Due to a flood of PM spam, I've modified the forum configuration so that members who have posted fewer than 10 times can't send private messages. If anyone sees any problems with their PMs, let me know.
ToSeek
BAUT Forum Administrator
Due to a flood of PM spam, I've modified the forum configuration so that members who have posted fewer than 10 times can't send private messages. If anyone sees any problems with their PMs, let me know.
ToSeek
BAUT Forum Administrator
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Should we resend recent PMs?
If it worked the way it should have, no one with more than 10 posts should be affected other than they probably can't send a PM to someone with fewer than 10 posts.
If two regular members would like to verify this to be sure, that would be good. I've already verified that I can send a PM to myself and that a moderator can send me a PM.
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
I sent a PM to Paul Beardsley, who will presumably let me know one way or another if he got it. We'll see.
_____________________________________________
Gillian
"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"
"You can't erase icing."
"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
ToSeek, I've noticed that I'm getting timed out this morning after just a few minutes of inactivity. Also, the Currently Active Members list seems to be acting strangely -- members aren't listed as being on-line yet the green light is on next to their username in posts. Are these related to the changes you've made today? Just curious.
There's been several of times where the currently logged in people list has been reset and slowly populated again.
It may be related to a massive spammer attack we've been under lately.
__________________________________________________
Reductionist and proud of it.
Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn. Benjamin Franklin
Chase after the truth like all hell and you'll free yourself, even though you never touch its coat tails. Clarence Darrow
A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. Mark Twain
Spammers....yuck. Someone down in the Untrue Fact thread made a post about spammers being designated war criminals or somesuch. I'm thinking that maybe that's a good idea!
As for the untimely timeouts, if it wasn't related to the spamming/antispamming activity, perhaps I went through a time warp or two. I seem to be doing that a lot since my second kid was born. Sigh.
Thanks ToSeek and Henrik.
[QUOTE=ABR.;1456976]SNIPPET:As for the untimely timeouts, if it wasn't related to the spamming/antispamming activity, perhaps I went through a time warp or two. I seem to be doing that a lot since my second kid was born. Sigh.
ABR. When my second kid was born, my friend Ed said" Now you've done it...you're gonna realize..kids are a form of birth control."...within a few months I knew exactly what he meant!...pete
He has, and we have, but he just keeps coming back.![]()
"Words that make questions may not be questions at all."
- Neil deGrasse Tyson, answering loaded question in ten words or less
at a 2010 talk MCed by Stephen Colbert.
ToSeek - Good for you!
I've never received any spam via PM, however, so I'm curious as to the nature of the issue.
If you required moderator confirmation of new members before they had any posting/PM privalages, would that help?
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Well, when 95% of the spammers pick usernames like QR33726, spotting them isMugs - If you required moderator confirmation of new members before they had any posting/PM privalages, would that help?
That's indeed a problem, but I'm sure your PM restrictions help. Have you considered also requiring moderator approval for the first couple of posts? Probably take less time than chasing spam...The issue is that people were registering and then sending private messages advertising a particular website - in the hour before I shut that door, I got five such messages.
Is only 'twas so.
Of the suspected spammers I checked the last couple of days based on user name, about 10% were longstanding regular members.
If you can write an algorithm that, without any false positives, can identify the spammers in this list: ngc3314, stapo3, tdvance, jmarcusm, Elukka, mugaliens, trinitree88, m74z00219, BenissaMo, cjameshuff, SMacB, JESMKS, DiMuntari, ABR. and ajv, then I'll be interested.
__________________________________________________
Reductionist and proud of it.
Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn. Benjamin Franklin
Chase after the truth like all hell and you'll free yourself, even though you never touch its coat tails. Clarence Darrow
A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. Mark Twain
Well, can one really trust any username that contains a punctuation mark?
One obvious rule of thumb: if the member name is all numbers, the messages have got to be spam.
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
Skepticism enables us to distinguish fancy from fact, to test our speculations. --Carl Sagan
Good point. *Heads off again to the ban panel*
"Words that make questions may not be questions at all."
- Neil deGrasse Tyson, answering loaded question in ten words or less
at a 2010 talk MCed by Stephen Colbert.
Just for your peace of mind, it's not just on BAUT. This, or something similar has been happening on many forums over the past couple of weeks.Originally Posted by ToSeek
__________________________________________________
Reductionist and proud of it.
Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn. Benjamin Franklin
Chase after the truth like all hell and you'll free yourself, even though you never touch its coat tails. Clarence Darrow
A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. Mark Twain
You didn't get it...
I understand the reasoning behind the "less than 10 Posts"/no PM rule. But I will offer up the thought that it makes it tough for us newbies to get a hold of a Moderator for some reason that we don't necessarily wish to become a public discussion.
To emphasize: Not complaining, but wanted to ask a question of a moderator, and it is not possible to do until I have 10 posts. This is not the end of the world, and I will cope.
TJ
Yeah, we mods are finding it equally inconvenient when we have to get a hold of a new user via PM and can't. (Same reason.)
Just goes to show why you should all listen to Bob Barker and have your spammers spayed or neutered.
"Words that make questions may not be questions at all."
- Neil deGrasse Tyson, answering loaded question in ten words or less
at a 2010 talk MCed by Stephen Colbert.