I wasn't sure, but I strongly suspected. It seemed more like the closing scene in the film Lawnmower Man than anything based in actual computer architecture.
"I'm planning to live forever. So far, that's working perfectly." Steven Wright
The moment an instant lasted forever, we were destined for the leading edge of eternity.
I guess it all depends on how their makers socialize them before releasing them into the "wild". Certainly we do not want them learning from the Internet before they have developed strong personalities! We've seen where that leads.
"I'm planning to live forever. So far, that's working perfectly." Steven Wright
Statistically, yes. There are a lot of troll bots.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intern...Malicious_bots
Bots may be used on internet forums to automatically post inflammatory or nonsensical posts to disrupt the forum and anger users.
"I'm planning to live forever. So far, that's working perfectly." Steven Wright
Going back to this, the bandwidth limitations alone make it seem unlikely that multiple AI would form a "hive mind".
What if they do form a cooperation? As learning machines, they could by definition adapt to each other's presence.
Or, There Can Be Only One: an AI that could perceive others of its kind as a threat might stymie any human attempts to build others.
Or or, there might be a surviving winner of the AI conflicts; an entity that has just taught itself by experience to be ruthless and wipe out potential threats...![]()
"I'm planning to live forever. So far, that's working perfectly." Steven Wright
How do you program in all the instincts that species have for cooperation and all the checks and balances that would be needed. I would think it would be just as hard to do this as it would be to actually make a new species of animal from scratch. Much less an intelligent species.
The moment an instant lasted forever, we were destined for the leading edge of eternity.
Yes, it probably would be just as immensely difficult as creating a conscious being at all.
Don't think of AI as a "species". That's a biological term. They might be digital copies of each other or they might each be a one-off, built according to totally different design architectures.
ADDED: This has become a conversation about Conscious AI itself, rather than the patent aspect. I'll drop this line of discussion and try to stick to the OP topic.
"I'm planning to live forever. So far, that's working perfectly." Steven Wright
If corporations can someday own patents, perhaps a conscious being may simply establish a corporate front and register its patents through that.
Last edited by Noclevername; 2020-Aug-30 at 08:07 PM.
"I'm planning to live forever. So far, that's working perfectly." Steven Wright
A corporation can own a patent but not be the inventor. The deal is to protect the inventor but that also protects the owner. That’s why the deal is important in society. The almost opposite is publication without a patent, (that prevents a patent deal) and maybe AI would be altruistic in that way. Being barred from invention, AI just publishes! That could make human invention hard to protect, so investment in new ideas becomes unprofitable. A new angle on the question of innovation.
sicut vis videre esto
When we realize that patterns don't exist in the universe, they are a template that we hold to the universe to make sense of it, it all makes a lot more sense.
Originally Posted by Ken G
I misunderstood the OP as saying corporations could not legally hold patents. My bad.
"I'm planning to live forever. So far, that's working perfectly." Steven Wright
As I see it, if a corporate entity can own a patent, nothing prevents an AGI from doing so by incorporating.
"I'm planning to live forever. So far, that's working perfectly." Steven Wright
I could get rich by inventing artificial intelligences and selling their own patents to them.
sicut vis videre esto
When we realize that patterns don't exist in the universe, they are a template that we hold to the universe to make sense of it, it all makes a lot more sense.
Originally Posted by Ken G
"I'm planning to live forever. So far, that's working perfectly." Steven Wright
Agi ?
sicut vis videre esto
When we realize that patterns don't exist in the universe, they are a template that we hold to the universe to make sense of it, it all makes a lot more sense.
Originally Posted by Ken G
Thanks that’s new to me. Watch out for ASAI, artificial self aware intelligence. The next step. Not that an AI would have to be self aware to invent something, but it would have to model alternative futures in order to imagine a change. I suppose tool use is a test of that. Leading to inventing a new tool. Humans took thousands of years to add handles to flint hand axes, tens of thousands actually, And no patent! I can imagine a financial program inventing a new derivative by trial and error plus feedback. Not a nice thought unfortunately. But at least it would not be able to patent it!
sicut vis videre esto
When we realize that patterns don't exist in the universe, they are a template that we hold to the universe to make sense of it, it all makes a lot more sense.
Originally Posted by Ken G
"I'm planning to live forever. So far, that's working perfectly." Steven Wright
Yes companies or corporations can own other companies and hide their owners in some places, (not in major countries) but the top of the pyramid has to be human owners. It’s all paperwork so a robot could get away with it just as criminals can steal identities. I am not sure that ownership would interest AI although control might, and the main issue here is recognition and protection of inventive steps, useful ones. (A patent application has to show that it is useful,) but inventors sometimes invent problems to solve.
sicut vis videre esto
When we realize that patterns don't exist in the universe, they are a template that we hold to the universe to make sense of it, it all makes a lot more sense.
Originally Posted by Ken G