# Thread: Would you see billions of years happening in seconds behind you going in a black hole

1. ## Would you see billions of years happening in seconds behind you going in a black hole

Since the stronger the gravity gets the closer you get to a black hole as you get really close or start to pass the event horizon if you were looking behind you or going in backwards would you see stars going supernova and being born in seconds as you went in?

How much time would you see passing by away from the black hole as you went through the event horizon? Thousands, millions, billions, trillions of years in seconds?

My guess is that once you pass the event horizon since this is the region where space is falling faster than light you'll no longer be able to see anything behind you and time doesn't exist anyway as Michio Kaku explains in this video: Fast forward to 4:15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2mjoI7bgXM

2. Banned
Join Date
Dec 2004
Posts
14,782
I addressed pretty much all of those questions less than a

http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthre...-from-the-edge

Although I didn't give any quantitative answers.

An observer free-falling into a black hole would see everything
happening outside the black hole apparently slowed down and
squished into a small circle directly overhead. Light from
outside would be redshifted. The observer would reach the
center of a supermassive black hole in a few minutes or hours
of his own proper time, depending on the size of the black hole.
The observer would be spaghettified before reaching the center.

An observer hovering on a fantastically powerful rocket just
above the event horizon would also see everything outside
squished into a circle overhead, but light from outside would
be blueshifted, and everything would appear speeded up.
How much time the observer would see pass in the outside
Universe depends on how long the rocket can support him.
If the rocket is close enough to the event horizon to speed
up the apparent passage of time in the outside Universe
significantly, then the rate of fuel useage would be vastly
greater than it would be for the same rocket supporting the
same mass near Earth's surface, for example.

Instead of hovering on a rocket, the observer could sit on a
platform built around the black hole. The time dilation would
be exactly the same as it would be for the hovering rocket at
the same distance from the black hole. If the platform were
built so that the acceleration of gravity on the platform is 1 g,
the same as it is at Earth's surface, then the observer would
see time in the outside Universe speeded up by exactly the
same amount we see it speeded up because we are sitting on
Earth's surface. A very, very tiny amount. But measureable
and important in a few things such as GPS. If the platform
were built close enough to the black hole to give an obvious
time dilation, the material it was built from would have to be
magic. No real material could support the weight.

-- Jeff, in Minneapolis

3. Banned
Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
27,229
Originally Posted by Jeff Root
If the platform were
built so that the acceleration of gravity on the platform is 1 g,
the same as it is at Earth's surface, then the observer would
see time in the outside Universe speeded up by exactly the
same amount we see it speeded up because we are sitting on
Earth's surface.
Actually, the time dilation depends on the gravitational potential, not the gravitational acceleration. To go from the first to the second, multiply by a characteristic length, which is much smaller for a stellar-mass black hole, and much larger for a supermassive black hole. This means the effect (hypothetically) would be much more apparent when the acceleration is 1 g around a supermassive black hole.

4. Banned
Join Date
Dec 2004
Posts
14,782
Yes. That was careless of me. If the platform were built so
that the gravitational potential on the platform is the same as
it is at Earth's surface, then the observer would see time in the
outside Universe speeded up by exactly the same amount we
see it speeded up because we are sitting on Earth's surface.

-- Jeff, in Minneapolis

5. Banned
Join Date
Dec 2004
Posts
14,782
If Earth were compressed to a black hole, the event horizon
would be about a centimeter in diameter. (Between the size
of a large pea and a small marble.) If a platform were then
built around this mini black hole with the same diameter as
the uncompressed Earth, both the gravitational acceleration
and the gravitational potential on the platform would be the
same as on the surface of the uncompressed Earth.

I think that such a platform could theoretically hold up under
its own weight if built of real materials. Theoretically...

-- Jeff, in Minneapolis

6. Banned
Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
27,229
It might be tough to make an arch that could support against 1 g with no support over such huge distances. Judging from things like bridges, we seem to have trouble supporting large structures against 1 g unless we can support them every few hundred meters. A single arch with a huge radius of curvature might be a considerable challenge.

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•