View Full Version : Turns Out There Is No Actual Looking Up

2016-Sep-10, 10:40 PM
Direction is something we humans are pretty accustomed to. Living in our friendly terrestrial environment, we are used to seeing things in term of up and down, left and right, forwards or backwards. And to us, our frame of reference is fixed and doesn't change, unless we move or are in the process of moving. But when it comes to cosmology, things get a little more complicated.
For a long time now, cosmologists have held the belief that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic - i.e. fundamentally the same in all directions. In this sense, there is no such thing as "up" or "down" when it comes to space, only points of reference that are entirely relative. And thanks to a new study by researchers from the University College London, that view has been shown to be correct.
For the sake of their study, titled "How isotropic is the Universe? (https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.07178)", the research team used survey data of the Cosmic Microwave Background (http://www.universetoday.com/110221/what-is-the-cosmic-microwave-background-radiation/) (CMB) - the thermal radiation left over from the Big Bang. This data was obtained by the ESA's Planck spacecraft between 2009 and 2013.
The team then analyzed it using a supercomputer to determine if there were any polarization patterns that would indicate if space has a "preferred direction" of expansion. The purpose of this test was to see if one of the basic assumptions that underlies the most widely-accepted cosmological model is in fact correct.
The first of these assumptions is that the Universe was created by the Big Bang, which is based on the discovery that the Universe is in a state of expansion, and the discovery of the Cosmic Microwave Background. The second assumption is that space is homogenous and istropic, meaning that there are no major differences in the distribution of matter over large scales.
This belief, which is also known as the Cosmological Principle (http://m.teachastronomy.com/astropedia/article/The-Cosmological-Principle), is based partly on the Copernican Principle (which states that Earth has no special place in the Universe) and Einstein's Theory of Relativity (http://www.universetoday.com/45484/einsteins-theory-of-relativity/) - which demonstrated that the measurement of inertia in any system is relative to the observer.
This theory has always had its limitations, as matter is clearly not evenly distributed at smaller scales (i.e. star systems, galaxies, galaxy clusters, etc.). However, cosmologists have argued around this by saying that fluctuation on the small scale are due to quantum fluctuations that occurred in the early Universe, and that the large-scale structure is one of homogeneity.
By looking for fluctuations in the oldest light in the Universe, scientists have been attempting to determine if this is in fact correct. In the past thirty years, these kinds of measurements have been performed by multiple missions, such as the Cosmic Background Explorer (http://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/product/cobe/) (COBE) mission, the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/) (WMAP), and the Planck spacecraft (http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Planck).
For the sake of their study, the UCL research team - led by Daniela Saadeh and Stephen Feeney - looked at things a little differently. Instead of searching for imbalances in the microwave background, they looked for signs that space could have a preferred direction of expansion, and how these might imprint themselves on the CMB.
As Daniela Saadeh - a PhD student at UCL and the lead author on the paper - told Universe Today via email:

"We analyzed the temperature and polarization of the cosmic microwave background (CMB), a relic radiation from the Big Bang, using data from the Planck mission. We compared the real CMB against our predictions (https://zenodo.org/record/48654#.V9R0uq2wiJc) for what it would look like in an anisotropic universe. After this search, we concluded that there is no evidence for these patterns and that the assumption that the Universe is isotropic on large scales is a good one."
Basically, their results showed that there is only a 1 in 121 000 chance that the Universe is anisotropic. In other words, the evidence indicates that the Universe has been expanding in all directions uniformly, thus removing any doubts about their being any actual sense of direction on the large-scale.
And in a way, this is a bit disappointing, since a Universe that is not homogenous and the same in all directions would lead to a set of solutions to Einstein's field equations. By themselves, these equations do not impose any symmetries on space time, but the Standard Model (of which they are part) does accept homogeneity as a sort of given.
These solutions are known as the Bianchi models, which were proposed by Italian mathematician Luigi Bianchi in the late 19th century. These algebraic theories, which can be applied to three-dimensional spacetime, are obtained by being less restrictive, and thus allow for a Universe that is anisotropic.
On the other hand, the study performed by Saadeh, Feeney, and their colleagues has shown that one of the main assumptions that our current cosmological models rest on is indeed correct. In so doing, they have also provided a much-needed sense of closer to a long-term debate.
"In the last ten years there has been considerable discussion around whether there were signs of large-scale anisotropy lurking in the CMB," said Saadeh. "If the Universe were anisotropic, we would need to revise many of our calculations about its history and content. Planck high-quality data came with a golden opportunity to perform this health check on the standard model of cosmology and the good news is that it is safe."
So the next time you find yourself looking up at the night sky, remember... that's a luxury you have only while you're standing on Earth. Out there, its a whole 'nother ballgame! So enjoy this thing we call "direction" when and where* you can.
And be sure to check out this animation produced by the UCL team, which illustrates the Planck mission's CMB data:
Further Reading: arXiv (https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.07178), Science (http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/09/it-s-official-you-re-lost-directionless-universe)

The post Turns Out There Is No Actual Looking Up (http://www.universetoday.com/130722/turns-no-actual-looking/) appeared first on Universe Today (http://www.universetoday.com).

More... (http://www.universetoday.com/130722/turns-no-actual-looking/)

2016-Sep-11, 12:51 AM
a much-needed sense of closer

Should that be "a much-needed sense of closure"?

Aye no eye of bin wading width baited breadth four this.

2016-Sep-11, 01:22 AM
I look up all the time; and see the artex of the ceiling above.