Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 8910
Results 271 to 283 of 283

Thread: China is making headway with cooperation with other countries excluding US.

  1. #271
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Klang, Malaysia
    Posts
    9,074
    "Experts: NASA will continue working with Russia on space despite China plan"

    https://www.upi.com/Science_News/202...4071618254140/

    Russia and NASA will continue to cooperate in space in the near future, even as Russia moves to work with China on lunar exploration, experts said.

    Russia and China announced March 9 they will cooperate on China's planned International Scientific Lunar Station, while the United States will have no involvement in the Chinese space program under a law passed in 2011.
    I am because we are
    (African saying)

  2. #272
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    4,489
    Here's an article marking the 60th anniversary of Gagarin's flight and pointing out the poor state of the current program, as well as pointing out an obvious reason why they are so keen to work with China:

    Six decades after Gagarin, nostalgia—and not much else—fuels Russia in space

    Because NASA now has access to Crew Dragon, it can stop purchasing Soyuz seats for American and other international astronauts on Soyuz, which cost more than $90 million apiece. These purchases accounted for about one-fifth of Russia's annual space budget of $2.4 billion.
    And that doesn't account for the loss of potential commercial business to SpaceX, Rocket Lab, etc.

  3. #273
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Klang, Malaysia
    Posts
    9,074
    Now an article in The Times, calling for China and the USA to join forces in space - "Why the U.S. and China Should Collaborate in Space"

    The article is written by Will Marshall (CEO of Planet) and Colonel Chris Hadfield (who was Commander of the International Space Station and flew both the U.S. Space Shuttle and Russian Soyuz vehicles).

    https://time.com/5954941/u-s-china-s...rate-in-space/

    While much has been made of the tense March 18 exchange between American and Chinese diplomats in Anchorage, Alaska, one area became an unlikely candidate for cooperation: outer space. During a press conference after the meeting, Jake Sullivan, the U.S. National Security Advisor, pointed out that the Perseverance rover that recently landed on Mars “wasn’t just an American project. It had technology from multiple countries from Europe and other parts of the world.” China’s top diplomat, Yang Jiechi, seized the opportunity to say that, “China would welcome it if there is a will to carry out similar cooperation from the United States with us.”

    Planned or not, Yang’s comment gave voice to one very smart way two geopolitical rivals sharing the same planet could work together despite their growing tensions. Space exploration has long been used to foster deep cooperation, even between adversaries. During the height of the Cold War, the U.S. and U.S.S.R. jointly undertook the 1975 Apollo-Soyuz mission, which both served as a means of political rapprochement and opened the possibility of cooperation in other areas. Those links endured. After the Soviet Union collapsed, Russia was invited to partner in the construction of the International Space Station (ISS). It was a multi-layered act that went beyond simple generosity; the more work former Soviet scientists had to do designing and building the ISS, the less likely they’d be to sell their expertise to other countries.
    I am because we are
    (African saying)

  4. #274
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    409
    Quote Originally Posted by selvaarchi View Post
    Now an article in The Times, calling for China and the USA to join forces in space - "Why the U.S. and China Should Collaborate in Space"

    The article is written by Will Marshall (CEO of Planet) and Colonel Chris Hadfield (who was Commander of the International Space Station and flew both the U.S. Space Shuttle and Russian Soyuz vehicles).

    https://time.com/5954941/u-s-china-s...rate-in-space/
    This is from Time (Magazine), not The Times, which could refer to any number of worldwide newspapers.

    USA-China cooperation in space? Duh. It is disappointing that China's progress has been rather slow, and I suppose this is partly due to USA forbidding space cooperation. Otherwise, with more countries and commercial companies involved in space R&D, it will become more difficult to shut them out. I guess it will still be 5-10 years before NASA finally starts working with China. Otherwise their own intransigence will lock them out of a growing worldwide space industry.

  5. #275
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    4,489
    Quote Originally Posted by 7cscb View Post
    This is from Time (Magazine), not The Times, which could refer to any number of worldwide newspapers.

    USA-China cooperation in space? Duh. It is disappointing that China's progress has been rather slow, and I suppose this is partly due to USA forbidding space cooperation. Otherwise, with more countries and commercial companies involved in space R&D, it will become more difficult to shut them out. I guess it will still be 5-10 years before NASA finally starts working with China. Otherwise their own intransigence will lock them out of a growing worldwide space industry.
    That makes little sense since the major players in commercial spaceflight are largely based in the USA.

  6. #276
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    409
    Quote Originally Posted by Garrison View Post
    That makes little sense since the major players in commercial spaceflight are largely based in the USA.
    My point is that the huge American technological dominance in space will be eroded by the growing R&D efforts of others. The USA will likely want to participate and compete in a growing international space industry, actually selling/licensing their know-how. It's normal. It has happened in most key industries.

  7. #277
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    20,017
    Quote Originally Posted by 7cscb View Post
    My point is that the huge American technological dominance in space will be eroded by the growing R&D efforts of others. The USA will likely want to participate and compete in a growing international space industry, actually selling/licensing their know-how. It's normal. It has happened in most key industries.
    Maybe, maybe not. I think we are seeing the beginning of a new technological and industrial revolution in space development. And right now the US appears to be at the front of it. Historically, space technology companies have been very reluctant to try new things when they have something that works. To a large extent, that is because it all costs so much, but if SpaceX can drive other launch providers out of business with their lower costs, others will be forced to compete or die. And as it gets cheaper to launch satellites, etc., companies and governments won’t be so reluctant to try new things in space.

    In the US, there have also been all the cost plus aerospace contracts, which don’t exactly encourage fast moving innovation and competition. I think we’re seeing that change too.

    "The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is hard to verify their authenticity." — Abraham Lincoln

    I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

    The Leif Ericson Cruiser

  8. #278
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    4,489
    Quote Originally Posted by Van Rijn View Post
    Maybe, maybe not. I think we are seeing the beginning of a new technological and industrial revolution in space development. And right now the US appears to be at the front of it. Historically, space technology companies have been very reluctant to try new things when they have something that works. To a large extent, that is because it all costs so much, but if SpaceX can drive other launch providers out of business with their lower costs, others will be forced to compete or die. And as it gets cheaper to launch satellites, etc., companies and governments won’t be so reluctant to try new things in space.

    In the US, there have also been all the cost plus aerospace contracts, which don’t exactly encourage fast moving innovation and competition. I think we’re seeing that change too.
    I think that's an important point. 10-15 years when it was China's centrally controlled space program versus the cosy club of NASA, congress, and corporate lobbyists and China definitely seemed to be closing the gap in terms of capability. Now in the face of the new commercial companies the gap i opening again. Sure there are 'private' companies in China but given the intrusive nature of China's government entrepreneurship only goes so far.

  9. #279
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Klang, Malaysia
    Posts
    9,074
    "Analysts: China’s space programs are a security concern to the U.S. but not all are nefarious"

    https://spacenews.com/analysts-china...are-nefarious/

    The U.S. intelligence community in a report listed China’s space program as a top security concern for the United States. Some space experts and analysts criticized the report for painting China’s space program with a broad brush and failing to draw distinctions between civilian and military space pursuits.

    Todd Harrison, director of the Aerospace Security Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the report “conflates space capabilities in general with space capabilities that are potential threats.”

    The U.S. intelligence community’s annual threat assessment published April 13, for example, mentions Chinese civilian space programs such as a future space station and a network of navigation satellites as capabilities that China is pursuing that could be a threat to the United States.

    “The U.S. government needs to be clear about which Chinese space developments pose a threat and are a security concern — and there are many — and which developments merely show that China is pursing an ambitious civil space program to catch up to where the United States was 20 or 30 years ago,” Harrison told SpaceNews.

    China’s space station, Harrison believes, is a positive development. “It gives them a good reason not to trash low Earth orbit with a bunch of space junk.”

    Victoria Samson, Washington Office director at the Secure World Foundation, questioned why the intelligence community listed China’s space station as a threat even though it’s been planned for more than a decade. “I didn’t know that a space station was a sign of nefarious intent for space,” Samson tweeted April 15.

    John Klein, adjunct professor at George Washington University’s Space Policy Institute, said it’s a constant debate whether intelligence agencies overstate or exaggerate the potential threat posed by China.
    I am because we are
    (African saying)

  10. #280
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    4,489
    Quote Originally Posted by selvaarchi View Post
    "Analysts: China’s space programs are a security concern to the U.S. but not all are nefarious"

    https://spacenews.com/analysts-china...are-nefarious/
    'But not all' is hardly reassuring. Like 'Look I only mug some of the people I meet'.

  11. #281
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Klang, Malaysia
    Posts
    9,074
    Quote Originally Posted by Garrison View Post
    'But not all' is hardly reassuring. Like 'Look I only mug some of the people I meet'.
    As the post 'Launch window" posted in the tread "U.S. to cease funding for Arecibo radio telescope" shows the USA will have to compromise in some areas.
    I am because we are
    (African saying)

  12. #282
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    4,489
    Quote Originally Posted by selvaarchi View Post
    As the post 'Launch window" posted in the tread "U.S. to cease funding for Arecibo radio telescope" shows the USA will have to compromise in some areas.
    Not sure how that addresses the 'not all are nefarious' issue.

  13. #283
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Klang, Malaysia
    Posts
    9,074
    Quote Originally Posted by Garrison View Post
    Not sure how that addresses the 'not all are nefarious' issue.
    won't go there other wise trouble
    I am because we are
    (African saying)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •