Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Milky Way type and twin

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,866

    Milky Way type and twin

    Can someone give me a galaxy which has the same classification as the MW, with all the subtypes, is about the same size and is clearly visible with arms, bar, etc...just as the MW would look from another galaxy?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts, USA
    Posts
    21,865
    Looking for cover art? Hopefully someone can help you out.
    Forming opinions as we speak

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    6,058
    Seeing as we dont know what the Milky Way looks like from the outside, that would be hard.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,474
    According to this recent article, quote,

    We note that NGC 3521 is a near twin to the Milky Way, having a similar luminosity, scale length, and rotation curve.


    The Surface Density Profile of the Galactic Disk from the Terminal Velocity Curve

    http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.06387

    Although to what degree it actually "looks the same" I'm not sure...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    12,835
    There is a difference in appearance given that the MW is a barred spiral.
    We know time flies, we just can't see its wings.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    3,162
    NGC 1232 is also mentioned often in this context - small bar, open multi-armed spiral.

    In de Vaucouleurs' system, our classification has been given as SAB(rs)bc (funny how many of those are transitional).

    NED has the ability to search published classfications in detail - if I got the pointers right, this query gets a list of the 143 spirals listed as sharing this classification.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,474
    Here's an interesting and recent paper by Giovanni Carraro

    The Milky Way disk

    Quote:
    Clearly there are no general consensus, and
    much work still needs to be done. This is particularly
    relevant for the spiral structure of the Milky Way,
    which is often deemed to be understood. However, even
    the Orion arm, where the Sun is located in, nature is
    controversial.


    http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.03151

    This is another interesting paper, albeit from 2010:

    On the Spiral Structure of the Milky Way Galaxy

    Quote: our Galaxy resembles stronger the galaxies like NGC 3124, NGC 3992 or NGC 2336

    There are pictures of these galaxies towards the end of the paper.

    http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1011/1011.4576.pdf

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    12,835
    Are there any illustrations of the MW that include the dwarf galaxies colliding with us relative to our location?
    We know time flies, we just can't see its wings.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,474
    Quote Originally Posted by George View Post
    Are there any illustrations of the MW that include the dwarf galaxies colliding with us relative to our location?
    I thought it's been established that the dwarf galaxy collisions are illusions?
    There was that press release a few months back about the rippling, warping and flaring of the outer disk which gave a false impression of colliding galaxies.

    Here's another Giovanni Carraro paper, see particularly figures 7 and 8 which purport to show how this came about.

    The Milky Way thin disk structure as revealed by stars and young open clusters

    Quote:
    <<...models of Galactic structure need to be revised
    by removing this artificial cut-off and properly model the Galactic warp and flare. This will
    help prevent observations’ mis-interpretations, like the one of the Canis Major galaxy and the
    Monoceros ring...>>

    http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.0569

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •