Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Life discovered on Mars?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    310

    Life discovered on Mars?

    https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/scie...155500053.html


    Didn’t see an article from Universe Today. Is this legit?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,688
    A quick search found several links concluding that the individuals purporting life on Mars deals with shoddy schience. So bogus is the bet.
    Here is one of the links. https://www.popularmechanics.com/spa...-life-on-mars/

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    NEOTP Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    3,509

    Life discovered on Mars?

    Quote Originally Posted by bknight View Post
    A quick search found several links concluding that the individuals purporting life on Mars deals with shoddy schience. So bogus is the bet.
    Here is one of the links. https://www.popularmechanics.com/spa...-life-on-mars/
    Paywall. Or enough like one.

    ETA: better link

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.pop...-life-on-mars/

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    19,977
    Quote Originally Posted by SRH View Post
    https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/scie...155500053.html


    Didn’t see an article from Universe Today. Is this legit?

    Bunk.

    Rhawn Joseph is listed as lead author. Rhawn has a long history of pushing pseudoscience. If you do a Google search on this site you’ll see his name come up at times in prior stories. He was involved in the infamous Journal of Cosmology which billed itself as a serious scientific journal but let junk be published. It was initially taken seriously by some news organizations but after they got burned, that changed pretty quickly.

    Anyway, Rhawn has notions about a very odd variation on panspermia, thinks evolutionary theory is wrong (he isn’t a creationist but has a different notion), insists the universe must be eternal (no Big Bang) and takes about anything as evidence for his notions.

    Here, he is looking at pictures and saying “It looks like life to me” with no real evidence.

    "The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is hard to verify their authenticity." — Abraham Lincoln

    I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

    The Leif Ericson Cruiser

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    19,977
    Quote Originally Posted by schlaugh View Post
    Paywall. Or enough like one.

    ETA: better link

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.pop...-life-on-mars/
    Still paywalled for me. I think I looked at Popular Mechanics a month or two ago, so I think it works if you haven’t looked at the site.

    This article seems pretty good though, the author says much the same as I do on Rhawn Joseph and makes some other good points:

    https://www.cnet.com/news/no-nasa-ph...on-mars-sorry/

    The author points to an earlier article they wrote that gives you an idea of what Rhawn is like:

    https://retractionwatch.com/2020/10/...ringer-nature/

    The new article also touches on one of the issues I was thinking about: The surface of Mars is a terrible place for mushrooms. It’s usually very cold, so regular fungi would freeze, dry out, or both. They would be killed by the UV, there is almost no atmosphere and what exactly would they live on? Sure, you could speculate about some kind of life that might be able to survive on Mars, but it would have to be very different from Earth life. This is just something that he thought looked like mushrooms, so that’s what’s claimed.

    "The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is hard to verify their authenticity." — Abraham Lincoln

    I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

    The Leif Ericson Cruiser

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    20,563
    The article is published in Advances In Microbiology, a journal produced by Scientific Research Publishing, which is on Beall's List of potential predatory publishers.

    Predatory publishers offer peer-reviewed open-access publication, but in fact accept any old nonsense and then charge the authors a fee "to cover costs". View anything published in a Beall's List journal with extreme caution. Particularly when the published article is on a topic that is not within the journal's declared sphere of interest. Mushrooms are not microbiology, and a creditable microbiology journal would have returned the manuscript with a polite rejection without even sending it out for review.

    Grant Hutchison
    Last edited by grant hutchison; Yesterday at 10:21 PM.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Van Rijn View Post
    Bunk.

    Rhawn Joseph is listed as lead author. Rhawn has a long history of pushing pseudoscience. If you do a Google search on this site you’ll see his name come up at times in prior stories. He was involved in the infamous Journal of Cosmology which billed itself as a serious scientific journal but let junk be published. It was initially taken seriously by some news organizations but after they got burned, that changed pretty quickly.

    Anyway, Rhawn has notions about a very odd variation on panspermia, thinks evolutionary theory is wrong (he isn’t a creationist but has a different notion), insists the universe must be eternal (no Big Bang) and takes about anything as evidence for his notions.

    Here, he is looking at pictures and saying “It looks like life to me” with no real evidence.
    Found basically the same thing, got me excited for a minute that I had to put aside something I was working on and write about this.
    From the wilderness into the cosmos.
    You can not be afraid of the wind, Enterprise: Broken Bow.
    https://davidsuniverse.wordpress.com/

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    19,977
    Quote Originally Posted by grant hutchison View Post
    The article is published in Advances In Microbiology, a journal produced by Scientific Research Publishing, which is on Beall's List of potential predatory publishers.
    The Cnet article mentions that. It also mentions that they were caught republishing articles. They claimed it was a mistake. The Cnet article linked to this Nature article with details about it:

    https://www.nature.com/news/2010/100...l/463148a.html

    The Cnet article also mentions that the author looked into the people shown on the editorial board, and one wrote back that he hadn’t been on it for 5-6 years, but is still listed there.

    I think it is safe to say Advances in Microbiology definitely isn’t trustworthy.

    "The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is hard to verify their authenticity." — Abraham Lincoln

    I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

    The Leif Ericson Cruiser

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    19,977
    I’m a bit annoyed, I did a Google site search and didn’t find some of the posts I expected on Rhawn Joseph. Many years ago I wrote a fairly long post on some of the things I found on him. Really “out there” claims, shady interactions with other people, how the Journal of Cosmology had the same look and feel of his personal website but he tried to look independent, how an editor on Journal of Cosmology would go around the internet to yell at people that criticized him. She did that here and a number of other sites. Also, David Brin was asked to review one of his articles for JoC and got a nasty response from her for pointing out its faults. You can read about that here:

    http://www.sentientdevelopments.com/...gins-that.html

    It also has his comments on the article. Joseph has also written about cosmology, and my impression from his articles is that he is deeply ignorant of the subject matter. The articles tend to be of the same limited quality I often see in our ATM section. He doesn’t subtly fail, the errors are at a level anyone with general knowledge on the subject would notice.

    I’ve heard he was also known for “out there” videos on YouTube, but I haven’t seen them. Anyway, there is just a lot of odd stuff about him.

    "The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is hard to verify their authenticity." — Abraham Lincoln

    I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

    The Leif Ericson Cruiser

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Great NorthWet
    Posts
    16,842
    Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    2,074
    https://www.researchgate.net/publica...uential_Images
    Just found this. After scimming through it, lots of pictures of stuff that looks like life. Extra ordinary claims, no extra ordinary evidence.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    NEOTP Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    3,509
    Seems like a rehash of the “martian trees” nonsense from 10 years ago.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.spa...-illusion.html

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Norfolk UK and some of me is in Northern France
    Posts
    9,744
    Quote Originally Posted by schlaugh View Post
    Seems like a rehash of the “martian trees” nonsense from 10 years ago.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.spa...-illusion.html
    Well most fungi are saprophytic so they would need dead trees to feed upon, or animals. So it’s a shame, we nearly found a dead murdered martian to really get excited about. That would be newsworthy.
    sicut vis videre esto
    When we realize that patterns don't exist in the universe, they are a template that we hold to the universe to make sense of it, it all makes a lot more sense.
    Originally Posted by Ken G

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    19,977
    Quote Originally Posted by schlaugh View Post
    Seems like a rehash of the “martian trees” nonsense from 10 years ago.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.spa...-illusion.html
    In part, it is. Those are most of the rapidly changing surface features being discussed. And the “blueberries” (hematite spherules) account for most of “mushroom” claims. There is actually a section where standard interpretations are discussed, Phil Plait is even mentioned (he apparently discussed pareidolia but the article claims standard interpretations are based on pareidolia, never mind there is much more to it than that). These aren’t new claims and they aren’t based on new data.

    "The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is hard to verify their authenticity." — Abraham Lincoln

    I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

    The Leif Ericson Cruiser

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Depew, NY
    Posts
    12,479
    I don't know nothing, but these images looked like ice to me. That is a kind of wild speculation in itself, but the last time I checked, ice isn't alive.
    Last edited by Solfe; Today at 02:45 PM.
    Solfe

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Norfolk UK and some of me is in Northern France
    Posts
    9,744
    Quote Originally Posted by Solfe View Post
    I don't know nothing, but these images looked like ice to me. That a kind of wild speculation in itself, but the last time I checked, ice isn't alive.
    And sublimation of ice as the sun rises seems quite plausible. Even dead ice.
    sicut vis videre esto
    When we realize that patterns don't exist in the universe, they are a template that we hold to the universe to make sense of it, it all makes a lot more sense.
    Originally Posted by Ken G

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •