Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Does uncertainty and/or entropy get internalized for matter to become physical?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Posts
    10

    Question Does uncertainty and/or entropy get internalized for matter to become physical?

    Does matter have to retain heat information (entropy) to remain physical?

    A Bose–Einstein condensate says yes.

    I think there is something to an object being fully wave collapsed. An object that doesn't have the possibility to go into superposition. Does degrees of freedom have something to do with it?

    Does an object have to be large enough to have internal entropy be fully physical?

    I think there are levels or percentages to completion for wave collapse. Only particles deal with the chance of multiple instances of decoherence in their path.
    Does decoherence bother running on objects that are fully and automatically wave collapsed?

    Can we describe wave collapse as quantum information being manifested to physical matter in spacetime?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Posts
    10
    Quantum information manifests as matter with wave collapse, but it needs excited internal information to remain local by itself?

    Is the laser cooling in a Bose–Einstein condensate lowering entropy? Does matter have to retain heat information to remain physical/local? Is entropy excited quantum information?

    Is the quantum/classical boundary determined by the object's ability to contain internal entropy?

    Does decoherence summon and/or compile quantum information?

    Each instance of decoherence in the path of a particle re-queries for its quantum information. This is why two instances of decoherence brings fringes back to the final panel. The quantum which-way experiments have the wrong premise.

    Annihilation is a different situation. There isn't anything to re-query quantum information. We end up with Dark Matter.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Posts
    10
    I'm trying to provoke new ideas.

    Does spacetime have layers?

    Is energy, raw quantum information? Is wave collapse, energy converting to matter? Is decoherence when something accesses quantum information in a pilot wave? Does that matter then play by the rules of spacetime?

    Matter flows on Time, Space, and Gravity. Does time dilation occur with information density? Is Dark Matter, information that imprinted before annihilation? Is imprinted gravity forward only like Time? Does that mean Gravity is in the temporal dimension?

    Does the Bose–Einstein condensate explain the quantum/classical boundary?

    Was reality strictly quantum information/energy before the Big Bang? Was the Big Bang the first use of decoherence and wave collapse?

    If energy is quantum information, does that explain why we can't directly detect dark energy?

    Is gamma-ray bursts, quantum information? Is this how the quantum information of a new black hole escapes? Do gamma-ray bursts continue or is hawking radiation the only other way for information to avoid the information paradox?

    Are gamma-rays always released from a feeding black hole?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Posts
    10
    I suspect the original formation of a Black Hole is Gravity Dents (Dark Matter) forming from annihilation that occurs in a collapsing star. Gamma-ray bursts is information being released from the annihilation.

    Is the acceleration of the universe from our parent black hole feeding which causes more quantum information/energy into the whole system?

    Is inflation from the initial formation of our parent black hole?

    The holographic principle is looking pretty good right about now.
    Is there something special about our parent black hole that the ones inside don't have? Could there be a layer of physics encoded into our projection?

    Did God reverse engineer BlackHole.exe to start this reality?

    Was it necessary for us to be in a Black Hole for the physics to be right? For Decoherence and Wave Collapse to be a thing?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    9,498
    Quote Originally Posted by Hindsight View Post
    I suspect the original formation of a Black Hole is Gravity Dents (Dark Matter) forming from annihilation that occurs in a collapsing star. Gamma-ray bursts is information being released from the annihilation.

    Is the acceleration of the universe from our parent black hole feeding which causes more quantum information/energy into the whole system?

    Is inflation from the initial formation of our parent black hole?

    The holographic principle is looking pretty good right about now.
    Is there something special about our parent black hole that the ones inside don't have? Could there be a layer of physics encoded into our projection?

    Did God reverse engineer BlackHole.exe to start this reality?

    Was it necessary for us to be in a Black Hole for the physics to be right? For Decoherence and Wave Collapse to be a thing?

    Dear Hindsight

    This is not the place to put out hard-to-understand ATM questions.
    This is the place where you present your ATM ideas and defend them if questioned.
    If you have nothing but such questions, then this thread will be closed.
    All comments made in red are moderator comments. Please, read the rules of the forum here, the special rules for the ATM section here and conspiracy theories. If you think a post is inappropriate, don't comment on it in thread but report it using the /!\ button in the lower left corner of each message. But most of all, have fun!

    Catch me on twitter: @tusenfem
    Catch Rosetta Plasma Consortium on twitter: @Rosetta_RPC

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Posts
    10
    You can't handle rhetorical questions? The ideas are there for you to attack. It seems like you look for any reason to close these threads.

    The Schwartzchild Radius just adds more evidence to us being in a Black Hole.

    Our parent black hole doesn't play by all the same rules. If it doesn't have wave collapse or decoherence, it is probably feeding from a never-ending cloud of quantum waves.

    Gravity, Dark matter, and energy are also likely different outside of our parent Black Hole.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
    Posts
    50,008
    Quote Originally Posted by Hindsight View Post
    You can't handle rhetorical questions? The ideas are there for you to attack. It seems like you look for any reason to close these threads.

    The Schwartzchild Radius just adds more evidence to us being in a Black Hole.

    Our parent black hole doesn't play by all the same rules. If it doesn't have wave collapse or decoherence, it is probably feeding from a never-ending cloud of quantum waves.

    Gravity, Dark matter, and energy are also likely different outside of our parent Black Hole.
    Hindsight

    Rule 17 states "Do not respond to moderation in-thread, unless asked a question by a moderator." You were not asked a question by tusenfem, you were given instructions, which you are ignoring.

    All of that will earn you an infraction. You need to start learning our rules and following our instructions, or we will close this thread.

    Stop with the one liners and clearly present your idea.
    At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

    All moderation in purple - The rules

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Posts
    10
    I have answers to the measurement problem, decoherence, wave collapse, the quantum/classical boundary, gravity, dark matter, dark energy, the big bang, black holes, inflation, and the acceleration of the universe. Maybe what I've asked is worth reading through again.

    Our parent universe is a sea of quantum waves with a single black hole in which our reality is in. The start of this black hole is our big bang. The black hole has the holographic principle running on it with an extra layer of Physics and Math that our black holes likely don't have. The whole reason for this black hole is because this place couldn't exist otherwise. We asked to be in this physical reality by eating from the Tree of Knowledge. Can you think of anything that causes more sin than physicality? Do you want to get mad I'm bringing a god into this? This place has a command prompt where the holographic principle is taking place. Physics doesn't just magically appear with the right settings for life. When something triggers decoherence in a pilot wave, it is the program/god modifying the holographic principle that is notified that something should be physical with wave collapse.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    7,311
    Can you present your ideas as a scientific theory? By that I mean a structured format including postulates, definitions of terms you are using in a non-standard way, behaviours of these entities and ideally a mathematical structure or at least underpinning logical framework. Then you need hypotheses to test and ideally some testable predictions different from the current mainstream theories.

    A series of questions rooted in poorly defined or non-scientific concepts doesn't really work to advance physics, no matter how many rhetorical flourishes you add to it.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Posts
    10
    Entanglement and the Database Structure of Reality

    The program running with the Holographic Principle uses a database. It isn't a coincidence that quantum computers are amazing at database work. I discovered the structure when analyzing twin prime columns:
    6n-1 | 6n | 6n+1
    The root of the database ends up being { - | 0 | + }
    I figured out the the left columns behaves differently than the right when it comes to the numbers that are not primes in their columns. Pseudoprimes. The left column pseudoprimes always use multiples from both columns to generate pseudoprimes. The right column pseudoprimes always use multiples from the same column. Two unlike signs is negative, two like signs is positive. You get pseudoprimes from active multiplication. Subatomic Energy Levels can't use numbers that are actively multiplying.
    The rows of the columns are quantum information containers, it ends up being a tree.
    Everything in a tree is entangled. When two atoms become entangled, you are getting two sets of prime columns inside a container. This is showing how entangled particles end up with opposite spins after decoherence.

    { [ - 0 + ] }
    { [- 0 +] 0 [- 0 +] }

    It also explains why it is faster than light, both particles are in the same quantum information container.
    Last edited by Hindsight; 2020-Sep-01 at 02:56 PM.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Nowhere (middle)
    Posts
    38,011
    So, you're saying a principle described by mathematics, follows the rules of mathematics.
    "I'm planning to live forever. So far, that's working perfectly." Steven Wright

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Peters Creek, Alaska
    Posts
    13,476
    OP banned as a sock puppet of a previously banned member. Thread closed.
    Forum Rules►  ◄FAQ►  ◄ATM Forum Advice►  ◄Conspiracy Advice
    Click http://cosmoquest.org/forum/images/buttons/report-40b.png to report a post (even this one) to the moderation team.


    Man is a tool-using animal. Nowhere do you find him without tools; without tools he is nothing, with tools he is all. — Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •