Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: 13 things...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,280

    13 things...

    Has anyone seen this?

    Some items just seem to be bad thinking. Others may be outdated (though the article says it was updated).

    Guidence, please?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    N.E.Ohio
    Posts
    22,006
    Quote Originally Posted by Grand_Lunar View Post
    Some items just seem to be bad thinking. Others may be outdated (though the article says it was updated).
    Yep; sounds like a reporter taking the woo stance and ignoring some of the mundane possibilities. Could be good to question, but not making sense? That's only if you don't want to make sense of them.

    Quote Originally Posted by Grand_Lunar View Post
    Guidence, please?
    Move on...

    Edit: for test only.
    Last edited by NEOWatcher; 2007-Jun-27 at 02:57 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,280
    Thanks, Neo.

    What I was hoping, though, was how to debunk them.
    I found this link at IMDb, and I'd like to educate the folks there. Gotta spread the skill of critical thinking!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    7,157
    These tests on homeopathy proved that it works. Admittedly there are all these other tests that show it doesn't work, but these tests show that it does work so it must work. I mean there is no way that performing a large number of tests might end up with a couple of them giveing positive results by chance. It's conclusive proof. If I can hit the bull's eye on an archery target twice it proves that I'm a great archer. It doesn't matter if I used a hundred arrows to hit the bull's eye twice, the two that hit are conclusive proof.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    4,101
    And there is other evidence that supports the idea of matter composed of multiple neutrons: neutron stars. These bodies, which contain an enormous number of bound neutrons, suggest that as yet unexplained forces come into play when neutrons gather en masse.
    Um... gravity?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    N.E.Ohio
    Posts
    22,006
    Quote Originally Posted by Grand_Lunar View Post
    Thanks, Neo.

    What I was hoping, though, was how to debunk them.
    I found this link at IMDb, and I'd like to educate the folks there. Gotta spread the skill of critical thinking!
    Unfortunately, some of it takes knowledge of each subject. I can only give a "gut feel" response because I know there is more to each situation than they are reporting. So; even though it's enough to convince me, it's not enough to build an argument around.

    Some of them are mysteries though. Effects of the mind are especially elusive, and do require more study. The BB also, but research is occuring, and theories do exist.

    But; Some of those items do give clues as to how to debunk them. Some of them indicate "some people think that...", when in fact, expanding on the statement will debunk it.

    And the presentation of "not making sense", in itself, is too vague of a statement to make. What do they mean by it? Common Sense? Doesn't fit theory? No... quantum physics doesn't make sense (at least to most people), but it does fit theory.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    3,974
    Quote Originally Posted by Ronald Brak View Post
    These tests on homeopathy proved that it works. Admittedly there are all these other tests that show it doesn't work, but these tests show that it does work so it must work. I mean there is no way that performing a large number of tests might end up with a couple of them giveing positive results by chance. It's conclusive proof. If I can hit the bull's eye on an archery target twice it proves that I'm a great archer. It doesn't matter if I used a hundred arrows to hit the bull's eye twice, the two that hit are conclusive proof.
    Is that sarcastic or facetious? IMO, if you hit the bull only twice in 100 shots, it proves you are not a very good archer. Of course we'd need to know the conditions. Were you blindfolded, was it at night in the dark, were you using one of those little plastic souveneir shop bows that can only shoot 10', etc.

    So give us the particulars and then we'll see.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    7,157
    25 meters, sunlight, minimal wind, 30 pound bow.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    15,801
    Quote Originally Posted by Grand_Lunar View Post
    Has anyone seen this?
    Yes. And, discussed it in 2005: topic 13 Things that do not make sense?
    0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
    Skepticism enables us to distinguish fancy from fact, to test our speculations. --Carl Sagan

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    N.E.Ohio
    Posts
    22,006
    Quote Originally Posted by 01101001 View Post
    Yes. And, discussed it in 2005: topic 13 Things that do not make sense?
    Wow, the titles are so different?

    I probably would have looked if I noticed the statement in the article:
    From issue 2491 of New Scientist magazine, 19 March 2005, page 30
    Now; can someone explain why they are reprinting it? (Other than they are lazy, or found that it is too much money to actually develop new stories)

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,280
    Quote Originally Posted by 01101001 View Post
    Yes. And, discussed it in 2005: topic 13 Things that do not make sense?
    D'oh! I've been ToSeeked! (even if he's not in that thread)

    I too am curious why it's been revamped. Maybe something new has been found. Or not.

    I wonder if the homoepathy effect observed is just a variation on the placebo effect?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    3,974
    Quote Originally Posted by Ronald Brak View Post
    25 meters, sunlight, minimal wind, 30 pound bow.
    I still can't tell if your comments were in support of homeopathic medicine or if you were being sarcastic and don't atually buy into it.

    I've never heard of a single controlled study that positively supported it.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    14,782
    Nothing obviously wrong with the article that I can see.
    Nothing wrong with updating an old article with new info.

    This thread brought to you by Emily Lattila.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,280
    Not the article, maybe. It's the content that needs attention!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    7,157
    I still can't tell if your comments were in support of homeopathic medicine or if you were being sarcastic and don't atually buy into it.
    Okay, I'll admit I was firing the bow at 2.5m and it took me a hundred shots to get the two bull's eyes that prove that I'm a great archer.

Similar Threads

  1. So things fast approaching have a red tint and things fast leaving have a blue tint?
    By Ping Everything in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2011-Feb-08, 03:36 PM
  2. Replies: 102
    Last Post: 2011-Feb-06, 08:50 PM
  3. Where are things now!?
    By DaveBlack in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 2010-Aug-13, 12:39 AM
  4. why do most things orbit other things?
    By dirty_g in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2006-Dec-31, 05:01 PM
  5. Seeing things
    By ChromeStar in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2004-Nov-25, 02:21 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •