chriscurtis

2008-Sep-16, 02:18 PM

I really need someone’s help. I know its unethical but I will pay 100 bucks USD to the first person who can spot what is wrong.

Can you spot the flaw in this reasoning? I’m going crazy.

This was supposed to be an extension of the Theory of Everything based on E8 that Lisi published last year but without having to know the maths of E8. This work is complete but the result is really out there. The theory has changed into a proof by induction, which I didn’t think was possible for a theory in physics. It gets even weirder, the proof implies that it is the only theory in nature that can be proved because it can describe everything and yet cannot be simplified, in that it is irreducible.

Here it is. It’s a one liner too.

“Everything can be shown to be represented by just the units 0 and 1 as long as they are different”.

Here’s the “proof”.

First try and break the hypothesis by showing that we need least three different states to describe nature by starting from zero and increasing by one state and then another to make three states. We will start from zero since it should be possible to show that at least three states are needed.

State 1 - Zero dimensions – zero dimensions represents nothing or one state. This can be represented by the number zero. No amount of zeros can represent anything but one state.

Two examples

The empty set represents one state and so

{} = {}{}

In the same way as

having twice of nothing is nothing (0 = 00) and the number 11 represents one state.

State 2 One dimension – to create two states, we know we cannot choose the same as the first, we cannot choose any number less than the first as that is the smallest state. The definition must include the first in its definition (as just having 1 is the same as just having zero). It must cannot be longer than the sum of itself and the first state since it would consist of more than one nothing which is nothing. This means the unit length after zero must be the golden ratio with respect to the first state. In terms of the empty set this can be written as:

{{}}

It is also called the differential or the infinitesimal change. We have just shown that this is the only number that can come next to give to state. No matter how you choose any unit of measure that includes nothing, the golden ratio appears, in that the magnitude is simply different. But this can be seen next.

Try and add a third state. The third state must be different from the previous two.

These are the only possibilities with the empty sets

{}{{}} or {{}}{} or {{{}}}

These are all examples of trying to use 0 and 1 to describe three states including the last. The set with one element that is empty has already been defined. It is impossible to make anything a unit bigger since this can represented with 0s and 1s. Anything smaller than 2 would be smaller than 1 and we have defined everything smaller than 1 as zero.

That is the proof that all states that can exist that are not the first two possible states can be expressed in terms of those states where smallest state and the second state always have magnitude of the golden ratio.

The reasoning is simple in that by adding a second state to the first always creates the third state with no choice. If you have a length a and b has to be different by having the second state b, you create a third different state a + b. Since a and b have to be different. This creates the Fibonacci sequence if you start from 0.

0,1,1

By having two states, you create a third as well, but by having three states, the fourth different one is created which is b + (a + b) etc.

What does this mean?

It is simple, by creating anything more than nothing you create everything recursive at the same time. Binary for example by creating 1 you create 01 and 10 and 11 etc

Predicitons

Applying these to physics means that everything else can be derived from two and different dimensions by making the golden triangle constant. In nature there are the 3 of distance and one of time. If on unit of distance and one unit of time are different we can derive everything from these since a third state is created which is d/t which is c, the speed of light, etc.

The geometry of this concept is also the geometry of the E8 lie algebra and is the simplest way to fully express the asymmetry of {} and {{}}.

Someone help show what is wrong!

Can you spot the flaw in this reasoning? I’m going crazy.

This was supposed to be an extension of the Theory of Everything based on E8 that Lisi published last year but without having to know the maths of E8. This work is complete but the result is really out there. The theory has changed into a proof by induction, which I didn’t think was possible for a theory in physics. It gets even weirder, the proof implies that it is the only theory in nature that can be proved because it can describe everything and yet cannot be simplified, in that it is irreducible.

Here it is. It’s a one liner too.

“Everything can be shown to be represented by just the units 0 and 1 as long as they are different”.

Here’s the “proof”.

First try and break the hypothesis by showing that we need least three different states to describe nature by starting from zero and increasing by one state and then another to make three states. We will start from zero since it should be possible to show that at least three states are needed.

State 1 - Zero dimensions – zero dimensions represents nothing or one state. This can be represented by the number zero. No amount of zeros can represent anything but one state.

Two examples

The empty set represents one state and so

{} = {}{}

In the same way as

having twice of nothing is nothing (0 = 00) and the number 11 represents one state.

State 2 One dimension – to create two states, we know we cannot choose the same as the first, we cannot choose any number less than the first as that is the smallest state. The definition must include the first in its definition (as just having 1 is the same as just having zero). It must cannot be longer than the sum of itself and the first state since it would consist of more than one nothing which is nothing. This means the unit length after zero must be the golden ratio with respect to the first state. In terms of the empty set this can be written as:

{{}}

It is also called the differential or the infinitesimal change. We have just shown that this is the only number that can come next to give to state. No matter how you choose any unit of measure that includes nothing, the golden ratio appears, in that the magnitude is simply different. But this can be seen next.

Try and add a third state. The third state must be different from the previous two.

These are the only possibilities with the empty sets

{}{{}} or {{}}{} or {{{}}}

These are all examples of trying to use 0 and 1 to describe three states including the last. The set with one element that is empty has already been defined. It is impossible to make anything a unit bigger since this can represented with 0s and 1s. Anything smaller than 2 would be smaller than 1 and we have defined everything smaller than 1 as zero.

That is the proof that all states that can exist that are not the first two possible states can be expressed in terms of those states where smallest state and the second state always have magnitude of the golden ratio.

The reasoning is simple in that by adding a second state to the first always creates the third state with no choice. If you have a length a and b has to be different by having the second state b, you create a third different state a + b. Since a and b have to be different. This creates the Fibonacci sequence if you start from 0.

0,1,1

By having two states, you create a third as well, but by having three states, the fourth different one is created which is b + (a + b) etc.

What does this mean?

It is simple, by creating anything more than nothing you create everything recursive at the same time. Binary for example by creating 1 you create 01 and 10 and 11 etc

Predicitons

Applying these to physics means that everything else can be derived from two and different dimensions by making the golden triangle constant. In nature there are the 3 of distance and one of time. If on unit of distance and one unit of time are different we can derive everything from these since a third state is created which is d/t which is c, the speed of light, etc.

The geometry of this concept is also the geometry of the E8 lie algebra and is the simplest way to fully express the asymmetry of {} and {{}}.

Someone help show what is wrong!