Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Reality has a liberal bias!

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,364

    Reality has a liberal bias!

    I'm not sure where to post this, but I'll try here - if it's in the wrong place then could a mod please move it to where it belongs? Prof Brian Cox posted a link to this on his twitter feed - I post it here for people to mock and tear to shreds, I have no intention of supporting it

    http://conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Relativity

    The opening part reads (bold emphasis mine): "The theory of relativity is a mathematical system that allows no exceptions. It is heavily promoted by liberals who like its encouragement of relativism and its tendency to mislead people in how they view the world.[1] Here is a list of 24 counterexamples: any one of them shows that the theory is incorrect."

    If this board ever needed a "what the heck?!" smiley, it needs it now

    Leaving aside the politics, as you can imagine the examples can be torn apart pretty easily...
    General request: If I ask a question, I'd like people who know about the subject to answer it with factual answers (preferably with references). Saying we don't know is fine if that's the case. However, I'm not really interested in guesses or personal opinions. Thanks!
    Website: http://www.evildrganymede.net

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,406
    I was going to address them one by one but my brain just shot out of my nose.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
    Posts
    48,860
    EDG has also asked the moderation team if the CT forum is the appropriate spot for this.

    I would say that CT is the appropriate spot. However, the discussion must cover only the points about relatvity and will absolutely not get into anything about politics. There will be no further warnings about that point and violators will be infracted.

    I would also remind all posters of the relevent section of the advice for the CT forum

    11. The CT forum may also be used for the critical analysis of websites that advocate specific astronomy and space related conspiracies. Such discussions should be limited to the specific claims of those websites and the scientific arguments against those claims. Such discussions are not an excuse to bash the claimants of such conspiracies.
    At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

    All moderation in purple - The rules

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    N.E.Ohio
    Posts
    22,006
    I think most of that list can be covered with the following comments.
    1. Does a better formula exist to predict the results?
    2. Lack of evidence does not disprove a concept.
    3. How many of the differences take in account the accuracy of the instruments?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,201
    relativity ... relativism
    Isn't somebody getting things that sound similar yet are totally different terribly mixed up?

    What on Earth does a principle of cold, impersonal nature have to do with an ethical/moralistic/philosophical/political view of the world?

    Sure, as an example, the Pope is against relativism, but I've never heard him say that the Theory of Relativity was immoral or against creation.

    It's amazing how certain issues can get caught up in the backwater of other issues for absurd reasons, only to become innocent parts of otherwise purly ideologic battles.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Great NorthWet
    Posts
    14,277
    It's going to be next to impossible to discuss anything on Conservapaedia without violating the politics rule due to the inherent political nature of that site. Suffice it to say that they espouse an extreme fundamentalist, far-right, creationist point of view and that dissent is not tolerated.
    Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    4,138
    It seems a peculiar misunderstanding of the difference between relativity and relativism. And I'm pretty sure the scientists who have tested and validated relativity over the years stretched across the political spectrum from left to right in their political views. The physical universe has no political views.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
    Posts
    48,860
    Quote Originally Posted by Trebuchet View Post
    It's going to be next to impossible to discuss anything on Conservapaedia without violating the politics rule due to the inherent political nature of that site. Suffice it to say that they espouse an extreme fundamentalist, far-right, creationist point of view and that dissent is not tolerated.
    So far, so good, but this thread is on a very short lead. If everyone sticks to physics, it will be fine.
    At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

    All moderation in purple - The rules

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    a long way away
    Posts
    10,632
    They assert that relativity "allows no exceptions" (implying it is believed to be absloutely correct) but in their list are a few areas that are known to be problems in mainstream physics (e.g. a quantum theory of gravity).

    I was curious about a few of the points:

    3. Increasingly precise measurements of the advance of the perihelion of Mercury show a shift greater than predicted by relativity, well beyond the margin of error

    17. # Data from the PSR B1913+16 increasingly diverge from predictions of the General Theory of Relativity such that, despite a Nobel Prize in Physics being awarded for early work on this pulsar, no data at all have been released about it for over five years.
    Is there any basis of truth in either of those?

    I love the way that one of the contributors on the Talk page repeatedly says "I have an open mind about this ... [but no]". But there are also very nice explanations of some of their errors by someone called Simeon. (Which, of course, get ignored.)

Similar Threads

  1. observational bias
    By toothdust in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 2008-Jul-18, 10:29 PM
  2. The artful bias of the BBC
    By Glom in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 2006-Feb-07, 11:08 AM
  3. gravity is a liberal activist idea..
    By novaderrik in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 2005-Jul-07, 09:03 PM
  4. Questions from a Liberal Arts major.
    By Yossarian in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 2005-Jul-05, 05:41 PM
  5. Astronomy with a liberal arts degree
    By ToSeek in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 2005-Feb-14, 06:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •