Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Science and post-modernism - are they reconcileable?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    405

    Science and post-modernism - are they reconcileable?

    Well I was just reading a post made on another forum by somebody trying to defend teaching creationism from a post-modernist point of view. This got me thinking does post-modernism have any place in modern scientific thinking? Iirc post-modernism is essentially based around the belief that there is no absolute truth. Whilst this may be arguable in the arena of philosophy, politics, morality or similar it isn't really applicable in the domain of science as most scientific thinking revolves around an assumption (supported by a truck load of evidence) that there are fundamental truths about the universe (e.g. the law of conservation of energy. Actually it's better than a law because in society you can break a law ). Imo the day post-modernism is introduced into the scientific mainstream is the day science dies, but that's just me I guess.

    Any thoughts?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    428
    Quote Originally Posted by Zachary
    Actually it's better than a law because in society you can break a law
    Very true, our society should make some laws like that too, , well even in science a new discovery might end up proving any present law wrong, u know, im not talking about any in particular...
    i also wanted to mention when i first read the thread heading i didnot know what reconcileable meant so i looked it up on MS Word and then on wikipedea, where i didnt find any except meanings for reconciliation, i am not sure but is that a real word? i might be totally wrong.. in that case just ignore me.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,056
    Quote Originally Posted by Laminal Cockroach
    Very true, our society should make some laws like that too, , well even in science a new discovery might end up proving any present law wrong, u know, im not talking about any in particular...
    i also wanted to mention when i first read the thread heading i didnot know what reconcileable meant so i looked it up on MS Word and then on wikipedea, where i didnt find any except meanings for reconciliation, i am not sure but is that a real word? i might be totally wrong.. in that case just ignore me.
    uuuuh - I don't think this will work.. a law is fundamental. It's been poven both empirically and mathematically. Theories are breakable, at least in theory 8-{)}
    If some new discovery breaks a natural law, then the law wasn't expressed properly...

    as for reconcileable... just chalk it up to not having a spell-check program in here.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    16,643

    Re: Science and post-modernism - are they reconcileable?

    Quote Originally Posted by Zachary
    Well I was just reading a post made on another forum by somebody trying to defend teaching creationism from a post-modernist point of view. This got me thinking does post-modernism have any place in modern scientific thinking?
    No.
    Quote Originally Posted by Zachary
    Iirc post-modernism is essentially based around the belief that there is no absolute truth. Whilst this may be arguable in the arena of philosophy, politics, morality or similar it isn't really applicable in the domain of science as most scientific thinking revolves around an assumption (supported by a truck load of evidence) that there are fundamental truths about the universe (e.g. the law of conservation of energy. Actually it's better than a law because in society you can break a law ). Imo the day post-modernism is introduced into the scientific mainstream is the day science dies, but that's just me I guess.

    Any thoughts?
    Post-modernism is to science as intelligent design is to evolution.

    As ID is creationism in a slightly different guise, post-modernism is just new age baloney dressed up in a different costume.

    Same old baloney.

    And of course it's taken over a lot of areas of collegiate academia. Not unexpected since it's following the same infection paths that the original new age crap did during the 1960s and 1970s.

    Same old baloney.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    247
    post-modernism, new ageism. its all the same.

    its meaningless and undermines meaning in everything. it has no place in science, or even in society.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    8,774
    Post-modernism has set the stage for the cultural relativism. I have seen people using Einstein´s Relativity to support the assumption that all points of view are equally valid.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,056
    Quote Originally Posted by Argos
    Post-modernism has set the stage for the cultural relativism. I have seen people using Einstein´s Relativity to support the assumption that all points of view are equally valid.

    Oh, my (pardon the expression) god!

    I bet they live in Boulder

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    4,135
    It reminds me of the old joke about what you get if you cross a mafioso godfather with a post-modernist philosopher? Someone who makes you an offer that you don't understand.

    I guess you had to be there...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    11,496
    Thats the best one I've heard today!
    I love it! Take that Derrida!

    The only one more funny than that I heard on NPR the other day. (Wait Wait! Don't Tell me! IIRC)

    There was talk about questionable on-line buying practices of folks in the UK while on a tear.

    "That's a whole new kind of drunk."

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    3,364
    Here's an interesting Wikipedia article that is directly related to postmodernism and science.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    228
    Quote Originally Posted by Fortis
    It reminds me of the old joke about what you get if you cross a mafioso godfather with a post-modernist philosopher? Someone who makes you an offer that you don't understand.

    I guess you had to be there...
    Thread derail warning! The version I heard was the Scottish Mafia making you an offer you can't understand. (I can say that, I'm Scottish...)

    Cheers
    John

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    8,589
    heh heh!

    ----
    If you ever need to write a postmodernist essay, try this link!
    It generates random postmodernism.
    http://www.elsewhere.org/cgi-bin/postmodern/
    Try it again! It's different every time.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    16,643

    Re: Science and post-modernism - are they reconcileable?

    Quote Originally Posted by enginelessjohn
    Thread derail warning! The version I heard was the Scottish Mafia making you an offer you can't understand. (I can say that, I'm Scottish...)

    Cheers
    John
    Then there was the Jewish Mafia making you an offer you have to accept because you feel guilty about not calling your mother.

    The Redneck Mafia making you an offer that your dog won't hunt.

    The Southern California Mafia making you an offer that you can't mellow out of.

    The Valley Mafia making you an offer, that's like, totally awesome for them, but for you, like, it's skipping the mall for a week? Fer sure, fer sure, and you can like refuse it and like go to some more clothing stores and stuff? Oh my Goh-od! That would be, like, seh-ow ba-a-a-a-d? NO WAY!

    The New England Mafia makin' ya an wicked good offah ya cahn't tuhn dahn.

    Plus the Garbage Collector Mafia making you an offer you can't refuse.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    7,303

    Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Zachary
    Well I was just reading a post made on another forum by somebody trying to defend teaching creationism from a post-modernist point of view. This got me thinking does post-modernism have any place in modern scientific thinking? Iirc post-modernism is essentially based around the belief that there is no absolute truth.
    Reading the Wikipedia's page on postmodernism, I don't get quite that impression.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    22
    As a history major at a liberal arts college, I have been frustrated by the relatively common sentiment among my professors to believe that scientific reasoning is just ane of a variety of "equally valid" worldviews. Some of them are loath to admit that science has far more explanatory and predictive power than its "copetition." Fortunately, my Old English professor has told me that postmodernism is dead, but that nothing has taken its place. I certainly hope that she's right and that "PoMo" will be replaced by something less absurd fairly soon. I'm not so sure I'm optimistic, though........

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,005
    Quote Originally Posted by Argos
    I have seen people using Einstein´s Relativity to support the assumption that all points of view are equally valid.
    Including points of view with absolute right and wrong?

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2011-Jul-19, 11:50 PM
  2. Replies: 92
    Last Post: 2010-Jan-18, 10:54 PM
  3. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 2008-Oct-15, 12:25 AM
  4. Replies: 181
    Last Post: 2006-Jun-14, 09:58 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •