutes
so its close to my max allowed time limit
of arounf 4
???????????????
now ? 'poise i say .. Earth first then SUN
using the 7 above in this thread .. that would mean
incomming . maybe a tacon pulsefron enterPRIZE {just kidding}
anyway an incomming GW from Earth B4 Sun direction {more later} Wheres venus seismos ? Mars?

2002-Oct-14, 02:31 PM
[quote]
On 2002-10-14 10:02, HUb' wrote:
aka X_tra.0rdinary?
7:34 A.M. pdt October 14, 2002



i did download 2 ? .png {whatever those are}

sO? yeah: I did "TRY" to view .PNG's and
I get the message something like:
" & what program would you like to use to do this"
{folowed by a long list of things i could click on }
NONE of the whitches much interest me HOWEVER
-------------------
i did notice while looking4 whitch whitch
that suddenly there did appear over on the
bottom left of the screen a small sized version
I can only assume it was the SUN (640K) &
then later the 130k .. I did discover by accident
thtat the end had to be .PNG and not .PGN i had entered at download by mistake? X. Hu?

David Hall
2002-Oct-14, 04:26 PM
On 2002-10-14 10:31, HUb' wrote:

i did download 2 ? .png {whatever those are}

sO? yeah: I did "TRY" to view .PNG's and
I get the message something like:
" & what program would you like to use to do this"
{folowed by a long list of things i could click on }
NONE of the whitches much interest me HOWEVER


.png is a relatively new picture format similar to .gif. It's specifically designed for web content. If you want to view them, you'll have to find an updated image viewer that can handle the format.

Added: Do you have the GIMP? You can open .png with it, and it's open source. I just downloaded the Winblows version, and it seems pretty powerful.

_________________
<font size="-1">PLEASE NOTE: Some quantum physics theories suggest that when the consumer is not directly observing this product, it may cease to exist or will exist only in a vague and undetermined state.</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: David Hall on 2002-10-14 12:31 ]</font>

2002-Oct-14, 09:10 PM
<a name="20021014.1:14"> page 20021014.1:14 _ P.M. PST aka ? GIMP?
On 2002-10-14 12:26, David Hall wrote: To: 1 CAUAC 13 YAK


On 2002-10-14 10:31, HUb' wrote
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?topic=1519&forum=1&54#1 CAUAC 13 YAK
i did download 2 ? .png {whatever those are}

sO? yeah: I did "TRY" to view .PNG's and
I get the message something like:
" & what program would you like to use to do this"
{folowed by a long list of things i could click on }
NONE of the whitches much interest me HOWEVER


.png is a relatively new picture format similar to .gif. It's specifically designed for web content. If you want to view them, you'll have to find an updated image viewer that can handle the format.

Added: Do you have the GIMP? You can open .png with it, and it's open source. I just downloaded the Winblows version, and it seems pretty powerful.

1:15 P.M. PST HUb' here thinks its an UNnix
language on a Window {Pain} {oh never mind}
No: and I don't want 1. My guess? In Jan?Feb
i'll head off int Mac Land. Land an old Mac
and hack at that. Donno Long time from now

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-10-14 17:28 ]</font>

2002-Oct-15, 01:23 PM
On 2002-10-14 12:26, David Hall wrote:


On 2002-10-14 10:31, HUb' wrote:

i did download 2 ? .png {whatever those are}
1 OF THOSE I MISS TITLED ON DOWNLOAD TO sum.pgn NOT .PNG
Directory of C:td

SUM PGN 136,770 10-14-02 1:42p SUM.PGN

NOW i FIND I CANNOT ACCESS IT TO DELETE OR RENME IT? ANY CLUES?/? WHAT2DO?


.png is a relatively new picture format similar to .gif. It's specifically designed for web content. If you want to view them, you'll have to find an updated image viewer that can handle the format.

Added: Do you have the GIMP? You can open .png with it, and it's open source. I just downloaded the Winblows version, and it seems pretty powerful.

_________________

2002-Oct-16, 01:24 PM
Skipping ahead to a new level
{and trying to find this level elsewhere}
( page 2 # 11 )
anyway1? the question has arisen
DUE TO AN X_tra.0rdinaraly active "Applause"
if there were precurser activities on Venus
{OR MARS / moon} prior to the 10/10 's
-------------------------------------
its no easy question
because even where seismic equipment has been located
"ON THE MOON"
================
I have not found a way to retrieve even old data
FROM A TIME WHEN THE EVENTS WERE PRIME TIME tv }
so yeah Boo 11/10&9
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
6:32 A.M. in a moment {long time actually}
6:32 A.M. to maryland Nine died
Brook HHHHHHHHHH art
???????????????????????????????
_________________Pentagon help
= flashing lights {vehicle tracks}
white shirts ? 6:33 A.M. loos moose
gas?car & clouds were Blue

ROCKwill Md.

2002-Oct-16, 11:58 PM
<a name="JD2452564"> page JD2452564 aka Lull at first quarter
its far FAR to active ofan ACTIVE QUAKE"applause"
to see this data very clearly .. i'll just say
02/10/13 20:55:10 14.65S 175.37W 33.0 6.1M
02/10/13 22:18:55 39.20N 106.62W 10.0 2.8M
02/10/14 14:12:43 41.34N 142.06E 57.9 6.1M
02/10/14 23:55:07 15.19S 69.43W 104.8 5.1M
02/10/15 05:56:21 48.79N 128.39W 10.0 4.1M
02/10/15 10:43:56 17.76S 178.75W 584.2 4.8M
02/10/16 10:12:21 51.89N 157.32E 101.7 6.2M
-------------
the 10/15 4.1 & 4.8
can be seen by me as a Lull
between the 6.1's on the 13th, 14th, & 16th
================
believe what you like
BUT I believe this to be the "Most Easily"
found sync point in the over all Quake pattern

2002-Oct-25, 09:36 PM
10/19 12:09:04 44.34N 149.80E 33.0 6.2M A KURIL ISLANDS
10/19 12:09:04 44.34N 149.80E 33.0 6.2M A KURIL ISLANDS
10/22 11:39:04 20.47S 178.62W 551.6 6.2M A FIJI ISLANDS R
10/23 11:27:18 63.62N 148.04W 10.0 6.7M A CENTRAL ALASKA
10/24 03:34:26 48.23N 154.40E 33.0 5.6M A KURIL ISLANDS
10/24 06:08:37 1.86S 29.02E 10.0 6.3M A LAKE TANGANYIKA
10/24 21:53:42 6.07N 94.45E 58.9 5.6M A NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA
1:
2:
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?topic=1262&forum=1#20020718.1:52
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?topic=1262&forum=1#20020801.2:24
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?topic=1262&forum=1&start=25#JD2452564
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?topic=1262&forum=1&start=25#October 25, 2002
7:
<a name="October 25, 2002"> LINE October 25, 2002 aka October 25, 2002
<a name="JD2452573.SF"> line JD2452573.SF aka Solar Flare ?
anyway? about 2 min after Noon October 25, 2002
I did pick up TVI & RFI which i TENTivLY identified as
Solar particles?/? So the must have been A Solar Flare
2 to nine days ago {in the Sothern Hemisphere}
{on the Approaching (W ) wing that hit here 2day ?

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-10-25 18:22 ]</font>

2002-Oct-25, 10:00 PM
<a name="JD2452573.sf2"> page JD2452573.sf2 aka nOOn 2-10-25
On 2002-07-18 22:33, beskeptical wrote: To? 1:57 P.M./23uct?/?
OK? i did look at the GEOS X-RAY plots
and at 18z there was an M spike
{so if the noon TVI/RFI came from there?}
23-18=5hrs ago = 3pmPDT-5 {does not ccompute
{{ anyway IF it was the 18Ucut THEN its high speed (2hr) HARD electrons}
if those there should be traces elsewhere as HI energy
My guess is that High Speed ride on broken
Fagnetic flux lines that extend Sun to Earth & back
and are not fast on there own but take a fast Magnetic Flux Taxi here2Earth
BE

9,000 per DAY at mag 2.9 or smaller.

Like I said, I'd be more concerned if they stopped.

on the 14th there was an X_Tra.0rdinary base shift
on Geos 8/9 and my guess? {Serius(the star)has sent signals to SUN so expect manUOv.or}

2002-Oct-31, 04:01 AM
<a name="JD2452578.CME"> page JD2452578.CME aka CME


<A HREF="http://www.solar.ifa.hawaii.edu/ARMaps/armaps.html">
1: get spot number & location from hawaii </A>
<A HREF="gopher://solar.sec.noaa.gov/11/plots/xray">
2: get event time from Geos 8-9 xray </A>
<A HREF="http://www.nso.noao.edu/synoptic/synoptic.html">
3: check magnetic image from noao </A>
those still "WORK"
2: Anyway JD2452474 theres a report of an X-Class
==============================
JD2452578 push to page 1 to follow a TV{ized}
CME report: it look to far South to hit Earth
{ but i could not see North | South }
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:

Colt
2002-Oct-31, 04:40 AM
We have been having many, small tremors lately, and some fairly large ones here. Of course this is Alaska though and I am paranoid so.. Who knows. -Colt

2002-Oct-31, 01:28 PM
<a name="2-10-31.OA"> page 2-10-31.OA aka Oct "Applause"
On 2002-10-30 23:40, Colt wrote: To? HUb's 5:30 A.M.
We have been having many, small tremors lately, and some fairly large ones here. Of course this is Alaska though and I am paranoid so.. Who knows. -Colt

the 2.'s are part of the "Eposodic Uplift"
{every 2000th year (last was 0)
the Pacific NW uplifts about 400 feet in 400
years} about .5 to a foot a year.. appearently using small <3. Quakes.
exactly how many per 100 feet i've not deduced.. don't confuss those with the
5.6-6.5 Quakes of the Lunar cycle.. different trigger source ..? believe whaterev you like.. My guess the TV will no grt TVi from this

Chief Engineer Scott
2002-Oct-31, 05:41 PM
Hey HU'b, have you included the 3.9's and 5.0's recently from England? The first was the 5.0 at Dudley (West Midlands), and has been followed by a 3.9 with multiple aftershocks at Manchester.

Zathras
2002-Oct-31, 05:49 PM
And don't forget the major quake in Italy this morning- 5.6 is the tenative reading.

Colt
2002-Oct-31, 08:33 PM
We had a 6.5 just south of Denali Nation Park here the other day. Also lately I have been feeling a strange vibration in the ground, it only last for about a second then goes away. Of course when I ask if anyone else feels it they say no.

2002-Nov-01, 12:31 AM
<a name="JD2452579.ESR"> page JD2452579.ESR aka England Swings A Rattle
On 2002-10-31 12:41, Chief Engineer Scott wrote:
Hey HU'b, have you included the 3.9's and 5.0's recently from England? The first was the 5.0 at Dudley (West Midlands), and has been followed by a 3.9 with multiple aftershocks at Manchester.
4:33 P.M. pst ok i'll second the motion
{um just a second i have to look to find seconds}
E:T 16:34:02.21 Thu 10-31-2002 ===>
there,
Now about the inclusions?
{lemme thin} Lunar Triggered 5.6 to 6.5
Solar CME Responce 6.96 and Semi4 Signals From Sirus { um i forget was it 4.44 } 4the moon ? or Venus bact to tv ? Gun commercial:: Police story

2002-Nov-01, 01:12 AM
<a name="JD2452579.it"> page JD2452579.it aka iTALy
On 2002-10-31 12:49, Zathras wrote:
And don't forget the major quake in Italy this morning- 5.6 is the tenative reading.
--------
the Quake you refer to was ?
? the lead story on Ch8 NBC
see the TV news link page
{line to TV links}{later}

beskeptical
2002-Nov-02, 07:16 AM
Why are you choosing this quake and that, here and there? I think I posted this link before:

http://wwwneic.cr.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/

There are hundreds of sites tracking quakes worldwide in real time. There are thousands of Mag 5 quakes annually, hundreds of Mag 6s, and a few 7s and occasional 8s every year. The pattern follows plate movements, not the Moon's pull nor Sunspots.

Sigh.

GrapesOfWrath
2002-Nov-02, 01:16 PM
On 2002-11-02 02:16, beskeptical wrote:
http://wwwneic.cr.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/

There are hundreds of sites tracking quakes worldwide in real time. There are thousands of Mag 5 quakes annually, hundreds of Mag 6s, and a few 7s and occasional 8s every year.
From a link on that page: Significant Earthquakes of the World for 2002 (http://wwwneic.cr.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/sig_2002.html), "Earthquakes of magnitude 6.5 or greater or ones that caused fatalities, injuries or substantial damage."

2002-Nov-02, 05:08 PM
<a name="2-11-02.CME"> page 2-11-02.CME aka CME 2-11-02
A FEW DAYS AGO tv REPORTED A cme
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?topic=1262&forum=1&start=25#JD2452578.CME
AND i DID get a little RFI {no TVI} yesterday ? afternoon?
http://wwwneic.cr.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/
so i was pretty mild but some solar debris
must have hit earth from the SOLAR EVENT
From a link on that page: Significant Earthquakes of the World for 2002 (http://wwwneic.cr.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/sig_2002.html),
the extraOrdanry part of it is the PHASE of solar
activity {well never mind} 9:17 A.M. PST

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-11-02 12:13 ]</font>

GrapesOfWrath
2002-Nov-02, 07:36 PM
On 2002-11-02 12:08, HUb' wrote:
the extraOrdanry part of it is the PHASE of solar
activity {well never mind} 9:17 A.M. PST
I'd have to be convinced, but I encourage you to keep plugging away--science always should reinvestigate its premises. Otherwise, it's possible that a correlation between celestial events and earthquakes would be missed, should one ever occur. Although we haven't seen any in the past on Earth, we do know that quakes on other solar system bodies are effected. Perhaps we just haven't tried the right combination.

2002-Nov-03, 03:30 AM
<a name="JD2452581.7"> page JD2452581.7 aka 7.
On 2002-11-02 14:36, GrapesOfWrath wrote: To: November 2, 2002
Wel there was a 7. Quake yesterday in Sumatra?
Not that i've been following : but the 5. one in Italy
Made news `cause a school building collapsed
-------------------------
I guess my point would be {if i were going to make one}
{ not ] that some CME charged particles were
ariving on the Earths Surface during this time?
{believe whatever you like} BWYL

beskeptical
2002-Nov-03, 05:37 AM
I also agree researching any potential connections to EQs and other events is worthwhile. But research of this nature needs to be systematic and comprehensive to have any value. The solar data is out there. The EQ data is out there. Analyze it. To just say, "look we had an EQ and the Sun just sent us a CME", or whatever, is not evidence of anything but a coincidental event.

sigh.....
_________________
Evolution is just a theory. Better fasten your seatbelt, so is gravity.
Beskeptigal.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: beskeptical on 2002-11-03 00:38 ]</font>

2002-Nov-04, 04:08 PM
On 2002-11-03 00:37, beskeptical wrote:
I also agree researching any potential connections to EQs and other events is worthwhile. But research of this nature needs to be systematic and comprehensive to have any value. The solar data is out there. The EQ data is out there. Analyze it. To just say, "look we had an EQ and the Sun just sent us a CME", or whatever, is not evidence of anything but a coincidental event.

sigh.....
_________________WELL?/? of course your correct
with so little data its difficult to impossible to
say much of anything .. However now theres another 7. in Alaska?
I guess it was Argos pointed that out.. Sorry
I do not do well at the name game: see 2003 {later
{link line}

Colt
2002-Nov-04, 08:30 PM
Had another, fairly major, earthquake yesterday. 7.9, 200 miles north of Anchorage. It lasted for about 90 seconds. I wish someone would explain to me, in plain English, what is happening. -Colt

2002-Nov-05, 08:29 AM
<a name=2-11-05".CQ"> page 2-11-05.CQ aka Quake cycles
On 2002-11-04 15:30, Colt wrote: To? HUb'
Had another, fairly major, earthquake yesterday. 7.9, 200 miles north of Anchorage. It lasted for about 90 seconds. I wish someone would explain to me, in plain English, what is happening. -Colt
1st theres the Lunar Perigee at New or Full Moon
{ these Quakes tend to be in the 5.6 to 6.5 range}
2nd theres an Eposodic uplift taking place
{in the Pacific NW as whitnessed by the Alvord Desert}
{link to the Alvord goes here} these are 2. quakes
3rd Earth Responce Solar Triggerd Quakes
{ these are the big ones >6.9 and occur when solar particles hit Earth

Colt
2002-Nov-06, 12:37 AM
Oh. Makes you feel kind of special knowing those great balls of rock and burning gases pay attention to our small rock. /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif -Colt

2003-Oct-29, 02:59 PM
&lt;a name="20020718.1:52"> page 20020718.1:52 aka Xray Flare / CME ?
&lt;A HREF="http://www.solar.ifa.hawaii.edu/ARMaps/armaps.html">
1: get spot number &amp; location from hawaii &lt;/A>
&lt;A HREF="gopher://solar.sec.noaa.gov/11/plots/xray">
2: get event time from Geos 8-9 xray &lt;/A>
&lt;A HREF="http://www.nso.noao.edu/synoptic/synoptic.html">
3: check magnetic image from noao &lt;/A>
1: its been years ago now : Maybe those still "WORK"
2: theres a report of an "EVENT" on the 6oclock news today 10/29
3: &amp; my figure for Solar Event {x} to
4: ERq {Earth Responce Quake} [ IF 1 occures ]
5:has been 50 hours from x to Q
6: ok TV reports "A.B." {maybe today}
7: my numbers are still 2days PLUS 2hrs {BWUW}
8: and besides what i saw on TV was ( . ) solar centered
9: be a 6.0 or a 6.9 {but wh knows} SO NO SIX's do I see {this 1}
10 now on with the TAIL
1: its off season for Lunar triggared Earth ;;; ? "SEASON" in?
2: Quakes caused by the Perigee of the Moon
3: coinsiding with the Moon at New Or Full
4: in Oct-Nov-DEC its "NEW" and the 5.6 - 6.5 um 1st.14 = 11/1
5: Quake activitys about 1/2 what it will be
6: in OCT-Nov-Dec etc.. in fact its a rather
7: Quiet, Quiet period
8: So back to x &amp; ErQ 2:03 A.M. PST/2:08 A.M. it looks like
9:the links still "WORK" though i've not viewed the downloads
20filename: latest.gif ?2:25 A.M. ? X=#30 &amp; 36 has Aim
A.20020718_xray.gif 2:25 A.M. it was 7/18@9Z {?} +50 = 7/20@11Z
B.a filename: pm4.jpg / I got a download from each &amp; Will do so soon
I could "NOT" decode pm4.jpg (not that it matters) [Thumbs down]
HUb' 2-7-18 in responce to b.$'s
120 mag 6.x &amp; 800 mag 5.x [I use 5.6 to 6.5]
60 .+. ......400 ?=450 / 4 for 3 month season = 110ish [suspect it]? or 110/3 = 40 / Month {i dont think so}
nOON October 25, 2002 {PICKED UP tvi/RFI} SEE October 25, 2002
&lt;font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-07-19 00:30 ]&lt;/font>

&lt;font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-10-25 17:41 ]&lt;/font>yeah yeah see next edition?NEXT ED?
http://www.solar.ifa.hawaii.edu/ARMaps/armaps.html thats a 1
2= gopher://solar.sec.noaa.gov/11/plots/xray
3# http://www.nso.noao.edu/synoptic/synoptic.html
10/29 yeah yuckie yellow NEXT TRY?
i did not connect to gopher://solar.sec.noaa.gov {TRY#3}
---------------------------------------------------------yeah?YEAH...
based upon NO.Go.Mints.peppermint+flavor
my 4cast is 0
no hittum EArth this try!
====================
Wyh YoU ask
because its not "Approaching Edge" Launch site
but from the center of the circle. SoNo Flux
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::
it seams plaine and simple to me
and no NO. lights eithor
even tho there will be light reported
????????????????????????????????????
it just aint so .. pureEST dill_LUTUM

carolyn
2003-Nov-01, 08:19 PM
Had a thought the other day hub...

see what you think

global warming is melting the ice caps, presumably it is also decreasing the overall dencity of water, thermodynamics an all that (?) that then decreases the overall weight of the water sitting on the crust of the earth
less weight = less pressure. Less pressure = more movement of the mantle= more movement of the crust. Ta Da =D>

how does that sound? :o

man on the moon
2003-Nov-02, 03:49 AM
there is also a theory that water acts as a lubricant between faults. (doesn't necessarily mean i accept it, just have heard it).

think of it as a barometer. more water liquid, it has to go somewhere. rising sea levels is a good choice. maybe though the weight of the extra water on the water below pushes it into the faults or something (the same way air pressure pushes mercury harder so it rises up the tube.)

who knows. i don't. :-? just a thought.

carolyn
2003-Nov-02, 07:49 AM
further thoughts

last night in bed I was musing - just before I fell asleep I thought - actualy even though the volume changes the overall weight is probably a constant - bummer :cry:

but - yes man, I have heard that water lubricates fault lines to, read a paper on it some time ago, it suggested that where large damns have been built there is a small increase in siesmic activity in the surrounding area. will now try to find it.

by the way hub apparently there was a 6.6 earthquake in or near Japan thursday/friday time, hope that helps - will find the info and post.

ED FOR FOUND INFO
SUGGS
A major earthquake occurred at 01:06:28 (UTC) on Friday, October 31, 2003. The magnitude 7.0 event has been located OFF THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN. (This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.)

HOPE THIS HELPS

2003-Nov-06, 01:45 AM
further thoughts

last hub apparently there was a 6.6 earthquake in or near Japan thursday/friday time, hope that helps - will find the info and post.

ED FOR FOUND INFO
SUGGS
A major earthquake occurred at 01:06:28 (UTC) on Friday, October 31, 2003. The magnitude 7.0 event has been located OFF THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN. (This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.)

HOPE THIS HELPS
11/5 DARK BLUE
sorry:
i have not been paying attention!
i'll mend my way {maybe}
----------------------------------------
TRY1:? how about "A" link to your web site
that might work for US
============================
or try MINE.. http://web.pdx.edu/~pdx00782
click forum {not that it works .. really it does not}
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::
or try http://www.sailing.pdx.edu
click on PRESS:: May15 new:: then near the bottom :Feedback
???????????????????????????????????????????????
when all else fails ... UM I moniter FSR CH12
24hrs/day 7days/week .. but its a two block range ?
//tilt\\ in other words 12th and Jefferson {SW pdx}
now back to the regularly scheduled..{um? sixes}?

2003-Dec-01, 03:50 PM
density = 3? olive dec 1st 2003?
if anything did happen this season I missed it completely
{OK other than the Solar Non Events, i mean}