Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: A new Climate Model Suggests That Venus Never had Oceans

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    30,170

    A new Climate Model Suggests That Venus Never had Oceans

    A new study has cast doubt on whether or not Venus ever had oceans, challenging the notion that it was once a potentially-habitable world.
    The post A new Climate Model Suggests That Venus Never had Oceans appeared first on Universe Today.


    More...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    125
    Briefly skimmed the paper and have a question, their thesis mentions the slow rotation of Venus as a factor for their model preventing day side cloud formation.

    However other models I've seen directly attribute Venus's slowing rotation rate (which has been recently measured to still be occurring I believe) to the loss of it's water and the subsequent development it's thick dense rapidly moving atmosphere as a result. This mechanism is also what accounts for the apparent cessation of the plate tectonics and mass volcanic resurfacing @500-700 million years ago.

    Which model then is more probable?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Norfolk UK and some of me is in Northern France
    Posts
    10,229
    The competing ideas about whether clouds formed on the day side or the night side of Venus and the other assumptions that make those ideas switch around emphasise , for me, how important the understanding of clouds is in modelling climate.

    If this study Is correct and Venus never had surface liquid water, it also tightens up the concept of a Goldilocks planet for life to evolve.
    sicut vis videre esto
    When we realize that patterns don't exist in the universe, they are a template that we hold to the universe to make sense of it, it all makes a lot more sense.
    Originally Posted by Ken G

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •