Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 58 of 58

Thread: Why Is It That...

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    The Valley of the Sun
    Posts
    9,536
    Why Is It That... Coopers make barrels instead of chicken coops?

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    The Valley of the Sun
    Posts
    9,536
    Why Is It That... Lord Voldemort didn't just hire a muggle hitman to shoot down young Harry Potter in the street.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    The Valley of the Sun
    Posts
    9,536
    Why Is It That... In American football, tackle is an offensive position even though most tackling is done by the defense?

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    The Valley of the Sun
    Posts
    9,536
    Why is it That... Superman doesn't get a gun? He swore never to use his super powers to kill, but if he had a gun then his next encounter with Lex Luthor would be his last.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    The Valley of the Sun
    Posts
    9,536
    Why is it That... States are divided into counties when we have no counts to run them?

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Norfolk UK and some of me is in Northern France
    Posts
    8,718
    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck View Post
    Why is it That... States are divided into counties when we have no counts to run them?
    Is it because we are all countees? I never thought about that before but i do get counted from time to time, but does that count? Does a count count? I shall worry about that all day until something more pressing comes along. You can count on that.
    sicut vis videre esto
    When we realize that patterns don't exist in the universe, they are a template that we hold to the universe to make sense of it, it all makes a lot more sense.
    Originally Posted by Ken G

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    The Valley of the Sun
    Posts
    9,536
    Why is it That... When the motor of a vehicle is applying the drive that moves it, the person just steering it is called the driver?

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    The Valley of the Sun
    Posts
    9,536
    Why is it That... I never see some metric system prefixes being used? Decimeter, Decameter, and Hectometer seem to be ignored. A 4 Decameter tall building is always described as being 40 meters tall.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Sioux Falls, SD
    Posts
    8,821
    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck View Post
    Why is it That... I never see some metric system prefixes being used? Decimeter, Decameter, and Hectometer seem to be ignored. A 4 Decameter tall building is always described as being 40 meters tall.
    Well, "40 meters" is shorter than "4 decameters", whether you're writing it or saying it out loud.

    Plus, relatively few people know what the prefixes "deci", "deca", and "hecto" mean, which makes their non-usage somewhat self-reinforcing.
    Sometimes you win, sometimes you learn

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    15,544
    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck View Post
    Why is it That... I never see some metric system prefixes being used? Decimeter, Decameter, and Hectometer seem to be ignored. A 4 Decameter tall building is always described as being 40 meters tall.
    Depends on the context. Some are used regularly, others rarely. For example, automotive torques are/were often stated in daNm instead of Nm. Which would be fine by me, if there weren't also quite some low values and then you get a rather ridiculous "0.9 daNm" which simply is 9 Nm.

    Hectoliter is used a lot for big quantities of beer or wine.

    For distances, a lot of use is made of kilo, centi, milli, micro. And for some SI area units, hecto is used: hectare = 100 are. Careful: an are is not the same as an acre.

    Deci is used a lot in cooking: deciliter.

    Other prefixes are indeed rarely used. Mathematically correct as they may be, people also like to use a measurement which they have a feeling for. And then you get a snowball effect: if "decameter" is rarely used, people don't have a feel for it and so it will get used even less.
    Last edited by Nicolas; 2019-Mar-15 at 07:45 PM.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    954
    Why do both 'flammable' and 'inflammable' mean the same thing?

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Nowhere (middle)
    Posts
    37,105
    Why do some people say "irregardless" REGARDLESS of the correct usage?
    "I'm planning to live forever. So far, that's working perfectly." Steven Wright

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    The Valley of the Sun
    Posts
    9,536
    Why is it acceptable to say "Sally only has ten cents" when what is meant is ”Sally has only ten cents"?

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Norfolk UK and some of me is in Northern France
    Posts
    8,718
    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck View Post
    Why is it acceptable to say "Sally only has ten cents" when what is meant is ”Sally has only ten cents"?
    or is it meant that Sally has ten cents only? I guess "Sally has ten cents" is less judgemental and is only preferred in particular only socially prejudiced situations.?
    "
    sicut vis videre esto
    When we realize that patterns don't exist in the universe, they are a template that we hold to the universe to make sense of it, it all makes a lot more sense.
    Originally Posted by Ken G

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    The Valley of the Sun
    Posts
    9,536
    Why is it that no matter how much damage a Star Trek universe starship takes, its antimatter containment field never fails?

  16. #46
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Nowhere (middle)
    Posts
    37,105
    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck View Post
    Why is it that no matter how much damage a Star Trek universe starship takes, its antimatter containment field never fails?
    It makes engineering sense that the most dangerous part of the engine is the most heavily and redundantly shielded.
    "I'm planning to live forever. So far, that's working perfectly." Steven Wright

  17. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    The Valley of the Sun
    Posts
    9,536
    Quote Originally Posted by Noclevername View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck
    Why is it that no matter how much damage a Star Trek universe starship takes, its antimatter containment field never fails?
    It makes engineering sense that the most dangerous part of the engine is the most heavily and redundantly shielded.
    Yes, but even if another starship is dead in space, the containment field never fails. No one is even concerned about it. They should use that technology for their defensive shields.

  18. #48
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Nowhere (middle)
    Posts
    37,105
    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck View Post
    Yes, but even if another starship is dead in space, the containment field never fails. No one is even concerned about it. They should use that technology for their defensive shields.
    It's established canon that if a warp core is compromised, it gets ejected.
    "I'm planning to live forever. So far, that's working perfectly." Steven Wright

  19. #49
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    The Valley of the Sun
    Posts
    9,536
    Quote Originally Posted by Noclevername View Post
    Originally Posted by Chuck
    Yes, but even if another starship is dead in space, the containment field never fails. No one is even concerned about it. They should use that technology for their defensive shields.
    It's established canon that if a warp core is compromised, it gets ejected.
    That makes sense, but they never seem to think that the warp core is compromised no matter what they're being attacked by.

  20. #50
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Falls Church, VA (near Washington, DC)
    Posts
    8,789
    Quote Originally Posted by brianok View Post
    Why do both 'flammable' and 'inflammable' mean the same thing?
    I think "flammable" has become the preferred form because "inflammable" can be misconstrued as fireproof. There are words in which a prefix "in" or im" means "not", as in incapable or impossible. "Inflammable" literally means "can be inflamed". I can remember seeing the word "noninflammable", but I think "nonflammable" is preferred now. These are just more reasons that our mongrel English language is difficult for many foreigners to learn.

  21. #51
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    The Valley of the Sun
    Posts
    9,536
    Why is it that...the diseased vermin are the good guys in Mighty Mouse cartoons?

  22. #52
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Nowhere (middle)
    Posts
    37,105
    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck View Post
    Why is it that...the diseased vermin are the good guys in Mighty Mouse cartoons?
    Mickey envy.
    "I'm planning to live forever. So far, that's working perfectly." Steven Wright

  23. #53
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Nowhere (middle)
    Posts
    37,105
    Why do they call it Rush Hour when nobody can move?
    "I'm planning to live forever. So far, that's working perfectly." Steven Wright

  24. #54
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    11,594
    That's the band they listen to when actually parked on the parkway.

  25. #55
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    1
    Why do so many people try to argue against factual evidence, and or, a scientifically proven fact? :/

  26. #56
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    The Valley of the Sun
    Posts
    9,536
    Why couldn't the founders of The United States come up with a more interesting name for their country?

  27. #57
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Nowhere (middle)
    Posts
    37,105
    Quote Originally Posted by Anxiety View Post
    Why do so many people try to argue against factual evidence, and or, a scientifically proven fact? :/
    Dunning/Kruger syndrome
    "I'm planning to live forever. So far, that's working perfectly." Steven Wright

  28. #58
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    The Valley of the Sun
    Posts
    9,536
    Why is it that... The War of 1812 didn't get a more descriptive name like all the other wars?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •