Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 38

Thread: Would Pluto and Neptune ever crash?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,905

    Would Pluto and Neptune ever crash?

    I was simulating a few thousand years of solar system orbits with Sky View Cafe and noticed that the orbits change a lot during a few millennium.

    Pluto (the former planet) and Neptune's orbits gets very close and they cross over at times, so :

    Assuming we give it billions of years, is it possible for Pluto and Neptune to crash?

    Is our measurement of positions/speed accurate enough to predict such a crash?

    The gravity might also play a role and prevent the two from crashing, how would that work? Can we predict that it would "never" crash?

    And finally if they do crash what can we expect? Would earth be in any danger?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,794

    Harmonics

    As I recall, and without checking the references, I think Pluto and Neptune are in resonant orbits and won't collide. But, to quote Charles Barkely, "I could be wrong."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    772
    FWIW, this supports John (and my) recollection.

    http://www.astronomycafe.net/qadir/q364.html

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    18,103
    All these programs become less accurate the farther you run them from the present day, and this is particularly so for the orbit of Pluto.
    In particular, for Sky View Café:
    Pluto is covered by Meeus' adaptation of the work of Aldo Vitagliano. The accuracy of the given method is said to be quite high, better than one-tenth of an arc second, but only for the years 1885-2099. I have no idea how much error creeps in outside of that time span, but I have made no effort to limit viewing Pluto to this range of years, so keep in mind that, beyond that span of time, I'm using the formula outside of its recommended range.
    Like John Mendenhall and Saluki, my understanding is that the 2:3 resonance between Neptune and Pluto (as well as the other Plutinos) prevents them ever being in the same place at the same time.

    Grant Hutchison

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,905
    Thanks for the answers.

    But in the hypothetical situation that they "do" crash what might we expect on earth? What would happen to Neptune?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    6,011
    Forever is a very long time... To say these planets will not or can not collide is on the fringe of reality. If these objects cross each others path then yes they could theoretically be in conflict. The question then is. Do they?

    Your last point regarding the Earth being in any danger. Probably not. Pluto is smaller than our moon and Neptune is a gas giant. Considerable disruption to these planets would not effect Earth in any way.
    Astrologers would need to rewrite their charts...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    772
    Quote Originally Posted by astromark View Post
    The question then is. Do they?
    I have been trying to dig up a graphic that shows it clearly, but I am fairly certain tha the orbits do not intersect. If you look at a 2d representation of the 3d orbit it does indeed look like they intersect at 2 points, however, in the real 3d situation, pluto is well away from Neptune's orbit at the points where it appears to cross on the 2d drawings.

    Edit: This one shows it somewhat well. You can see that the orbit of Pluto is actually outside the orbit of Neptune at the points where they appear to intersect in most renderings.

    http://www.daviddarling.info/images/Pluto_orbit.gif

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    18,103
    Quote Originally Posted by Saluki View Post
    I have been trying to dig up a graphic that shows it clearly, but I am fairly certain tha the orbits do not intersect.
    Here's one I prepared earlier.
    It's a shallow diagonal view from north of the ecliptic, prepared in Celestia, showing that when Pluto crosses through the plane of Neptune's orbit, it's still well outside the orbit of Neptune. It only moves closer to the sun than Neptune when it is well to the ecliptic north.

    Grant Hutchison

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,425
    I simulated their orbits, and wrote a short article for my website about the simulation and their 3:2 resonance: http://www.orbitsimulator.com/gravit...les/pluto.html . There's an animation on this page that shows Neptune virtually "repel" Pluto's advancing orbit in a rotating frame anytime it gets too close.

    In addition to this 3:2 resonance, there's also a resonance involving their inclinations. Although no info on this resonance is included in my article, I think this is how it works: If Pluto were to cross Neptune's distance while it and Neptune were at the same true longitudes in their orbits (which can't happen due to the forementioned 3:2 resonance), they still would not collide because Pluto, with its high inclination, would be either high above or far below Neptune's position. As Pluto's nodes precess with time, and/or its inclination fluxuates, lowering the angle between its orbital plane and Neptune's, potentially bringing its ascending and decending nodes with respect to Neptune's orbital plane dangerously close to Neptune's position, Neptune should also repel the precession, and/or advancing inclination, so even over eons of time, they will never come close. Don't trust that I got this completely right, but it's an easy Google to get a better explanation of this additional resonance.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    4,101
    Quote Originally Posted by astromark View Post
    Your last point regarding the Earth being in any danger. Probably not. Pluto is smaller than our moon and Neptune is a gas giant. Considerable disruption to these planets would not effect Earth in any way.
    Pluto's mass: 1.3 * 10^22 kg
    Neptune escape velocity: 23500 m/sec
    Resulting kinetic energy, to 2 sig. digits: 3.6 * 10^30 J
    Sun's energy output: 3.9 * 10^26 J/sec

    The impact would produce almost as much energy as Sun emits in 10,000 seconds and would last about 100 seconds -- the time it takes for Pluto to travel its own diameter at that speed.

    So for about 100 seconds Neptune would be 100 times brighter than Sun. But at 30 AU from Earth, that would shrink to 0.1 as bright as Sun. Being a point source, it will probably do serious retinal damage to anyone looking at it, but that's about the extent of effects on Earth.

    Until debris starts hitting 80 years later

  11. #11
    The best long term calculations of the solar system motion are now believed to be accurate for about 20,000,000 years into the past and future. Pluto is still there for all of that time. These calculations are now so accurate that one of the Milankovitch cycles of 405,000 years is now used as the primary means of accurate dating of geological formations for the last 23,000,000 years.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,166
    What would be cool if Neptune disrupted Pluto's orbit, sending it inward towards the sun and creating a comet like orbit with, possible, the largest comet ever witnessed.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,425
    Quote Originally Posted by rtomes View Post
    The best long term calculations of the solar system motion are now believed to be accurate for about 20,000,000 years into the past and future. Pluto is still there for all of that time. These calculations are now so accurate that one of the Milankovitch cycles of 405,000 years is now used as the primary means of accurate dating of geological formations for the last 23,000,000 years.
    There are certain properties of orbiting bodies that remain accurate even longer than that, and I would guess that stable resonances are one of them. But I would doubt that we can tell with any certainty where in its orbit any of the planets will be in 20 million years, or even 2 million years. Each orbit's size, shape, and orientation can be described by 5 orbital elements, and these elements are know to oscillate over long periods of time due to perturbations primarily by the other planets. If we know for example that Earth's inclination varies periodically by 3 degrees, then we always know its inclination to within 3 degrees. Similarily, if we know that a planet's semi-major axis varies in cycles by 100,000 kilometers, then we will always know to within 100,000 kilometers the planet's average distance to the Sun. But if our knowledge about a planet's semi-major axis is off by even 1/100 of 1 percent, then its period is off by this amount ^(3/2), so its known position in its orbit begins to drift, changing its 6th orbital element, mean longitude, in a linear rather than a cyclic fashion. Unlike the error in the other orbital elements, this error builds, orbit by orbit. After a few thousand years, we may be able to accurately predict an orbit's size, shape, and orientation, but exactly where the planet will be in its orbit will not be known.

    The ~400,000 year eccentricity cycle isn't exact. It definately jumps out at you when you look at a graph, but sometimes it might be only 398,000 yr, while at other times it be 409,000. I don't have any doubt that we can accurately say that in 20 million years the Earth will still have its ~400,000 cycle, but whether we are at a minima or maxima on this trend would not be known. It's similar to not adjusting a clock for a few years (assume the batteries are good the whole time). I can tell you with confidence that the minute hand will still be going around once per hour, but because of small errors in the clock's precision, I would be doubtful that it would be displaying the correct time.

    So even though I might not have a clue as to where Neptune will be in 2 million years, because of the resonance, I can confidently say that Pluto won't be anywhere near it.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    13,423
    Quote Originally Posted by RalofTyr View Post
    What would be cool if Neptune disrupted Pluto's orbit, sending it inward towards the sun and creating a comet like orbit with, possible, the largest comet ever witnessed.
    You mean like Sending Venus in at us while it is spewing influenza all over the place?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,794

    Humph

    Quote Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
    You mean like Sending Venus in at us while it is spewing influenza all over the place?
    This idea will never fly.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    4,813
    Quote Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
    You mean like Sending Venus in at us while it is spewing influenza all over the place?
    Homer Simpson: Manna! Mmmmmm......

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    350
    Herunder an animated gif showing the outer planets . The gif was generated using the JPL Near Earth Asteroids site , with descending point of view .
    It's clear that the orbits do not intersect .
    Attached Images Attached Images

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    3,841
    Quote Originally Posted by astromark View Post
    Astrologers would need to rewrite their charts...
    But they do, and have done ever since planets more distant than the naked eye ones were discovered.
    Doesn't worry them at all.
    Bit like sub-atomic physics - "Ah! There are even smaller(distant) particles(planets)! That explains why my predictions are a bit off!"

    John

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    16,267
    Pluto is still a planet, it's just a dwarf planet and not a regular one.
    The greatest journey of all time, for all to see
    Every mission makes our dreams reality
    And our destiny begins with you and me
    Through all space and time, the achievement of mankind
    As we sail the sea of discovery, on heroes’ wings we fly!

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    18,103
    Quote Originally Posted by KaiYeves View Post
    Pluto is still a planet, it's just a dwarf planet and not a regular one.
    According to the IAU resolution, a dwarf planet is not a planet. (Some people object to the grammatical logic of that construction, but that's another matter. )

    Grant Hutchison

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    16,267
    That's what I meant, it still has planet in the name.
    The greatest journey of all time, for all to see
    Every mission makes our dreams reality
    And our destiny begins with you and me
    Through all space and time, the achievement of mankind
    As we sail the sea of discovery, on heroes’ wings we fly!

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,425
    Quote Originally Posted by grant hutchison View Post
    (Some people object to the grammatical logic of that construction, but that's another matter. )
    Like me! I just assumed "dwarf"=adjective, "planet"=noun

    If we take the IAU literally, is Earth still a planet? "A planet is a celestial body that..."

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    13,423
    In that case...

    Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune aren't really planets. They are more like really really really big gas bubbles.

    Maybe Cosmic farts.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    18,103
    Quote Originally Posted by KaiYeves View Post
    That's what I meant, it still has planet in the name.
    I assumed your post was in response to the OP's use of the phrase "former planet". I was pointing out that "former planet" is an accurate enough description, despite the new terminology. If you meant something else, then I apologize.

    Grant Hutchison

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    16,267
    It was in response to the OP. I wrote a great and geeky essay about public and media reactions to the Pluto controversy. It included relevant quotes from Jurassic Park, X-Men, High School Musical, Pale Blue Dot, and Star Wars: The Phantom Menace. They were all, believe it or not, related to a central theme you may be able to guess at. (Hint: it's also a major theme in X-Men) If you'd like to see it, just ask.
    The greatest journey of all time, for all to see
    Every mission makes our dreams reality
    And our destiny begins with you and me
    Through all space and time, the achievement of mankind
    As we sail the sea of discovery, on heroes’ wings we fly!

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    13,423
    Asks.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    313
    Quote Originally Posted by tony873004 View Post
    Like me! I just assumed "dwarf"=adjective, "planet"=noun

    If we take the IAU literally, is Earth still a planet? "A planet is a celestial body that..."
    This is exactly why the IAU definition makes no sense. The term dwarf planet is an adjective modified by a noun, not a "compound noun," as those who voted for this definition claim. Dwarf stars are still a subclass of stars; dwarf galaxies are still a subclass of galaxies. Saying a "dwarf planet" is not a planet at all is just plain ridiculous and amounts to the IAU concocting its own grammar to fit a specific agenda.

    Why should we accept that the vote of four percent of this organization changes reality and somehow makes Pluto less than a full fledged planet? Even members of the IAU state that they have no authority to impose their decision and that no one is bound to accept it.

    Hopefully, at their next General Assembly, the IAU will revisit this issue and do a better job with the definition. Passing the resolution that failed, the one that placed dwarf planets as a subclass of the broader term planets would be a good start.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    18,103
    Quote Originally Posted by laurele View Post
    This is exactly why the IAU definition makes no sense.
    As I said, that is "another matter": off-topic for this thread.
    Please don't hijack other people's threads in order to pursue your own agenda.

    Grant Hutchison

  29. 2007-Oct-07, 08:52 PM

  30. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    313
    My apologies; I did not see myself as "hijacking" this thread, as the planet vs. dwarf planet issue had already been raised in previous posts.

    To KaiYeves: No, we have not "known" for the past 12 months that the answer is eight planets. We've known that some people view the solar system this way while others do not. As an opponent of the IAU decision, I can tell you that my position is not based on fear of change but on the many problems with both the process that led to the change and the actual result. I don't believe people should simply accept change for change's sake, especially when they have researched the issue and genuinely come to the conclusion that the change is a step in the wrong direction and when other professionals in the field agree that the change creates more problems than it solves.

    The argument that "keeping Pluto would lead to a large and tangled solar system that would be a burden for students to remember" is hardly a scientific one. Nature is not "designed" so humans can have easy classification systems. If there are 200 planets in the solar system, then that's what there are, regardless of the implications for teaching them. Actually, memorizing their names is less important than understanding the concepts of what the gas giants, terrestrial planets, ice dwarfs, satellites of planets, etc. are.

    Supporting the planet status of Pluto, Eris, Ceres, and other KBOs that have achieved hydrostatic equilibrium is not the equivalent of "looking back." On the contrary, it is looking forward to an expanded and broadened view of our solar system, and in eight years, valuable new information from both the Dawn mission and New Horizons.

  31. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    18,103
    Quote Originally Posted by laurele View Post
    My apologies; I did not see myself as "hijacking" this thread, as the planet vs. dwarf planet issue had already been raised in previous posts.
    Well, it sure is heading in a new direction, which is just the same old direction.
    Adieu.

    Grant Hutchison

Similar Threads

  1. “Pluto-Killer” Sets Sights on Neptune
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2011-Sep-18, 11:00 PM
  2. Could Pluto and Neptune ever collide?
    By banquo's_bumble_puppy in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 2010-Apr-22, 03:43 PM
  3. Pluto & Neptune
    By rick95838 in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 2008-Mar-24, 07:54 PM
  4. Pluto and Neptune: do they really cross orbits?
    By jseefcoot in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 2006-Aug-29, 01:26 PM
  5. Neptune to Pluto distance
    By zwi in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 2003-Mar-11, 10:05 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •