PDA

View Full Version : D.B. vs alien($)



2002-Jan-25, 05:16 PM
Board - View Topic (p1 of 2)
Donnie B.
From: Massachussetts, USA
Posted: 2002-01-25 09:31
The aliens are among us, and their name is HUb'...
[INLINE]
10:43 A.M. As you may? or may not know
I do "NOT" see the BIG picture just inLIne
however it may be worthy of more than 1 LIne
for my part i'll say the Oregon National Guard has been deployed to UTAH for the :"Winter": game HUb'10:45 A.M.

ChallegedChimp
2002-Jan-25, 05:27 PM
Ummm.if yall see a hairy backed knuckling off in a complete rout.... that'll be me.

My universal translator has no way of knowing if HUB just predicted the end of the world or not. I'll wait whilst the bigger bulging brains figure it out and then come out of hiding.

(been reading you for a while Hub, no offense intended)

Donnie B.
2002-Jan-25, 08:03 PM
Darn... where did I leave that Close Encounters (tm) Secret Decoder Ring?

2002-Jan-28, 07:42 AM
On 2002-01-25 15:03, Donnie B. wrote:
Darn... where did I leave that Close Encounters (tm) Secret Decoder Ring?


http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?topic=508&forum=1&8

2002-Jan-28, 07:49 AM
On 2002-01-25 12:27, ChallegedChimp wrote: TO? 2 AHAU 18 MUAN
that means today WAS the last day of this 20 day
Mayan Calendar ROUND and tomorrows Corn again
My universal translator has no way of knowing if HUB just predicted the end of the world or not. I'll wait whilst the bigger bulging brains figure it out and then come out of hiding.
Now theres no way for me to post MY forcast HERE
(been reading you for a while Hub, no offense intended)
1:16 A.M. About what i think the future holds
as it take 37 lines but i'll send 1 of 37
362>3 28 | it means to Xpect an Earthquake March 28th ?

GrapesOfWrath
2002-Jan-28, 12:26 PM
On 2002-01-28 02:49, HUb' wrote:
Xpect an Earthquake March 28th ?

How big an earthquake? There are lots of earthquakes every day.

ChallegedChimp
2002-Jan-28, 12:31 PM
Well, I am in Central Florida... hurricane, tsunami, tornado... them thing I gather me bananas about. But if a quake hits in a quake prone region on the 28th, I am DEFINATELY gathering as many fruits,nuts, and vegetables in the storeroom as possible.

Climbing up a doggone tree don't work versus them earth shaking dealies.

/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif

2002-Jan-29, 03:36 AM
On 2002-01-28 07:26, GrapesOfWrath wrote: To: 2 AHAU 18 MUAN

its Still 2day
On 2002-01-28 02:49, HUb' wrote:
Xpect an Earthquake March 28th ?

How big an earthquake? There are lots of earthquakes every day.
9:03 P.M. Bigger than 5.6 could be a 9 for all I care
and it will not be on the day I say that days the
Full moon day and its a day or 2 B4 and a day or 2/3 after also

2002-Jan-29, 03:41 AM
On 2002-01-28 07:31, ChallegedChimp wrote: To: 2 AHAU 18 MUAN
Well, I am in Central Florida... hurricane, tsunami, tornado... them thing I gather me bananas about. But if a quake hits in a quake prone region on the 28th, I am DEFINATELY gathering as many fruits,nuts, and vegetables in the storeroom as possible.

Climbing up a doggone tree don't work versus them earth shaking dealies.
Same song same verse listen as soon as I
/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif WORK UP THE DETAILS AND FIND THE lines
i'll pin the upcoming season down
to where when for how long how deep and all
the ** required 4u to be right and me Left

GrapesOfWrath
2002-Jan-29, 04:31 AM
On 2002-01-28 22:36, HUb' wrote:
Bigger than 5.6 could be a 9 for all I care
and it will not be on the day I say that days the Full moon day and its a day or 2 B4 and a day or 2/3 after also
That's not acceptable. There were 65 significant earthquakes (http://wwwneic.cr.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/01_EVENTS/summary.html), magnitude 6.5 or greater, last year alone. 5.6's happen every couple days. If you make it a four day window, you're almost guaranteed to see a 5.6 or bigger in that time frame. I'd be surprised if there weren't a 5.6 in any given four day period.

p9107
2002-Jan-29, 04:26 PM
Well... that's a bet he's sure to win then...

2002-Jan-29, 06:07 PM
On 2002-01-29 11:26, p9107 wrote:
Well... that's a bet he's sure to win then...

allright lemme thin
365.2442 / 65 may be Equill2 5.619 day Avg
Windows. Not Four! and besides I said 90/5
or 18 days! So Really I was telling the other
tails about DAYS when there are NO 5.6's
and that days 2 days after the Moon = 1st 1/4 comprenday?

GrapesOfWrath
2002-Jan-29, 06:19 PM
On 2002-01-29 13:07, HUb' wrote:

allright lemme thin
365.2442 / 65 may be Equill2 5.619 day Avg
Windows. Not Four! and besides I said 90/5
or 18 days! So Really I was telling the other
tails about DAYS when there are NO 5.6's
and that days 2 days after the Moon = 1st 1/4 comprenday?
Comprenday? You gotta be kidding. I'm all over this.

There were 65 6.5s. There were a lot more 5.6s.

2002-Jan-30, 12:08 PM
<a name="20020130a"> page 20020130a
On 2002-01-29 13:19, GrapesOfWrath wrote: To 4 IK 0 PAX


1:Having consulted an Astronomy program I can now
2:more precisly predict WHERE on "Earth" the 2,3,4
3:{When moons Full} to expect the expected Qauke's
4:because i do not know, the Astronomical WORD to
5:discribe this cycle i'll just try to explai it?
6:the moon Goes North And South & will be North
7:J,F,M when its full {all three months} & the
8:Quakes will be in the Norther Hemisphere! Alaska?
9:the moon crosses the Ecliptic on 1/10 1/25 2/6 2/21

There were 65 6.5s. There were a lot more 5.6s.
its pretty much true i've lost interest, 4Me its cast in stone Very Reliable, but believe what you like? 6.5's 6.9's the "Season" will be here soon, right on time, almost to the hour!

GrapesOfWrath
2002-Jan-30, 12:36 PM
On 2002-01-30 07:08, HUb' wrote:
its pretty much true i've lost interest, 4Me its cast in stone Very Reliable, but believe what you like? 6.5's 6.9's the "Season" will be here soon, right on time, almost to the hour!
But what is it exactly that you are predicting that doesn't already take place? It seems that you are predicting that the number of earthquakes will be the same as usual?

Or do you mean that the number of earthquakes around the next three full moons will be much greater than usual? (OK, we're just now finishing up with one of them, right?)

2002-Jan-30, 12:42 PM
<a name="20020130b"> page 20020130b
1:
2:
3:o a theoritical Season's of "Applause"(s) more like the following:
4: 7 7 7 7 7 7 Earths 2nd GW harmonic
5: Q-Q ?-Q q-Q Q-? Q-q .-Q {T_0's = "FULL" Moons}
6: <14&3/4> <14&3/4> <14&3/4> 14&3/4day GW Primary
7:/==F==/===N=1/4===F===/==N=1/4===F===/==N=1/4Moon NOTE !
8: 2/27 [2002] 3/28 [spring?] 4/27 | this methode predicts
9: "Lull" "Lull" | Lull's > Big EarthQuakes
--|=Applause| |=Applause| |=Applause|.............: aka Season
1:of course theres slop at eithor end for drills it's ESTABLISHED!-!
2:OK ? 6:07 A.M. once again Big Quakes comming
3: >6.07 and Febuary 27ths the Full Moon.
4: and "THIS" Quake's asociated with THAT.
5: Most probably it will be a day or two B4
6: and also a day or two after. & there are 12
7: not 6 Most probable moments, only about 2/3 of them are True however?

2002-Jan-30, 12:47 PM
<a name="20020130c"> page 20020130c
On 2002-01-30 07:36, GrapesOfWrath wrote: To: 6:14 A.M.


On 2002-01-30 07:08, HUb' wrote:
its pretty much true i've lost interest, 4Me its cast in stone Very Reliable, but believe what you like? 6.5's 6.9's the "Season" will be here soon, right on time, almost to the hour!
But what is it exactly that you are predicting that doesn't already take place? It seems that you are predicting that the number of earthquakes will be the same as usual?

Or do you mean that the number of earthquakes around the next three full moons will be much greater than usual? (OK, we're just now finishing up with one of them, right?)
[/quote]YES! ...?, that the number of Q's grater than 7.2
will be GREATER than the number in the past 3(three) Months When I would guess there were none? donno, like I said I lost nterest

GrapesOfWrath
2002-Jan-30, 01:39 PM
On 2002-01-30 07:47, HUb' wrote:
YES! ...?, that the number of Q's grater than 7.2
will be GREATER than the number in the past 3(three) Months When I would guess there were none? donno, like I said I lost nterest

The guess is wrong. This list (http://wwwneic.cr.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/sig_2001.html) shows four magnitude 7 earthquakes in the last three months of 2001. The one in QINGHAI, CHINA was 7.8, on Nov. 14, but some reports (http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200111/15/eng20011115_84597.shtml) list it as 8.1.

2002-Jan-31, 04:24 AM
<a name="20020130F"> page 20020130F <pre>
1:so a theoritical Season's of "Applause"(s) more like the following:
2: 7 7 7 7 7 7 Earths 2nd GW harmonic
3: Q-Q ?-Q q-Q Q-? Q-q .-Q {T_0's = "FULL" Moons}
4: <14&3/4> <14&3/4> <14&3/4> 14&3/4day GW Primary
5:/==F==/===N=1/4===F===/==N=1/4===F===/==N=1/4Moon NOTE !
6: 2/27 [2002] 3/28 [spring?] 4/27 | this methode predicts
7: "Lull" "Lull" | Lull's > Big EarthQuakes
8:|=Applause| |=Applause| |=Applause|.............: aka Season
9:of course theres slop at eithor end for drills it's ESTABLISHED!-!
DARN .. i forgot the [PRE so i have to repost
YES yes the AMount of energy released by quakes
in the next three months will be Greater Than the last 3 by a factor of THREE(3X) Si' es verdad ' ES VERdad </pre>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-02-02 09:39 ]</font>

GrapesOfWrath
2002-Jan-31, 12:51 PM
On 2002-01-30 23:24, HUb' wrote:
DARN .. i forgot the [PRE so i have to repost
And now you've forgotten the end /pre again. :)



On 2002-01-30 23:24, HUb' wrote:
YES yes the AMount of energy released by quakes
in the next three months will be Greater Than the last 3 by a factor of THREE(3X) Si' es verdad

The magnitude (http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/general/handouts/magnitude_intensity.html) of an earthquake is a logarithmic scale. The amount of energy released by a 8.0 mag. earthquake is thirty times the energy released by a 7.0 earthquake. So, one 8.0 earthquake would release the energy of 900 6.0 earthquakes.

Just one big earthquake in the next three months could do it. But that wouldn't be very surprising, either. Big earthquakes do happen occasionally.

ChallegedChimp
2002-Jan-31, 01:06 PM
Battle o' the brains... time for this monkey to run!

Bloody heck... just let me know if that a big earth shaker is centered near the southeastern portion of the USA (particulary that funny looking penisula sticking out). /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif
(you guys are great, and a tremondous stress relief from dealing with my 15 acre patch o' ground) /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif

2002-Jan-31, 01:18 PM
<a name="20020131C"> page 20020131C
On 2002-01-31 08:06, ChallegedChimp wrote: To: 6:41 A.M. PST
1: the ting that realy get 2me
2:I know when I get to 9
3: i wind up looking [DARNit]
4: so yeah once again
5:http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?topic=511#20020131C
6:listen why can there not be skip
7: :skip:to========================VIEWto#
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?topic=511&forum=3&start=50&51#20020130H

2002-Feb-02, 02:37 PM
On 2002-01-30 08:39, GrapesOfWrath wrote: To:2-2-02


On 2002-01-30 07:47, HUb' wrote:
YES! ...?, that the number of Q's grater than 7.2
will be GREATER than the number in the past 3(three) Months When I would guess there were none? donno, like I said I lost nterest

The guess is wrong. This list (http://wwwneic.cr.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/sig_2001.html) shows four magnitude 7 earthquakes in the last three months of 2001. The one in QINGHAI, CHINA was 7.8, on Nov. 14, but some reports (http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200111/15/eng20011115_84597.shtml) list it as 8.1.

Your Probably right, it hard for me to follow {no interest} i thought i saw a Dec 14th # tho

2002-May-26, 10:39 AM
<a name="20020526.2:35"> page 20020526.2:35 aka
On 2002-02-02 09:37, HUb' wrote: To: May 26, 2002 & 2-5-29

On 2002-01-30 08:39, GrapesOfWrath wrote: To:2-2-02
twas pushed from p9 to p1 for densit now COMpacted
E1? Solar Eruption's out of cycle ? > 10e30 ergs
well i dont have a spot to ERG calibrator
just a second come to think of it ITS 6 IMIX 15 ZIP
the start of a new Mayan 20 day Calender Round
E2? Earth Quakes {according to me} its the "OFF" season
and yes there are still 6's {I admit this much} ? e20's ?
E3? Major RIF 4cast I'll be talking KwHr Here
so yeah In/Pac or Pac/In in this round i'll say 9:11 0 EVEN

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-05-29 11:31 ]</font>