Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Something for 01101001

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Sioux Falls, SD
    Posts
    8,844

    Something for 01101001

    Hey, 01101001, I was just wondering if you've seen the cover art for the new 20th Anniversary DVD of The Princess Bride.

    And if so, what you think of it.



    (I can't help wondering why they dotted the "i" in "Bride" but not the one in "Princess"...)
    Sometimes you win, sometimes you learn

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    268
    Because you wouldn't get the cool word-art effect if you did.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Sioux Falls, SD
    Posts
    8,844
    Quote Originally Posted by Jason_Roberts View Post
    Because you wouldn't get the cool word-art effect if you did.
    Why not? The "ri" in "Princess" flips over to become the "ri" in "Bride." That two-letter combination could be a perfect ambigram all by itself. As it is, not only is there only one dot, but the two r's aren't even the same.
    Sometimes you win, sometimes you learn

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    15,801
    Quote Originally Posted by SeanF View Post
    Why not? The "ri" in "Princess" flips over to become the "ri" in "Bride." That two-letter combination could be a perfect ambigram all by itself. As it is, not only is there only one dot, but the two r's aren't even the same.
    Good eye. I'm torn. I don't like that the design sort of blows the correct case of the letters, with an internal capital R. However, it does eliminate some repetition of having two similar "ri" digraphs. Sometimes repetition re-inforces the design; letters are supposed to look similar when they reappear. But, a design goal might have been to suggest more whimsy.

    I wonder if the artist thought about the choices. I don't recognize the author by style. Someone who doesn't regularly do ambigrams might not see the opportunity and just be happy to achieve something readable. A quick web scan didn't reveal one of the usual artists taking credit for it.

    I don't think I would have settled for the "cess" solution. I suspect better could be had, but it's only instinct. Maybe not.

    Anyway, it's always good to see more ambigrams in the popular media. It translates to more public interest and eventually more website hits for me.

    It triggered a connection in my mind -- maybe because I had seen the Queen and Duke thread -- and I was compelled to do this for a different princess (and because Diana is bound to be a good search-engine term):

    0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
    Skepticism enables us to distinguish fancy from fact, to test our speculations. --Carl Sagan

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    16,268
    I saw a little of that a while ago. Man, it's funny!
    The greatest journey of all time, for all to see
    Every mission makes our dreams reality
    And our destiny begins with you and me
    Through all space and time, the achievement of mankind
    As we sail the sea of discovery, on heroes’ wings we fly!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    15,801
    Which brings us to Garrett Lisi.

    Since I just invoked the name, and a search engine might bring unfortunate parties here, this isn't the Garrett Lisi "Theory of Everything" topic. If you're looking for that, see: New Scientist reports: Theory of Everything.

    Far from thoroughly understanding his ideas, and frankly not interested enough -- yet -- to do the work, I had to employ the only goodness check on Garrett Lisi I can, the ambigram test: will his name tile an infinite plane, while at the same time presenting 180-degree rotational symmetry, so it can be read both up and down, forever and ever? Well, will it?



    Yep. He gets the check mark. It's just not quite as interesting and elegant as, say...

    0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
    Skepticism enables us to distinguish fancy from fact, to test our speculations. --Carl Sagan

Similar Threads

  1. One for 01101001
    By Jim in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 2009-Jan-25, 05:38 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •